Clinical Outcomes of Proximal Gastrectomy versus Total Gastrectomy for Proximal Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:22
|
作者
Zhao, Lulu [1 ]
Ling, Rui [2 ]
Chen, Jinghua [1 ]
Shi, Anchen [3 ]
Chai, Changpeng [4 ]
Ma, Fuhai [1 ]
Zhao, Dongbing [1 ]
Chen, Yingtai [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Natl Canc Ctr, Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc, Canc Hosp, 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Beijing 100021, Peoples R China
[2] Georgetown Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Microbiol & Immunol, Washington, DC 20007 USA
[3] Lanzhou Univ, Clin Med Coll 2, Lanzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Lanzhou Univ, Hosp 1, Gen Surg, Clin Med Coll 1, Lanzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
Proximal gastric cancer; Proximal gastrectomy; Total gastrectomy; Survival; Meta-analysis; DOUBLE-TRACT RECONSTRUCTION; UPPER; 3RD; INTERPOSITION; ESOPHAGOGASTROSTOMY; ADENOCARCINOMA; TRIALS; REFLUX; POUCH;
D O I
10.1159/000506104
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: The extent of optimal gastric resection for proximal gastric cancer (PGC) continues to remain controversial, and a final consensus is yet to be met. The current study aimed to compare the perioperative outcomes, postoperative complications, and overall survival (OS) of proximal gastrectomy (PG) versus total gastrectomy (TG) in the treatment of PGC through a meta-analysis. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for articles published in English since database establishment to October 2019. Evaluated endpoints were perioperative outcomes, postoperative complications, and long-term survival outcomes. Results: A total of 2,896 patients in 25 full-text articles were included, of which one was a prospective randomized study, one was a clinical phase III trial, and the rest were retrospective comparative studies. The PG group showed a higher incidence of anastomotic stenosis (OR = 2.21 [95% CI: 1.08-4.50]; p = 0.03) and reflux symptoms (OR = 3.33 [95% CI: 1.85-5.99]; p < 0.001) when compared with the TG group, while no difference was found in PG patients with double-tract reconstruction (DTR). The retrieved lymph nodes were clearly more in the TG group (WMD = -10.46 [95% CI: -12.76 to -8.17]; p < 0.001). The PG group was associated with a better 5-year OS relative to TG with 11 included studies (OR = 1.35 [95% CI: 1.03-1.77]; p = 0.03). After stratification for early gastric cancer and PG with DTR groups, however, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups (OR = 1.35 [95% CI: 0.59-2.45]; p = 0.62). Conclusion: In conclusion, PG was associated with a visible improved long-term survival outcome for all irrespective of tumor stage, while a similar 5-year OS for only early gastric cancer patients between the 2 groups. Future randomized clinical trials of esophagojejunostomy techniques, such as DTR following PG, are expected to prevent postoperative complications and assist surgeons in the choice of surgical approach for PGC patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 13
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy Versus Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy for Proximal Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Tian, Peirong
    Liu, Yang
    Bian, Shibo
    Li, Mengyi
    Zhang, Meng
    Liu, Jia
    Jin, Lan
    Zhang, Peng
    Zhang, Zhongtao
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 10
  • [2] Proximal versus total gastrectomy for proximal early gastric cancer A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xu, Yixin
    Tan, Yulin
    Wang, Yibo
    Xi, Cheng
    Ye, Nianyuan
    Xu, Xuezhong
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (19)
  • [3] Proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction versus total gastrectomy for proximal early gastric cancer A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xiang, Renshen
    Song, Wei
    Ren, Jun
    Lu, Wei
    Zhang, Heng
    Fu, Tao
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (45) : E27818
  • [4] Total vs. Proximal Gastrectomy for Proximal Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Wen, Lei
    Chen, Xin-Zu
    Wu, Bin
    Chen, Xiao-Long
    Wang, Li
    Yang, Kun
    Zhang, Bo
    Chen, Zhi-Xin
    Chen, Jia-Ping
    Zhou, Zong-Guang
    Li, Chun-Mei
    Hu, Jian-Kun
    HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 59 (114) : 633 - 640
  • [5] Clinical outcomes of proximal gastrectomy versus total gastrectomy for locally advanced proximal gastric cancer: a propensity score matching analysis
    Zhao, Ulu
    Ling, Rui
    Ma, Fuhai
    Ren, Hu
    Zhou, Hong
    Wang, Tongbo
    Chen, Yingtai
    Hu, Shangying
    Zhao, Dongbing
    TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 9 (04) : 2769 - +
  • [6] Clinical outcomes of proximal gastrectomy versus total gastrectomy for locally advanced proximal gastric cancer: a propensity score matching analysis
    Chen, Y.
    Zhao, L.
    Hu, S.
    Zhao, D.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2019, 30
  • [7] Clinical outcome of proximal versus total gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer
    Shiraishi, N
    Adachi, Y
    Kitano, S
    Kakisako, K
    Inomata, M
    Yasuda, K
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2002, 26 (09) : 1150 - 1154
  • [8] Clinical Outcome of Proximal versus Total Gastrectomy for Proximal Gastric Cancer
    Norio Shiraishi
    Yosuke Adachi
    Seigo Kitano
    Kenji Kakisako
    Masafumi Inomata
    Kazuhiro Yasuda
    World Journal of Surgery, 2002, 26 : 1150 - 1154
  • [9] Surgical and nutritional outcomes of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy versus total gastrectomy: a meta-analysis
    Tanioka, Toshiro
    Waratchanont, Rawat
    Fukuyo, Ryosuke
    Saito, Toshifumi
    Umebayashi, Yuya
    Kanemoto, Emi
    Kobayashi, Kenta
    Nakagawa, Masatoshi
    Inokuchi, Mikito
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 34 (03): : 1061 - 1069
  • [10] Surgical and nutritional outcomes of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy versus total gastrectomy: a meta-analysis
    Toshiro Tanioka
    Rawat Waratchanont
    Ryosuke Fukuyo
    Toshifumi Saito
    Yuya Umebayashi
    Emi Kanemoto
    Kenta Kobayashi
    Masatoshi Nakagawa
    Mikito Inokuchi
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2020, 34 : 1061 - 1069