DEVELOPMENT OF QUALITY INDICATORS FOR MENTAL HEALTHCARE IN THE DANUBE REGION

被引:5
|
作者
Lehmann, Isabell [1 ]
Chisholm, Dan [2 ]
Hinkov, Hristo [3 ]
Hoschl, Cyril [4 ]
Kapocs, Gabor [5 ,6 ]
Kurimay, Tamas [5 ]
Lecic-Tosevski, Dusica [7 ]
Nakov, Vladimir [3 ]
Rethelyi, Janos M. [8 ]
Winkler, Petr [9 ]
Zielasek, Juergen [1 ]
Gaebel, Wolfgang [1 ,10 ]
机构
[1] LVR Inst Healthcare Res, Cologne, Germany
[2] WHO, Reg Off Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Natl Ctr Publ Hlth & Anal, Sofia, Bulgaria
[4] Natl Inst Mental Hlth, Klecany, Czech Republic
[5] Semmelweis Univ, St John Hosp, Teaching Dept, Buda Family Ctr Mental Hlth Ctr,Dept Psychiat & P, Budapest, Hungary
[6] Semmelweis Univ, Inst Behav Sci, Budapest, Hungary
[7] Serbian Acad Arts & Sci, Inst Mental Hlth, Belgrade, Serbia
[8] Semmelweis Univ, Dept Psychiat & Psychotherapy, Budapest, Hungary
[9] Natl Inst Mental Hlth, Dept Social Psychiat, Klecany, Czech Republic
[10] Heinrich Heine Univ, Med Fac, Dept Psychiat, LVR Klinikum, Dusseldorf, Germany
关键词
mental healthcare; psychiatry; quality indicator; quality assurance; quality management; health system performance; Danube region; EPA GUIDANCE; FRAMEWORK; CONSENSUS;
D O I
10.24869/psyd.2018.197
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background: Quality indicators are quality assurance instruments for the evaluation of mental healthcare systems. Quality indicators can be used to measure the effectiveness of mental healthcare structure and process reforms. This project aims to develop quality indicators for mental healthcare systems in Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Hungary and Serbia to provide monitoring instruments for the transformation of mental healthcare systems in these countries. Methods: Quality indicators for mental healthcare systems were developed in a systematic, multidisciplinary approach. A systematic literature study was conducted to identify quality indicators that are used internationally in mental healthcare. Retrieved quality indicators were systematically selected by means of defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Quality indicators were subsequently rated in a two-stage Delphi study for relevance, validity and feasibility (data availability and data collection effort). The Delphi panel included 22 individuals in the first round, and 18 individuals in the second and final round. Results: Overall, mental healthcare quality indicators were rated higher in relevance than in validity (Mean relevance=7.6, SD=0.8; Mean validity=7.1, SD=0.7). There was no statistically significant difference in scores between the four countries for relevance (X-2(3)=3.581, p=0.310) and validity (X-2(3)=1.145, p=0.766). For data availability, the appraisal of "YES" (data are available) ranged from 6% for "assisted housing" to 94% for "total beds for mental healthcare per 100,000 population" and "availability of mental health service facilities". Conclusion: Quality indicators were developed in a systematic and multidisciplinary development process. There was a broad consensus among mental healthcare experts from the participating countries in terms of relevance and validity of the proposed quality indicators. In a next step, the feasibility of these twenty-two indicators will be evaluated in a pilot study in the participating countries.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 206
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Healthcare quality indicators - a systematic review
    Yildiz, Ozkan
    Demirors, Onur
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2014, 27 (03) : 209 - 222
  • [22] Mental health indicators in primary healthcare: assessment of the quality of access through case detection capacity
    Salgado, Manoela Alves
    Correia Lima Fortes, Sandra Lucia
    [J]. CADERNOS DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2021, 37 (09):
  • [23] Should indicators be correlated? Formative indicators for healthcare quality measurement
    Blotenberg, Iris
    Schang, Laura
    Boywitt, Dennis
    [J]. BMJ OPEN QUALITY, 2022, 11 (02)
  • [24] CHOSEN REGIONAL SOCIO-ECONOMIC INDICATORS WITHIN THE DANUBE REGION STRATEGY
    Vybostok, Jan
    Kramarekova, Hilda
    [J]. GEOGRAFICKE INFORMACIE, VOL 20, 2016, 20 (02): : 807 - 827
  • [25] Drivers for Rural Development of Danube's Delta Region
    Rodino, Steliana
    Ursu, Ana
    Pop, Ruxandra
    Dragomir, Vili
    [J]. EDUCATION EXCELLENCE AND INNOVATION MANAGEMENT THROUGH VISION 2020, 2019, : 7774 - 7785
  • [26] MEASURING THE LEVEL OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT OF UPPER DANUBE REGION
    Zoran, Njegovan
    Radovan, Pejanovic
    Katarina, Markovic
    [J]. EKONOMIKA POLJOPRIVREDA-ECONOMICS OF AGRICULTURE, 2011, 58 : 358 - 364
  • [27] Development of mental health quality indicators (MHQIs) for inpatient psychiatry based on the interRAI mental health assessment
    Perlman, Christopher M.
    Hirdes, John P.
    Barbaree, Howard
    Fries, Brant E.
    McKillop, Ian
    Morris, John N.
    Rabinowitz, Terry
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2013, 13 : 15
  • [28] Development of mental health quality indicators (MHQIs) for inpatient psychiatry based on the interRAI mental health assessment
    Christopher M Perlman
    John P Hirdes
    Howard Barbaree
    Brant E Fries
    Ian McKillop
    John N Morris
    Terry Rabinowitz
    [J]. BMC Health Services Research, 13
  • [29] COMPLEMENTARITY OF DIFFERENT STRATEGY BY SUPPORTING THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE DANUBE REGION
    Jovanovic, Sonja
    Radukic, Snezana
    [J]. EKONOMIKA POLJOPRIVREDA-ECONOMICS OF AGRICULTURE, 2011, 58 : 276 - 284
  • [30] Broadening the monitoring of reproductive healthcare; the development of organizational and patient-centred quality indicators
    Nelen, W. L. D. M.
    den Breejen, E. M. E.
    Schol, S. F. E.
    Kremer, J. A. M.
    Hermens, R. P. M. G.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2011, 26 : I272 - I273