Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a progressive, individualised walking and education programme for prevention of low back pain recurrence in adults: study protocol for the WalkBack randomised controlled trial

被引:5
|
作者
Pocovi, Natasha Celeste [1 ]
Lin, Chung-Wei C. [2 ,3 ]
Latimer, Jane [2 ,3 ]
Merom, Dafna [4 ]
Tiedemann, Anne [2 ,3 ]
Maher, Christopher [2 ,3 ]
van Tulder, Maurits W. [5 ]
Macaskill, Petra [6 ]
Clavisi, Ornella [7 ]
Tong, Shuk Yin Kate [1 ]
Hancock, Mark J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Macquarie Univ, Dept Hlth Profess, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Inst Musculoskeletal Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Sydney Local Hlth Dist, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Western Sydney Univ, Dept Phys Act & Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] Univ Amsterdam, Hlth Sci, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Univ Sydney, Sydney Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[7] Musculoskeletal Australia, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2020年 / 10卷 / 10期
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
low back pain; secondary prevention; walking; clinical trial protocol; PRIMARY-CARE; GUIDELINES; PREVALENCE; DISABILITY; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037149
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Low back pain (LBP) is recognised globally as a prevalent, costly and disabling condition. Recurrences are common and contribute to much of the burden of LBP. Current evidence favours exercise and education for prevention of LBP recurrence, but an optimal intervention has not yet been established. Walking is a simple, widely accessible, low-cost intervention that has yet to be evaluated. This randomised controlled trial (RCT) aims to establish the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a progressive and individualised walking and education programme (intervention) for the prevention of LBP recurrences in adults compared with no treatment (control). Methods and analysis A pragmatic, two-armed RCT comparing walking and education (n=349) with a no treatment control group (n=349). Inclusion criteria are adults recovered from an episode of non-specific LBP within the last 6 months. Those allocated to the intervention group will receive six sessions (three face to face and three telephone delivered) with a trained physiotherapist to facilitate a progressive walking programme and education over a 6-month period. The primary outcome will be days to first recurrence of an episode of activity-limiting LBP. The secondary outcomes include days to recurrence of an episode of LBP, days to recurrence of an episode of LBP leading to care seeking, disability and quality of life measured at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months and costs associated with LBP recurrence. All participants will be followed up monthly for a minimum of 12 months. The primary intention-to-treat analysis will assess difference in survival curves (days to recurrence) using the log-rank statistic. The cost-effectiveness analysis will be conducted from the societal perspective. Ethics and dissemination Approved by Macquarie University Human Research Ethics Committee (Reference: 5201949218164, May 2019). Findings will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of outpatient physiotherapy after knee replacement for osteoarthritis: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    Vikki Wylde
    Neil Artz
    Elsa Marques
    Erik Lenguerrand
    Samantha Dixon
    Andrew D. Beswick
    Amanda Burston
    James Murray
    Tarique Parwez
    Ashley W. Blom
    Rachael Gooberman-Hill
    Trials, 17
  • [32] NEUROCANTRIAL: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a pain neuroscience education programme in adults with cancer pain
    Ordonez-Mora, Leidy Tatiana
    Rosero, Ilem D.
    Morales-Osorio, Marco Antonio
    Guil, Rocio
    Quintero Jordan, Giancarlo
    Agudelo Jimenez, Julian Alberto
    Gonzalez-Ruiz, Katherine
    Avila-Valencia, Juan Carlos
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (09):
  • [33] Pain education to prevent chronic low back pain: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    Traeger, Adrian C.
    Moseley, G. Lorimer
    Huebscher, Markus
    Lee, Hopin
    Skinner, Ian W.
    Nicholas, Michael K.
    Henschke, Nicholas
    Refshauge, Kathryn M.
    Blyth, Fiona M.
    Main, Chris J.
    Hush, Julia M.
    Pearce, Garry
    McAuley, James H.
    BMJ OPEN, 2014, 4 (06):
  • [34] Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a universal parenting skills programme in deprived communities: multicentre randomised controlled trial
    Simkiss, D. E.
    Snooks, H. A.
    Stallard, N.
    Kimani, P. K.
    Sewell, B.
    Fitzsimmons, D.
    Anthony, R.
    Winstanley, S.
    Wilson, L.
    Phillips, C. J.
    Stewart-Brown, S.
    BMJ OPEN, 2013, 3 (08):
  • [35] Effectiveness of a pain neuroscience education programme on the physical activity of patients with chronic low back pain compared with a standard back school programme: protocol for a randomised controlled study (END-LC)
    Thebault, Guillaume
    Duflos, Claire
    Le Perf, Gael
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (06):
  • [36] Cluster-randomised controlled trial to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an obesity prevention programme for Chinese primary school-aged children: the CHIRPY DRAGON study protocol
    Li, Bai
    Liu, Wei Jia
    Adab, Peymane
    Pallan, Miranda
    Hemming, Karla
    Frew, Emma
    Lin, Rong
    Martin, James
    Liu, Wei
    Cheng, Kar Keung
    BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (11):
  • [37] Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of intradiscal methylene blue injection for chronic discogenic low back pain: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Geurts, Jose W.
    Kallewaard, Jan-Willem
    Kessels, Alfons
    Willems, Paul C.
    van Santbrink, Henk
    Dirksen, Carmen
    van Kleef, Maarten
    TRIALS, 2015, 16
  • [38] Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of intradiscal methylene blue injection for chronic discogenic low back pain: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    José W. Geurts
    Jan-Willem Kallewaard
    Alfons Kessels
    Paul C. Willems
    Henk van Santbrink
    Carmen Dirksen
    Maarten van Kleef
    Trials, 16
  • [39] Study protocol for an investigation of the effectiveness of the pain toolkit for people with low back pain: double-blind randomised controlled trial
    Findley, Gillian
    Ryan, Cormac
    Cartwright, Amy
    Martin, Denis
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (11):
  • [40] Individualised Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy: The ISDR Study-A Randomised Controlled Trial of Safety, Efficacy, and Cost-Effectiveness
    Broadbent, Deborah Mary
    Wang, Amu
    Cheyne, Christopher P.
    Lathe, James G.
    Stratton, Irene M.
    Vora, Jiten
    Garcia-Finana, Marta
    James, Marilyn
    Harding, Simon P.
    DIABETES, 2019, 68