Clinical Outcomes of Proximal Gastrectomy versus Total Gastrectomy for Proximal Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:22
|
作者
Zhao, Lulu [1 ]
Ling, Rui [2 ]
Chen, Jinghua [1 ]
Shi, Anchen [3 ]
Chai, Changpeng [4 ]
Ma, Fuhai [1 ]
Zhao, Dongbing [1 ]
Chen, Yingtai [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Natl Canc Ctr, Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc, Canc Hosp, 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Beijing 100021, Peoples R China
[2] Georgetown Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Microbiol & Immunol, Washington, DC 20007 USA
[3] Lanzhou Univ, Clin Med Coll 2, Lanzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Lanzhou Univ, Hosp 1, Gen Surg, Clin Med Coll 1, Lanzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
Proximal gastric cancer; Proximal gastrectomy; Total gastrectomy; Survival; Meta-analysis; DOUBLE-TRACT RECONSTRUCTION; UPPER; 3RD; INTERPOSITION; ESOPHAGOGASTROSTOMY; ADENOCARCINOMA; TRIALS; REFLUX; POUCH;
D O I
10.1159/000506104
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: The extent of optimal gastric resection for proximal gastric cancer (PGC) continues to remain controversial, and a final consensus is yet to be met. The current study aimed to compare the perioperative outcomes, postoperative complications, and overall survival (OS) of proximal gastrectomy (PG) versus total gastrectomy (TG) in the treatment of PGC through a meta-analysis. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for articles published in English since database establishment to October 2019. Evaluated endpoints were perioperative outcomes, postoperative complications, and long-term survival outcomes. Results: A total of 2,896 patients in 25 full-text articles were included, of which one was a prospective randomized study, one was a clinical phase III trial, and the rest were retrospective comparative studies. The PG group showed a higher incidence of anastomotic stenosis (OR = 2.21 [95% CI: 1.08-4.50]; p = 0.03) and reflux symptoms (OR = 3.33 [95% CI: 1.85-5.99]; p < 0.001) when compared with the TG group, while no difference was found in PG patients with double-tract reconstruction (DTR). The retrieved lymph nodes were clearly more in the TG group (WMD = -10.46 [95% CI: -12.76 to -8.17]; p < 0.001). The PG group was associated with a better 5-year OS relative to TG with 11 included studies (OR = 1.35 [95% CI: 1.03-1.77]; p = 0.03). After stratification for early gastric cancer and PG with DTR groups, however, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups (OR = 1.35 [95% CI: 0.59-2.45]; p = 0.62). Conclusion: In conclusion, PG was associated with a visible improved long-term survival outcome for all irrespective of tumor stage, while a similar 5-year OS for only early gastric cancer patients between the 2 groups. Future randomized clinical trials of esophagojejunostomy techniques, such as DTR following PG, are expected to prevent postoperative complications and assist surgeons in the choice of surgical approach for PGC patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 13
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] IS PROXIMAL GASTRECTOMY SUPERIOR TO TOTAL GASTRECTOMY FOR PROXIMAL GASTRIC-CARCINOMA
    TSUJITANI, S
    KAKEJI, Y
    WATANABE, A
    MAEHARA, Y
    FURUSAWA, M
    SUGIMACHI, K
    DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 1992, 9 (01) : 13 - 18
  • [32] Total gastrectomy is not necessary for proximal gastric cancer
    Harrison, LE
    Schwarz, RE
    Karpeh, MS
    Brennan, MF
    PROGRESS IN GASTRIC CANCER RESEARCH 1997: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL GASTRIC CANCER CONGRESS, 1997, : 929 - 933
  • [33] Validation of a novel reconstruction method of laparoscopic gastrectomy for proximal early gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yixin Xu
    Jie Gao
    Yibo Wang
    Yulin Tan
    Cheng Xi
    Nianyuan Ye
    Dapeng Wu
    Xuezhong Xu
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 18
  • [34] Validation of a novel reconstruction method of laparoscopic gastrectomy for proximal early gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xu, Yixin
    Gao, Jie
    Wang, Yibo
    Tan, Yulin
    Xi, Cheng
    Ye, Nianyuan
    Wu, Dapeng
    Xu, Xuezhong
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 18 (01)
  • [35] Laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for elderly patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jin-fa Wang
    Song-ze Zhang
    Neng-yun Zhang
    Zong-yang Wu
    Ji-ye Feng
    Li-ping Ying
    Jing-jing Zhang
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 14
  • [36] Laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for elderly patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Jin-fa
    Zhang, Song-ze
    Zhang, Neng-yun
    Wu, Zong-yang
    Feng, Ji-ye
    Ying, Li-ping
    Zhang, Jing-jing
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 14
  • [37] Outcomes of Proximal Versus Total Gastrectomy for Proximal Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of a Western Center Experience
    Tevfik Kıvılcım Uprak
    Muhammer Ergenç
    Ahmet Akmercan
    Cumhur Yeğen
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2023, 27 : 1560 - 1567
  • [38] Outcomes of Proximal Versus Total Gastrectomy for Proximal Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of a Western Center Experience
    Uprak, Tevfik Kivilcim
    Ergenc, Muhammer
    Akmercan, Ahmet
    Yegen, Cumhur
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2023, 27 (08) : 1560 - 1567
  • [39] Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jianglei Ma
    Xiaoyao Li
    Shifu Zhao
    Ruifu Zhang
    Dejun Yang
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 18
  • [40] Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ma, Jianglei
    Li, Xiaoyao
    Zhao, Shifu
    Zhang, Ruifu
    Yang, Dejun
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 18 (01)