Feeding jejunostomy tube placement during resection of gastric cancers

被引:18
|
作者
Sun, Zhifei [1 ]
Shenoi, Mithun M. [1 ]
Nussbaum, Daniel P. [1 ]
Keenan, Jeffrey E. [1 ]
Gulack, Brian C. [1 ]
Tyler, Douglas S. [2 ]
Speicher, Paul J. [1 ]
Blazer, Dan G., III [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Univ Texas Med Branch, Dept Surg, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
关键词
Gastric cancer; Gastrectomy; Feeding jejunostomy tube; Nutrition; Outcomes; GASTRECTOMY; MORBIDITY; TRIAL; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; CHEMOTHERAPY; MORTALITY; SURGERY; TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.jss.2015.07.014
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Feeding tube placement is common among patients undergoing gastrectomy, and national guidelines currently recommend consideration of a feeding jejunostomy tube (FJT) for all patients undergoing resection for gastric cancer. However, data are limited regarding the safety of FJT placement at the time of gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Methods: The 2005-2011 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant User Files were queried to identify patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Subjects were classified by the concomitant placement of an FJT. Groups were then propensity matched using a 1: 1 nearest neighbor algorithm, and outcomes were compared between groups. The primary outcomes of interest were overall 30-d overall complications and mortality. Secondary end points included major complications, surgical site infection, and early reoperation. Results: In total, 2980 subjects underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer, among whom 715 (24%) also had an FJT placed. Patients who had an FJT placed were more likely to be male (61.6% versus 56.6%, P = 0.02), have recent weight loss (21.0% versus 14.8%, P < 0.01), and have undergone recent chemotherapy (7.9% versus 4.2%, P < 0.01) and radiation therapy (4.2% versus 1.3%, P < 0.01). They were also more likely to have undergone total (compared with partial) gastrectomy (66.6% versus 28.6%, P < 0.01) and have concomitant resection of an adjacent organ (40.4 versus 24.1%, P < 0.01). After adjustment with propensity matching, however, all baseline characteristics and treatment variables were highly similar. Between groups, there were no statistically significant differences in 30-d overall complications (38.8% versus 36.1%, P = 0.32) or mortality (5.8 versus 3.7%, P = 0.08). There were also no differences in major complications, surgical site infection, or early reoperation. Operative time was slightly longer among patients with feeding tubes placed (median, 248 versus 233 min, P = 0.01), but otherwise there were no significant differences in any outcomes between groups. Conclusions: Concomitant placement of FJT at the time of gastrectomy may result in slightly increased operative times but does not appear to lead to increased perioperative morbidity or mortality. Further investigation is needed to identify the patients most likely to benefit from FJT placement. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 194
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Utilization and Morbidity Associated With Routine Placement of a Feeding Jejunostomy at the Time of Gastro-Esophageal Resection
    Llaguna, Omar H.
    Kim, Hong Jin
    Stitzenberg, Karyn B.
    Calvo, Benjamin E.
    Meyers, Michael O.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 140 (05) : S1034 - S1035
  • [32] Jejunostomy tube placement under direct visualization
    Martins, Noel
    Ajmere, Niraj
    Bhattacharya, Kanishka
    Levey, John
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2007, 102 : S538 - S538
  • [33] Jejunostomy tube placement with transgastric endoscopic guidance
    Martins, Noel B.
    Levey, John M.
    McEnaney, Patrick M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2006, 101 (09): : S534 - S534
  • [34] A TECHNIQUE OF DIRECT PERCUTANEOUS JEJUNOSTOMY TUBE PLACEMENT
    PRITCHARD, TJ
    BLOOM, AD
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 1994, 178 (02) : 173 - 174
  • [35] Randomized clinical trial comparing feeding jejunostomy with nasoduodenal tube placement in patients undergoing oesophagectomy
    Han-Geurts, I. J. M.
    Hop, W. C.
    Verhoef, C.
    Tran, K. T. C.
    Tilanus, H. W.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 94 (01) : 31 - 35
  • [36] Feeding tube placement verification using gastric pH measurement
    Chen, CA
    Paxton, P
    WilliamsBurgess, C
    ONLINE JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE SYNTHESIS FOR NURSING, 1996, 3 (34): : 1 - 9
  • [37] Optimizing radiographic control of gastric feeding tube placement in neonates
    Daniel, Quandt
    Philipp, MeyerSchiffer
    Egil, Brons
    Thomas, Schraner
    Ulrich, Bucher Hans
    Romaine, Arlettaz Mieth
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2012, 142 : 11S - 11S
  • [38] NONOPERATIVE CONVERSION OF TUBE GASTROSTOMY TO FEEDING JEJUNOSTOMY
    SALKY, B
    KREEL, I
    GELERNT, I
    BAUER, J
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1982, 143 (03): : 387 - 388
  • [39] Routine jejunostomy tube feeding following esophagectomy
    Weijs, Teus J.
    van Eden, Hanneke W. J.
    Ruurda, Jelle P.
    Luyer, Misha D. P.
    Steenhagen, Elles
    Nieuwenhuijzen, Grard A. P.
    van Hillegersberg, Richard
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2017, 9 : S851 - S860
  • [40] Jejunostomy with replaceable feeding tube: A new technique
    Schimpl, G
    Mayr, J
    Gauderer, MWL
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 1997, 184 (06) : 652 - 654