Provenance and technology of Apulian Neolithic pottery

被引:12
|
作者
Laviano, Rocco [1 ]
Muntoni, Italo M. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bari, Dipartimento Geomineral, I-70125 Bari, Italy
[2] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Museo Origini, I-00185 Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Bari, Fac Sci, Dept Archaeometry, I-70125 Bari, Italy
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1144/GSL.SP.2006.257.01.04
中图分类号
K85 [文物考古];
学科分类号
0601 ;
摘要
Apulia is the best-represented region in Italy as far as archaeometric analyses of Neolithic pottery are concerned. Cross-checked use of petrological (optical microscopy), mineralogical (X-ray powder diffraction) and chemical analyses (X-ray fluorescence) have been performed, in the Dipartimento Geomineralogico of Bari University, on 375 Early to Late Neolithic (from the seventh to the fourth millennium BC) pottery samples from the Tavoliere and Murge areas. A correlated analysis of 134 samples of the main clayey deposits of the two areas was also conducted. Generally local clays were used and, in some cases, the exploitation of a range of different local fabrics has been verified. In Middle Neolithic sites, the use of non-local clay, probably imported, has been also determined. Few finished pots were actually exchanged at an inter-site scale during the Neolithic. Preparation of raw materials has shown different choices followed by ancient potters. Clays are usually more or less refined and the use of mineral temper such as sand, quartz, calcite and grog has been found. The maximum temperature reached during firing is usually between 600-700 and 850 degrees C. For some Middle Neolithic fine painted pottery higher temperatures have been suggested (between 850 and 1050 degrees C), revealing a better firing control and the use of kilns.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:49 / +
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Ceramic Neolithic pottery in Cyprus-origin, technology and possible implications for social structure and identity
    Boness, Doron
    Clarke, Joanne
    Goren, Yuval
    LEVANT, 2015, 47 (03) : 233 - 254
  • [42] NEOLITHIC PAINTED POTTERY + IN THE OSTASIATISKA-MUSEET
    GYLLENSVARD, B
    ARTS OF ASIA, 1981, 11 (06): : 74 - 81
  • [43] IRISH DECORATED NEOLITHIC POTTERY AND ITS CONTEXT
    HERITY, M
    JOURNAL OF INDO-EUROPEAN STUDIES, 1981, 9 (1-2): : 69 - 93
  • [44] TECHNOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF THE NEOLITHIC POTTERY FROM MAKRI
    YIOUNI, P
    BULLETIN DE CORRESPONDANCE HELLENIQUE, 1995, 119 (02): : 607 - 620
  • [45] Unglazed pottery from the masjed-i jom’e of Isfahan (Iran): technology and provenance
    Alberto De Bonis
    Maria D’Angelo
    Vincenza Guarino
    Serena Massa
    Faribah Saiedi Anaraki
    Bruno Genito
    Vincenzo Morra
    Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 2017, 9 : 617 - 635
  • [46] Unglazed pottery from the masjed-i jom'e of Isfahan (Iran): technology and provenance
    De Bonis, Alberto
    D'Angelo, Maria
    Guarino, Vincenza
    Massa, Serena
    Anaraki, Faribah Saiedi
    Genito, Bruno
    Morra, Vincenzo
    ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND ANTHROPOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2017, 9 (04) : 617 - 635
  • [47] Black gloss pottery:: Production sites and technology in northern Etruria, Part 1:: Provenance studies
    Gliozzo, E
    Turbanti, IM
    ARCHAEOMETRY, 2004, 46 : 201 - 225
  • [48] DSecond Iron Age grey pottery from Este (northeastern Italy): study of provenance and technology
    Maritan, L
    Mazzoli, C
    Nodari, L
    Russo, U
    APPLIED CLAY SCIENCE, 2005, 29 (01) : 31 - 44
  • [49] Rethinking final Neolithic pottery from Greece
    Kalogirou, A
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGY, 1996, 100 (02) : 351 - 351
  • [50] The earlier Neolithic in Cyprus: recognition and dating of a Pre-Pottery Neolithic A occupation
    Manning, Sturt W.
    McCartney, Carole
    Kromer, Bernd
    Stewart, Sarah T.
    ANTIQUITY, 2010, 84 (325) : 693 - 706