Urban service co-production and technology: nine key issues

被引:3
|
作者
Faldi, Giuseppe [1 ]
Ranzato, Marco [2 ]
Moretto, Luisa [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Libre Bruxelles ULB, Fac Architecture La Cambre Horta, Pl Flagey,19 ULB CP 248-01, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Roma Tre Univ, Dept Architecture, Rome, Italy
关键词
Co-production; urban service; technology; socio-technical; knowledge coproduction; intermediaries; equity; global south; WATER; PARTICIPATION; ENGAGEMENT; INFRASTRUCTURE; CHALLENGES; MANAGEMENT; INSIGHTS; SYSTEMS; STATE; POWER;
D O I
10.1080/19463138.2022.2060237
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This special issue investigates the role of technology in the co-production of urban services through six empirical articles based on case-studies from Asia, Africa and South America. This topic has not received yet extensive attention in the literature, despite the emergence of technology as the key mediator between the material and immaterial elements of co-production practice. Based on the analysis of the six contributions, this introductory paper presents nine key issues related to the role of technology in service co-production, which are considered from four analytical perspectives: materiality, knowledge, actors and outcome. Technology co-evolves with physical contexts and practices. It fosters synergic knowledge generation, while also being the product of its own application. It contributes to changing governance structures and the emergence of new intermediary actors. Finally, technology influences power dynamics and equality of access to service, resulting in service provision that may be inclusionary or exclusionary, emancipatory or restrictive.
引用
收藏
页码:146 / 161
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Greening Berlin: The Co-Production of Science, Politics, and Urban Nature
    Gandy, Matthew
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PLANNING EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, 2014, 34 (04) : 480 - 481
  • [32] Understanding core IS capabilities throughout the IS/IT service co-production lifecycle
    Kasraian, Laleh
    Sammon, David
    Grace, Audrey
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DECISION SYSTEMS, 2016, 25 : 290 - 301
  • [33] Integrating climate service co-production into spatial planning in Jakarta
    Putra, Arya Lahasa
    Martinez, Javier
    Verplanke, Jeroen
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF URBAN SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2020,
  • [34] The impact of co-production on frontline accountability: the case of the conciliation service
    Tuurnas, Sanna
    Stenvall, Jari
    Rannisto, Pasi-Heikki
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, 2016, 82 (01) : 131 - 149
  • [35] Co-production and Service Quality: The Case of Cooperative Childcare in Sweden
    Vamstad, Johan
    [J]. VOLUNTAS, 2012, 23 (04): : 1173 - 1188
  • [36] Co-production of service experiences: insights from the cultural sector
    Minkiewicz, Joanna
    Bridson, Kerrie
    Evans, Jody
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SERVICES MARKETING, 2016, 30 (07) : 749 - 761
  • [37] Challenges of water and sanitation service co-production in the global South
    Moretto, Luisa
    Faldi, Giuseppe
    Ranzato, Marco
    Rosati, Federica Natalia
    Boozi, Jean-Pierre Ilito
    Teller, Jacques
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND URBANIZATION, 2018, 30 (02) : 425 - 443
  • [38] User co-production of public service delivery: An uncertainty approach
    Fledderus, Joost
    Brandsen, Taco
    Honingh, Marlies Elisabeth
    [J]. PUBLIC POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION, 2015, 30 (02) : 145 - 164
  • [39] A Framework for Data-Driven Public Service Co-production
    Toots, Maarja
    McBride, Keegan
    Kalvet, Tarmo
    Krimmer, Robert
    Tambouris, Efthimios
    Panopoulou, Eleni
    Kalampokis, Evangelos
    Tarabanis, Konstantinos
    [J]. ELECTRONIC GOVERNMENT (EGOV 2017), 2017, 10428 : 264 - 275
  • [40] Integrating climate service co-production into spatial planning in Jakarta
    Putra, Arya Lahasa
    Martinez, Javier
    Verplanke, Jeroen
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF URBAN SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 14 (01) : 225 - 241