In Vivo Comparative Evaluation of Biocompatibility and Biodegradation of Bovine and Porcine Collagen Membranes

被引:20
|
作者
Dacache Neto, Abdu Mansur [1 ]
Sartoretto, Suelen Cristina [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Duarte, Isabelle Martins [5 ]
de Brito Resende, Rodrigo Figueiredo [3 ,6 ]
Neves Novellino Alves, Adriana Terezinha [7 ]
de Almeida Barros Mourao, Carlos Fernando [8 ]
Calasans-Maia, Jose [9 ]
Montemezzi, Pietro
Tristao, Gilson Coutinho [10 ]
Calasans-Maia, Monica Diuana [4 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Fluminense, Dent Sch, Grad Program, BR-24020140 Niteroi, RJ, Brazil
[2] Univ Veiga Almeida, Dent Sch, Oral Surg Dept, BR-20271020 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[3] Univ Iguacu, Dent Sch, Oral Surg Dept, BR-26260045 Nova Iguacu, RJ, Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Fluminense, Clin Res Lab Dent, BR-24020140 Niteroi, RJ, Brazil
[5] Univ Veiga Almeida, Postgrad Program Dent, BR-20271020 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[6] Univ Fed Fluminense, Oral Surg Dept, BR-24020140 Niteroi, RJ, Brazil
[7] Univ Fed Fluminense, Oral Diag Dept, BR-24020140 Niteroi, RJ, Brazil
[8] Univ Fed Fluminense, Postgrad Program Biotechnol, BR-24020140 Niteroi, RJ, Brazil
[9] Univ Fed Fluminense, Orthodont Dept, BR-24020140 Niteroi, RJ, Brazil
[10] Univ Fed Fluminense, Periodont Dept, BR-24020140 Niteroi, RJ, Brazil
关键词
biocompatibility; biodegradation; collagen membrane; guided bone regeneration; subcutaneous; mice; GUIDED BONE REGENERATION; FOREIGN-BODY REACTION; HISTOLOGICAL-EVALUATION; BIORESORBABLE BARRIER; TISSUE-RESPONSE; EXPRESSION; GUIDELINES; CYTOKINE;
D O I
10.3390/membranes10120423
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Mechanical barriers prevent the invasion of the surrounding soft tissues within the bone defects. This concept is known as Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR). The knowledge about the local tissue reaction and the time of degradation of absorbable membranes favors the correct clinical indication. This study aimed to evaluate the biocompatibility and biodegradation of a bovine collagen membrane (Lyostypt(R), Sao Goncalo, Brazil) and compare it to a porcine collagen membrane (Bio-Gide(R)) implanted in the subcutaneous tissue of mice, following ISO 10993-6:2016. Thirty Balb-C mice were randomly divided into three experimental groups, LT (Lyostypt(R)), BG (Bio-Gide(R)), and Sham (without implantation), and subdivided according to the experimental periods (7, 21, and 63 days). The BG was considered non-irritant at seven days and slight and moderate irritant at 21 and 63 days, respectively. The LT presented a small irritant reaction at seven days, a mild reaction after 21, and a reduction in the inflammatory response at 63 days. The biodegradation of the LT occurred more rapidly compared to the BG after 63 days. This study concluded that both membranes were considered biocompatible since their tissue reactions were compatible with the physiological inflammatory process; however, the Bio-Gide(R) was less degraded during the experimental periods, favoring the guided bone regeneration process.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 14
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] BIOCOMPATIBILITY OF DIALYSIS MEMBRANES - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY
    MARTINMALO, A
    CASTILLO, D
    CASTRO, M
    PEREZ, R
    RIOS, A
    JARABA, M
    ALJAMA, P
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 1991, 6 : 55 - 58
  • [32] Cellular inflammatory response to porcine collagen membranes
    Patino, MG
    Neiders, ME
    Andreana, S
    Noble, B
    Cohen, RE
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL RESEARCH, 2003, 38 (05) : 458 - 464
  • [33] In Vivo Evaluation of Biocompatibility and Chondrogenic Potential of a Cell-Free Collagen-Based Scaffold
    Calabrese, Giovanna
    Gulino, Rosario
    Giuffrida, Raffaella
    Forte, Stefano
    Figallo, Elisa
    Fabbi, Claudia
    Salvatorelli, Lucia
    Memeo, Lorenzo
    Gulisano, Massimo
    Parenti, Rosalba
    FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 8
  • [34] Biocompatibility studies of modified collagen/hyaluronan membranes after implantation
    Koller J.
    Bakoš D.
    Sadloňová I.
    Cell and Tissue Banking, 2001, 2 (3) : 135 - 142
  • [35] In vitro and in vivo biocompatibility of substituted cellulose and synthetic membranes
    Mandolfo, S
    Tetta, C
    David, S
    Gervasio, R
    Ognibene, D
    Wratten, ML
    Tessore, E
    Imbasciati, E
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 1997, 20 (11): : 603 - 609
  • [36] COMPARATIVE REQUIREMENTS OF BOVINE AND PORCINE INSULINS
    MOWBRAY, RRD
    TURNER, JJ
    TRIGGS, S
    BRUCK, E
    GARNER, SD
    NYE, L
    DIABETOLOGIA, 1971, 7 (06) : 476 - &
  • [38] Biocompatibility of a collagen-heparin sulfate scaffold implanted into porcine brain
    Tang, Zhouping
    Chen, Xingyong
    Zeng, Wengao
    Xu, Shabei
    Xie, Xuewei
    Tang, Ronghua
    Zhu, Suiqiang
    NEURAL REGENERATION RESEARCH, 2010, 5 (03) : 191 - 196
  • [39] In Vivo Evaluation of the Biocompatibility of Biomaterial Device
    Frazao, L. P.
    Vieira de Castro, J.
    Neves, Nuno M.
    BIOMIMICKED BIOMATERIALS: ADVANCES IN TISSUE ENGINEERING AND REGENERATIVE MEDICINE, 2020, 1250 : 109 - 124
  • [40] Evaluation of biocompatibility of polypyrrole in vitro and in vivo
    Wang, XD
    Gu, XS
    Yuan, CW
    Chen, SJ
    Zhang, PY
    Zhang, TY
    Yao, J
    Chen, F
    Chen, G
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART A, 2004, 68A (03) : 411 - 422