Prospective Quality of Life Outcomes Following Robotic Surgery in Gynecologic Oncology

被引:14
|
作者
Abitbol, Jeremie [1 ]
Lau, Susie [2 ,3 ]
Ramanakumar, Agnihotram V. [6 ]
Press, Joshua Z. [2 ,3 ]
Drummond, Nancy [2 ,3 ]
Rosberger, Zeev [4 ,5 ]
Aubin, Sylvie [4 ,5 ]
Gotlieb, Raphael [2 ,3 ]
How, Jeffrey [2 ,3 ]
Gotlieb, Walter H. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Div Expt Med, Dept Med, Montreal, PQ H3T 1E2, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Jewish Gen Hosp, Segal Canc Ctr, Div Gynecol Oncol, Montreal, PQ H3T 1E2, Canada
[3] McGill Univ, Jewish Gen Hosp, Segal Canc Ctr, Lady Davis Res Inst, Montreal, PQ H3T 1E2, Canada
[4] McGill Univ, Jewish Gen Hosp, Segal Canc Ctr, Louise Granofsky Psychosocial Oncol Program, Montreal, PQ H3T 1E2, Canada
[5] McGill Univ, Jewish Gen Hosp, Segal Canc Ctr, Div Psychol, Montreal, PQ H3T 1E2, Canada
[6] McGill Univ, Div Canc Epidemiol, Dept Oncol, Montreal, PQ H3T 1E2, Canada
关键词
Robotic surgery; quality of life; outcome; body image; ENDOMETRIAL CANCER; OVARIAN-CANCER; WOMEN; POPULATION; PATIENT; FOCUS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.04.052
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose. To characterize the health-related quality of life (HRQL) of patients undergoing robotic surgery for the treatment of gynecologic cancers. Methods. 211 patients completed a quality of life questionnaire before surgery. Postoperative questionnaires, consisting of the same assessment with the addition of postoperative questions, were given at 1 week, 3 weeks, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy General (FACT-G) and its subscales were used to evaluate HRQL. Patient-rated body image was evaluated using the Body Image Scale. Statistical significance was measured by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Minimally important difference (MID) values were analyzed to evaluate clinical significance. Results. Overall HRQL and body image decreased at 1 week after surgery and returned to baseline by 3 weeks. Physical and functional well-being decreased at 1 week after surgery and returned to baseline by 3 months after surgery. However, using MID criteria, physical well-being returned to baseline by 3 weeks. Social well-being did not change significantly. Emotional well-being increased immediately by 1 week after surgery. Conclusion. Patient reported HRQL outcomes following robotic surgery for the treatment of gynecologic cancers suggests a rapid return to pre-surgery values. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:144 / 149
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] QUALITY OF LIFE FOR THE GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY PATIENT
    NEWTON, M
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1979, 134 (08) : 866 - 869
  • [22] Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: Impact on fellowship training
    Hoekstra, Anna V.
    Morgan, Jacqueline M.
    Lurain, John R.
    Buttin, Barbara M.
    Singh, Dijeet K.
    Schink, Julian C.
    Lowe, M. Patrick.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2009, 114 (02) : 168 - 172
  • [23] Overcoming technical challenges with robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology
    Michael A. Finan
    Rodney P. Rocconi
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2010, 24 : 1256 - 1260
  • [24] Computer-enhanced robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology
    Jayson B. Field
    Michelle F. Benoit
    Tri A. Dinh
    Concepcion Diaz-Arrastia
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2007, 21 : 244 - 246
  • [25] Routine Cystoscopy After Robotic Gynecologic Oncology Surgery
    Nguyen, My-Linh T.
    Stevens, Erin
    LaFargue, Christopher J.
    Karsy, Michael
    Pua, Tarah L.
    Gorelick, Constantine
    Tedjarati, Sean S.
    Pradhan, Tana S.
    JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2014, 18 (03)
  • [26] Overcoming technical challenges with robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology
    Finan, Michael A.
    Rocconi, Rodney P.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2010, 24 (06): : 1256 - 1260
  • [27] QUALITY-OF-LIFE IN GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
    SCHNURCH, HG
    MOLINSKI, H
    BENDER, HG
    GYNAKOLOGE, 1988, 21 (04): : 323 - 327
  • [28] Quality-of-Life Outcomes in Transoral Robotic Surgery
    Hurtuk, Agnes M.
    Marcinow, Anna
    Agrawal, Amit
    Old, Matthew
    Teknos, Theodoros N.
    Ozer, Enver
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2012, 146 (01) : 68 - 73
  • [29] Anesthesia management and outcomes of gynecologic oncology surgery
    Yeniay, Hicret
    Kuvaki, Bahar
    Ozbilgin, Sule
    Saatli, Hasan Bahadir
    Timur, Hikmet Tunc
    POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE, 2023, 135 (06) : 578 - 587
  • [30] Baseline characteristics influencing quality of life in women undergoing gynecologic oncology surgery
    Gil, Karen M.
    Gibbons, Heidi E.
    Jenison, Eric L.
    Hopkins, Michael P.
    von Gruenigen, Vivian E.
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2007, 5 (1)