Provenance and technology of Apulian Neolithic pottery

被引:12
|
作者
Laviano, Rocco [1 ]
Muntoni, Italo M. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bari, Dipartimento Geomineral, I-70125 Bari, Italy
[2] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Museo Origini, I-00185 Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Bari, Fac Sci, Dept Archaeometry, I-70125 Bari, Italy
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1144/GSL.SP.2006.257.01.04
中图分类号
K85 [文物考古];
学科分类号
0601 ;
摘要
Apulia is the best-represented region in Italy as far as archaeometric analyses of Neolithic pottery are concerned. Cross-checked use of petrological (optical microscopy), mineralogical (X-ray powder diffraction) and chemical analyses (X-ray fluorescence) have been performed, in the Dipartimento Geomineralogico of Bari University, on 375 Early to Late Neolithic (from the seventh to the fourth millennium BC) pottery samples from the Tavoliere and Murge areas. A correlated analysis of 134 samples of the main clayey deposits of the two areas was also conducted. Generally local clays were used and, in some cases, the exploitation of a range of different local fabrics has been verified. In Middle Neolithic sites, the use of non-local clay, probably imported, has been also determined. Few finished pots were actually exchanged at an inter-site scale during the Neolithic. Preparation of raw materials has shown different choices followed by ancient potters. Clays are usually more or less refined and the use of mineral temper such as sand, quartz, calcite and grog has been found. The maximum temperature reached during firing is usually between 600-700 and 850 degrees C. For some Middle Neolithic fine painted pottery higher temperatures have been suggested (between 850 and 1050 degrees C), revealing a better firing control and the use of kilns.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:49 / +
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Patterns in the Production of Apulian Red-Figure Pottery
    Bundrick, Sheramy D.
    HISTORIAN, 2019, 81 (03): : 516 - 517
  • [22] Prolegomenon to the Study of Apulian Red-Figure Pottery
    Carpenter, T. H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGY, 2009, 113 (01) : 27 - 38
  • [23] Provenance analysis of pottery from the Neolithic Diaolongbei site, Hubei Province, China by using NAA and petrography analysis
    Guo, Yi
    Jiang, Quyi
    Liu, Yan
    Huang, Weidong
    Wu, Yaoli
    Yang, Yimin
    JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SCIENCE-REPORTS, 2018, 21 : 200 - 207
  • [24] Preliminary provenance research on Chinese Neolithic pottery: Huating (Xinyi County) and three Yellow River Valley sites
    Xu, AW
    Wang, CS
    Chi, JQ
    Li, MC
    Zhang, MS
    Holmes, L
    Harbottle, G
    Koshimizu, S
    Manabu, K
    Koichi, K
    ARCHAEOMETRY, 2001, 43 : 35 - 47
  • [25] Ceramic production and the transition to agriculture in Northeast China: Neolithic pottery technology in the Fuxin Region
    Goren, Yuval
    Friedlander, Lonia
    Marder, Ofer
    Shalev, Noam
    Teng, Mingyu
    Tu, Dongdong
    Shelach-Lavi, Gideon
    ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND ANTHROPOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2024, 16 (01)
  • [26] Neolithic and chalcolithic pottery of the southern Levant
    van den Brink, ECM
    ISRAEL EXPLORATION JOURNAL, 2002, 52 (01) : 102 - 105
  • [27] Neolithic and Chalcolithic pottery of the southern Levant
    Bernbeck, R
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGY, 2001, 105 (04) : 728 - 729
  • [28] Neolithic and Chalcolithic pottery of the Southern Levant
    Joffe, AH
    JOURNAL OF NEAR EASTERN STUDIES, 2003, 62 (01) : 34 - 35
  • [29] Ceramic production and the transition to agriculture in Northeast China: Neolithic pottery technology in the Fuxin Region
    Yuval Goren
    Lonia Friedlander
    Ofer Marder
    Noam Shalev
    Mingyu Teng
    Dongdong Tu
    Gideon Shelach-Lavi
    Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 2024, 16
  • [30] Pottery Neolithic landscape modification at Dhra'
    Kuijt, Ian
    Finlayson, Bill
    MacKay, Jode
    ANTIQUITY, 2007, 81 (311) : 106 - 118