Clinical Outcomes of Proximal Gastrectomy versus Total Gastrectomy for Proximal Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:22
|
作者
Zhao, Lulu [1 ]
Ling, Rui [2 ]
Chen, Jinghua [1 ]
Shi, Anchen [3 ]
Chai, Changpeng [4 ]
Ma, Fuhai [1 ]
Zhao, Dongbing [1 ]
Chen, Yingtai [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Natl Canc Ctr, Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc, Canc Hosp, 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Beijing 100021, Peoples R China
[2] Georgetown Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Microbiol & Immunol, Washington, DC 20007 USA
[3] Lanzhou Univ, Clin Med Coll 2, Lanzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Lanzhou Univ, Hosp 1, Gen Surg, Clin Med Coll 1, Lanzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
Proximal gastric cancer; Proximal gastrectomy; Total gastrectomy; Survival; Meta-analysis; DOUBLE-TRACT RECONSTRUCTION; UPPER; 3RD; INTERPOSITION; ESOPHAGOGASTROSTOMY; ADENOCARCINOMA; TRIALS; REFLUX; POUCH;
D O I
10.1159/000506104
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: The extent of optimal gastric resection for proximal gastric cancer (PGC) continues to remain controversial, and a final consensus is yet to be met. The current study aimed to compare the perioperative outcomes, postoperative complications, and overall survival (OS) of proximal gastrectomy (PG) versus total gastrectomy (TG) in the treatment of PGC through a meta-analysis. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for articles published in English since database establishment to October 2019. Evaluated endpoints were perioperative outcomes, postoperative complications, and long-term survival outcomes. Results: A total of 2,896 patients in 25 full-text articles were included, of which one was a prospective randomized study, one was a clinical phase III trial, and the rest were retrospective comparative studies. The PG group showed a higher incidence of anastomotic stenosis (OR = 2.21 [95% CI: 1.08-4.50]; p = 0.03) and reflux symptoms (OR = 3.33 [95% CI: 1.85-5.99]; p < 0.001) when compared with the TG group, while no difference was found in PG patients with double-tract reconstruction (DTR). The retrieved lymph nodes were clearly more in the TG group (WMD = -10.46 [95% CI: -12.76 to -8.17]; p < 0.001). The PG group was associated with a better 5-year OS relative to TG with 11 included studies (OR = 1.35 [95% CI: 1.03-1.77]; p = 0.03). After stratification for early gastric cancer and PG with DTR groups, however, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups (OR = 1.35 [95% CI: 0.59-2.45]; p = 0.62). Conclusion: In conclusion, PG was associated with a visible improved long-term survival outcome for all irrespective of tumor stage, while a similar 5-year OS for only early gastric cancer patients between the 2 groups. Future randomized clinical trials of esophagojejunostomy techniques, such as DTR following PG, are expected to prevent postoperative complications and assist surgeons in the choice of surgical approach for PGC patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 13
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Subtotal versus total gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
    Otsuka, Ryota
    Hayano, Koichi
    Yoshida, Masahiro
    Goto, Hironobu
    Muneoka, Yusuke
    Nunobe, Souya
    Matsubara, Hisahiro
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2021, 406 (05) : 1379 - 1385
  • [42] Subtotal versus total gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
    Ryota Otsuka
    Koichi Hayano
    Masahiro Yoshida
    Hironobu Goto
    Yusuke Muneoka
    Souya Nunobe
    Hisahiro Matsubara
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 2021, 406 : 1379 - 1385
  • [43] The comparison of long-term oncological outcomes and complications after proximal gastrectomy with double tract reconstruction versus total gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer
    Ying, Keming
    Bai, Weisong
    Yan, Guiru
    Xu, Ziseng
    Du, Shenheng
    Dang, Chengxue
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 21 (01)
  • [44] Proximal versus total gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program database analysis
    Wei, Jianchang
    Yang, Ping
    Huang, Qing
    Chen, Zhuanpeng
    Zhang, Tong
    He, Feng
    Hu, He
    Zhong, Junbin
    Li, Wanglin
    Wei, Fang
    Wang, Qiang
    Cao, Jie
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2021, 17 (10) : 1185 - 1195
  • [45] The comparison of long-term oncological outcomes and complications after proximal gastrectomy with double tract reconstruction versus total gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer
    Keming Ying
    Weisong Bai
    Guiru Yan
    Ziseng Xu
    Shenheng Du
    Chengxue Dang
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 21
  • [46] Effects of reconstruction techniques after proximal gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zakari Shaibu
    Zhihong Chen
    Said Abdulrahman Salim Mzee
    Acquah Theophilus
    Isah Adamu Danbala
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 18
  • [47] Effects of reconstruction techniques after proximal gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shaibu, Zakari
    Chen, Zhihong
    Mzee, Said Abdulrahman Salim
    Theophilus, Acquah
    Danbala, Isah Adamu
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 18 (01)
  • [48] Does Total Gastrectomy Provide Better Outcomes than Distal Subtotal Gastrectomy for Distal Gastric Cancer? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Qi, Jin
    Zhang, Peng
    Wang, Yanan
    Chen, Hao
    Li, Yumin
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (10):
  • [49] Totally Laparoscopic Gastrectomy Versus Laparoscopic-Assisted Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Meng, Xiangyu
    Wang, Lu
    Zhu, Bo
    Sun, Ting
    Guo, Shuai
    Wang, Yue
    Zhang, Jun
    Yang, Dong
    Zheng, Guoliang
    Zhang, Tao
    Zheng, Zhichao
    Zhao, Yan
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2021, 31 (06): : 676 - 691
  • [50] Surgical and oncological outcomes of distal gastrectomy compared to total gastrectomy for middle-third gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jiang, Yuxing
    Yang, Fan
    Ma, Jingfu
    Zhang, Ning
    Zhang, Chao
    Li, Gaoming
    Li, Zhengyan
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2022, 24 (03)