Prospective Quality of Life Outcomes Following Robotic Surgery in Gynecologic Oncology

被引:14
|
作者
Abitbol, Jeremie [1 ]
Lau, Susie [2 ,3 ]
Ramanakumar, Agnihotram V. [6 ]
Press, Joshua Z. [2 ,3 ]
Drummond, Nancy [2 ,3 ]
Rosberger, Zeev [4 ,5 ]
Aubin, Sylvie [4 ,5 ]
Gotlieb, Raphael [2 ,3 ]
How, Jeffrey [2 ,3 ]
Gotlieb, Walter H. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Div Expt Med, Dept Med, Montreal, PQ H3T 1E2, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Jewish Gen Hosp, Segal Canc Ctr, Div Gynecol Oncol, Montreal, PQ H3T 1E2, Canada
[3] McGill Univ, Jewish Gen Hosp, Segal Canc Ctr, Lady Davis Res Inst, Montreal, PQ H3T 1E2, Canada
[4] McGill Univ, Jewish Gen Hosp, Segal Canc Ctr, Louise Granofsky Psychosocial Oncol Program, Montreal, PQ H3T 1E2, Canada
[5] McGill Univ, Jewish Gen Hosp, Segal Canc Ctr, Div Psychol, Montreal, PQ H3T 1E2, Canada
[6] McGill Univ, Div Canc Epidemiol, Dept Oncol, Montreal, PQ H3T 1E2, Canada
关键词
Robotic surgery; quality of life; outcome; body image; ENDOMETRIAL CANCER; OVARIAN-CANCER; WOMEN; POPULATION; PATIENT; FOCUS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.04.052
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose. To characterize the health-related quality of life (HRQL) of patients undergoing robotic surgery for the treatment of gynecologic cancers. Methods. 211 patients completed a quality of life questionnaire before surgery. Postoperative questionnaires, consisting of the same assessment with the addition of postoperative questions, were given at 1 week, 3 weeks, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy General (FACT-G) and its subscales were used to evaluate HRQL. Patient-rated body image was evaluated using the Body Image Scale. Statistical significance was measured by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Minimally important difference (MID) values were analyzed to evaluate clinical significance. Results. Overall HRQL and body image decreased at 1 week after surgery and returned to baseline by 3 weeks. Physical and functional well-being decreased at 1 week after surgery and returned to baseline by 3 months after surgery. However, using MID criteria, physical well-being returned to baseline by 3 weeks. Social well-being did not change significantly. Emotional well-being increased immediately by 1 week after surgery. Conclusion. Patient reported HRQL outcomes following robotic surgery for the treatment of gynecologic cancers suggests a rapid return to pre-surgery values. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:144 / 149
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Baseline characteristics influencing quality of life in women undergoing gynecologic oncology surgery
    Karen M Gil
    Heidi E Gibbons
    Eric L Jenison
    Michael P Hopkins
    Vivian E von Gruenigen
    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 5
  • [32] Ergonomic Deficits in Robotic Gynecologic Oncology Surgery: A Need for Intervention
    Craven, Renatta
    Franasiak, Jason
    Mosaly, Prithima
    Gehrig, Paola A.
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 20 (05) : 648 - 655
  • [33] Successful incorporation of robotic surgery into gynecologic oncology fellowship training
    Soliman, Pamela T.
    Iglesias, David
    Munsell, Mark F.
    Frumovitz, Michael
    Westin, Shannon N.
    Nick, Alpa M.
    Schmeler, Kathleen M.
    Ramirez, Pedro T.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2013, 131 (03) : 730 - 733
  • [34] Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: evolution of a new surgical paradigm
    John F. Boggess
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2007, 1 (1) : 31 - 37
  • [35] Effect of robotic surgery on a Gynecologic Oncology Fellowship Training Program
    Hoekstra, A. V.
    Jairam-Thodla, A.
    Berry, E.
    Lurain, J. R.
    Buttin, B. M.
    Singh, D. K.
    Schink, J. C.
    Lowe, M. P.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2008, 111 (02) : 377 - 377
  • [36] Emergence of robotic assisted surgery in gynecologic oncology: American perspective
    Mendivil, Alberto
    Holloway, Robert W.
    Boggess, John F.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2009, 114 (02) : S24 - S31
  • [37] Successful incorporation of robotic surgery into gynecologic oncology fellowship training
    Iglesias, D.
    Munsell, M.
    Frumovitz, M.
    Westin, S.
    Nick, A.
    Schmeler, K.
    Ramirez, P.
    Soliman, P.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2012, 125 : S125 - S125
  • [38] Robotic-Assisted Surgery in Gynecologic Oncology: Hype or Hope
    Singhal S.
    Indian Journal of Gynecologic Oncology, 2017, 15 (3)
  • [39] Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: evolution of a new surgical paradigm
    Boggess, John F.
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2007, 1 (01) : 31 - 37
  • [40] Spirituality and quality of life in gynecologic oncology patients
    Gioiella, ME
    Berkman, B
    Robinson, M
    CANCER PRACTICE, 1998, 6 (06) : 333 - 338