Feeding jejunostomy tube placement during resection of gastric cancers

被引:18
|
作者
Sun, Zhifei [1 ]
Shenoi, Mithun M. [1 ]
Nussbaum, Daniel P. [1 ]
Keenan, Jeffrey E. [1 ]
Gulack, Brian C. [1 ]
Tyler, Douglas S. [2 ]
Speicher, Paul J. [1 ]
Blazer, Dan G., III [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Univ Texas Med Branch, Dept Surg, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
关键词
Gastric cancer; Gastrectomy; Feeding jejunostomy tube; Nutrition; Outcomes; GASTRECTOMY; MORBIDITY; TRIAL; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; CHEMOTHERAPY; MORTALITY; SURGERY; TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.jss.2015.07.014
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Feeding tube placement is common among patients undergoing gastrectomy, and national guidelines currently recommend consideration of a feeding jejunostomy tube (FJT) for all patients undergoing resection for gastric cancer. However, data are limited regarding the safety of FJT placement at the time of gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Methods: The 2005-2011 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant User Files were queried to identify patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Subjects were classified by the concomitant placement of an FJT. Groups were then propensity matched using a 1: 1 nearest neighbor algorithm, and outcomes were compared between groups. The primary outcomes of interest were overall 30-d overall complications and mortality. Secondary end points included major complications, surgical site infection, and early reoperation. Results: In total, 2980 subjects underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer, among whom 715 (24%) also had an FJT placed. Patients who had an FJT placed were more likely to be male (61.6% versus 56.6%, P = 0.02), have recent weight loss (21.0% versus 14.8%, P < 0.01), and have undergone recent chemotherapy (7.9% versus 4.2%, P < 0.01) and radiation therapy (4.2% versus 1.3%, P < 0.01). They were also more likely to have undergone total (compared with partial) gastrectomy (66.6% versus 28.6%, P < 0.01) and have concomitant resection of an adjacent organ (40.4 versus 24.1%, P < 0.01). After adjustment with propensity matching, however, all baseline characteristics and treatment variables were highly similar. Between groups, there were no statistically significant differences in 30-d overall complications (38.8% versus 36.1%, P = 0.32) or mortality (5.8 versus 3.7%, P = 0.08). There were also no differences in major complications, surgical site infection, or early reoperation. Operative time was slightly longer among patients with feeding tubes placed (median, 248 versus 233 min, P = 0.01), but otherwise there were no significant differences in any outcomes between groups. Conclusions: Concomitant placement of FJT at the time of gastrectomy may result in slightly increased operative times but does not appear to lead to increased perioperative morbidity or mortality. Further investigation is needed to identify the patients most likely to benefit from FJT placement. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 194
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Jejunostomy tube feeding in patients undergoing esophagectomy
    Srinathan, Sadeesh K.
    Hamin, Tamara
    Walter, Stephen
    Tan, A. Lawrence
    Unruh, Helmut W.
    Guyatt, Gordon
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 56 (06) : 409 - 414
  • [42] Feeding tube placement
    Chen, MY
    Ott, DJ
    Gelfand, DW
    RADIOLOGY, 1996, 201 : 522 - 522
  • [43] FEEDING TUBE PLACEMENT
    Denney, Ann
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING, 2012, 112 (05) : 12 - 12
  • [44] Randomized Prospective Comparison of Direct Percutaneous Endoscopic Jejunostomy (DPEJ) Feeding Tube Placement Versus Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Feeding Tube Placement with Jejunal Extension (PEG-J), for Enteral Feeding
    Delegge, Mark
    Buck, Greg
    Fang, John
    Disario, James
    Lehman, Glen
    Ginsberg, Gregory
    Mcclave, Steve
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2006, 63 (05) : AB160 - AB160
  • [45] Use of Noninvasive Ventilation During Feeding Tube Placement
    Banfi, Paolo
    Volpato, Eleonora
    Valota, Chiara
    D'Ascenzo, Salvatore
    Alunno, Chiara Bani
    Lax, Agata
    Nicolini, Antonello
    Ticozzi, Nicola
    Silani, Vincenzo
    Bach, John R.
    RESPIRATORY CARE, 2017, 62 (11) : 1474 - 1484
  • [46] A novel application for single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS): SIL jejunostomy feeding tube placement
    S. Sameer Mohiuddin
    C. Erik Anderson
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2011, 25 : 323 - 327
  • [47] A novel application for single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS): SIL jejunostomy feeding tube placement
    Mohiuddin, S. Sameer
    Anderson, C. Erik
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2011, 25 (01): : 323 - 327
  • [48] Predictors and outcomes of jejunostomy tube placement at the time of pancreatoduodenectomy
    Song, Yun
    Tieniber, Andrew D.
    Vollmer, Charles M.
    Lee, Major K.
    Roses, Robert E.
    Fraker, Douglas L.
    Kelz, Rachel R.
    Karakousis, Giorgos C.
    SURGERY, 2019, 165 (06) : 1136 - 1143
  • [49] Technical notes and outcomes of robot-assisted and laparoscopic jejunostomy placement for tube feeding after esophagectomy
    Kingma, B. Feike
    Turchi, Matias M.
    Lovera, Romina
    Ramirez, Mauricio
    Badaloni, Adolfo
    van Hillegersberg, Richard
    Ruurda, Jelle P.
    Nieponice, Alejandro
    ANNALS OF ESOPHAGUS, 2022, 5
  • [50] Comparison of Feeding Jejunostomy via Gastric Tube Versus Jejunum After Esophageal Cancer Surgery
    Konishi, Tomoki
    Shiozaki, Atsushi
    Fujiwara, Hitoshi
    Konishi, Hirotaka
    Takemoto, Kenichi
    Kudou, Michihiro
    Shoda, Katsutoshi
    Arita, Tomohiro
    Kosuga, Toshiyuki
    Morimura, Ryo
    Murayama, Yasutoshi
    Kuriu, Yoshiaki
    Ikoma, Hisashi
    Kubota, Takeshi
    Nakanishi, Masayoshi
    Okamoto, Kazuma
    Otsuji, Eigo
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 38 (08) : 4941 - 4945