Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a progressive, individualised walking and education programme for prevention of low back pain recurrence in adults: study protocol for the WalkBack randomised controlled trial

被引:5
|
作者
Pocovi, Natasha Celeste [1 ]
Lin, Chung-Wei C. [2 ,3 ]
Latimer, Jane [2 ,3 ]
Merom, Dafna [4 ]
Tiedemann, Anne [2 ,3 ]
Maher, Christopher [2 ,3 ]
van Tulder, Maurits W. [5 ]
Macaskill, Petra [6 ]
Clavisi, Ornella [7 ]
Tong, Shuk Yin Kate [1 ]
Hancock, Mark J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Macquarie Univ, Dept Hlth Profess, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Inst Musculoskeletal Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Sydney Local Hlth Dist, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Western Sydney Univ, Dept Phys Act & Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] Univ Amsterdam, Hlth Sci, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Univ Sydney, Sydney Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[7] Musculoskeletal Australia, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2020年 / 10卷 / 10期
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
low back pain; secondary prevention; walking; clinical trial protocol; PRIMARY-CARE; GUIDELINES; PREVALENCE; DISABILITY; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037149
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Low back pain (LBP) is recognised globally as a prevalent, costly and disabling condition. Recurrences are common and contribute to much of the burden of LBP. Current evidence favours exercise and education for prevention of LBP recurrence, but an optimal intervention has not yet been established. Walking is a simple, widely accessible, low-cost intervention that has yet to be evaluated. This randomised controlled trial (RCT) aims to establish the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a progressive and individualised walking and education programme (intervention) for the prevention of LBP recurrences in adults compared with no treatment (control). Methods and analysis A pragmatic, two-armed RCT comparing walking and education (n=349) with a no treatment control group (n=349). Inclusion criteria are adults recovered from an episode of non-specific LBP within the last 6 months. Those allocated to the intervention group will receive six sessions (three face to face and three telephone delivered) with a trained physiotherapist to facilitate a progressive walking programme and education over a 6-month period. The primary outcome will be days to first recurrence of an episode of activity-limiting LBP. The secondary outcomes include days to recurrence of an episode of LBP, days to recurrence of an episode of LBP leading to care seeking, disability and quality of life measured at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months and costs associated with LBP recurrence. All participants will be followed up monthly for a minimum of 12 months. The primary intention-to-treat analysis will assess difference in survival curves (days to recurrence) using the log-rank statistic. The cost-effectiveness analysis will be conducted from the societal perspective. Ethics and dissemination Approved by Macquarie University Human Research Ethics Committee (Reference: 5201949218164, May 2019). Findings will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an individualised, progressive walking and education intervention for the prevention of low back pain recurrence in Australia (WalkBack): a randomised controlled trial
    Pocovi, Natasha C.
    Lin, Chung-Wei Christine
    French, Simon
    Graham, Petra L.
    van Dongen, Johanna M.
    Latimer, Jane
    Merom, Dafna
    Tiedemann, Anne
    Maher, Christopher G.
    Clavisi, Ornella
    Tong, Shuk Yin Kate
    Hancock, Mark J.
    LANCET, 2024, 404 (10448): : 134 - 144
  • [2] Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a progressive, individualised walking and education program for prevention of low back pain recurrence in adults: statistical analysis plan for the WalkBack randomised controlled trial
    Pocovi, Natasha C. C.
    Graham, Petra L. L.
    Lin, Chung-Wei Christine
    French, Simon D. D.
    Latimer, Jane
    Merom, Dafna
    Tiedemann, Anne
    Maher, Christopher G. G.
    van Dongen, Johanna M. M.
    Clavisi, Ornella
    Hancock, Mark J. J.
    TRIALS, 2023, 24 (01)
  • [3] Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a progressive, individualised walking and education program for prevention of low back pain recurrence in adults: statistical analysis plan for the WalkBack randomised controlled trial
    Natasha C. Pocovi
    Petra L. Graham
    Chung-Wei Christine Lin
    Simon D. French
    Jane Latimer
    Dafna Merom
    Anne Tiedemann
    Christopher G. Maher
    Johanna M. van Dongen
    Ornella Clavisi
    Mark J. Hancock
    Trials, 24
  • [4] The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a group domestic abuse perpetrator programme: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    Karen Morgan
    Mei-See Man
    Rachael Bloomer
    Madeleine Cochrane
    Melissa Cole
    Sandi Dheensa
    Nathan Eisenstadt
    Gene Feder
    Daisy M. Gaunt
    Rwth Leach
    Rebecca Kandiyali
    Sian Noble
    Tim J. Peters
    Beverly A. Shirkey
    Helen Cramer
    Trials, 24
  • [5] The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a group domestic abuse perpetrator programme: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    Morgan, Karen
    Man, Mei-See
    Bloomer, Rachael
    Cochrane, Madeleine
    Cole, Melissa
    Dheensa, Sandi
    Eisenstadt, Nathan
    Feder, Gene
    Gaunt, Daisy M.
    Leach, Rwth
    Kandiyali, Rebecca
    Noble, Sian
    Peters, Tim J.
    Shirkey, Beverly A.
    Cramer, Helen
    TRIALS, 2023, 24 (01)
  • [6] Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of radiofrequency denervation versus placebo for chronic and moderate to severe low back pain: study protocol for the RADICAL randomised controlled trial
    Ashton, Kate E.
    Price, Cathy
    Fleming, Leah
    Blom, Ashley W.
    Culliford, Lucy
    Evans, Rebecca Nicole
    Foster, Nadine E.
    Hollingworth, William
    Jameson, Catherine
    Jeynes, Nouf
    Moore, Andrew J.
    Orpen, Neil
    Palmer, Cecily
    Reeves, Barnaby C.
    Rogers, Chris A.
    Wylde, Vikki
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (07):
  • [7] Study protocol randomised controlled trial comparison of cost-utility and cost-effectiveness of a face-to-face rehabilitation programme versus a telemedicine programme in the treatment of patients with chronic low back pain
    Castro-Sanchez, Adelaida M.
    Mataran-Penarrocha, Guillermo Adolfo
    Gomez-Garcia, Silvia
    Garcia-Lopez, Hector
    Andronis, Lazaro
    Albornoz-Cabello, Manuel
    Lara Palomo, Inmaculada C.
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (12):
  • [8] The NAtional randomised controlled Trial of Tonsillectomy IN Adults (NATTINA): a clinical and cost-effectiveness study: study protocol for a randomised control trial
    Rubie, Isabel
    Haighton, Catherine
    O'Hara, James
    Rousseau, Nikki
    Steen, Nick
    Stocken, Deborah D.
    Sullivan, Frank
    Vale, Luke
    Wilkes, Scott
    Wilson, Janet
    TRIALS, 2015, 16
  • [9] The NAtional randomised controlled Trial of Tonsillectomy IN Adults (NATTINA): a clinical and cost-effectiveness study: study protocol for a randomised control trial
    Isabel Rubie
    Catherine Haighton
    James O’Hara
    Nikki Rousseau
    Nick Steen
    Deborah D. Stocken
    Frank Sullivan
    Luke Vale
    Scott Wilkes
    Janet Wilson
    Trials, 16
  • [10] Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of embedded simulation in occupational therapy clinical practice education: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    Imms, Christine
    Chu, Eli Mang Yee
    Guinea, Stephen
    Sheppard, Loretta
    Froude, Elspeth
    Carter, Rob
    Darzins, Susan
    Ashby, Samantha
    Gilbert-Hunt, Susan
    Gribble, Nigel
    Nicola-Richmond, Kelli
    Penman, Merrolee
    Gospodarevskaya, Elena
    Mathieu, Erin
    Symmons, Mark
    TRIALS, 2017, 18