Urban service co-production and technology: nine key issues

被引:3
|
作者
Faldi, Giuseppe [1 ]
Ranzato, Marco [2 ]
Moretto, Luisa [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Libre Bruxelles ULB, Fac Architecture La Cambre Horta, Pl Flagey,19 ULB CP 248-01, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Roma Tre Univ, Dept Architecture, Rome, Italy
关键词
Co-production; urban service; technology; socio-technical; knowledge coproduction; intermediaries; equity; global south; WATER; PARTICIPATION; ENGAGEMENT; INFRASTRUCTURE; CHALLENGES; MANAGEMENT; INSIGHTS; SYSTEMS; STATE; POWER;
D O I
10.1080/19463138.2022.2060237
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This special issue investigates the role of technology in the co-production of urban services through six empirical articles based on case-studies from Asia, Africa and South America. This topic has not received yet extensive attention in the literature, despite the emergence of technology as the key mediator between the material and immaterial elements of co-production practice. Based on the analysis of the six contributions, this introductory paper presents nine key issues related to the role of technology in service co-production, which are considered from four analytical perspectives: materiality, knowledge, actors and outcome. Technology co-evolves with physical contexts and practices. It fosters synergic knowledge generation, while also being the product of its own application. It contributes to changing governance structures and the emergence of new intermediary actors. Finally, technology influences power dynamics and equality of access to service, resulting in service provision that may be inclusionary or exclusionary, emancipatory or restrictive.
引用
收藏
页码:146 / 161
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Disentangling the Pathways and Effects of Ecosystem Service Co-Production
    Palomo, Ignacio
    Felipe-Lucia, Maria R.
    Bennett, Elena M.
    Martin-Lopez, Berta
    Pascual, Unai
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES: FROM BIODIVERSITY TO SOCIETY, PT 2, 2016, 54 : 245 - 283
  • [12] Building trust through public service co-production
    Fledderus, Joost
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT, 2015, 28 (07) : 550 - 565
  • [13] Co-production in the recruitment of frontline public service employees
    Trischler, Jakob
    Kaluza, Johan
    [J]. POLICY AND POLITICS, 2021, 49 (03): : 473 - 491
  • [14] Understanding Innovation in Education: A Service Co-Production Perspective
    Rubalcaba, Luis
    [J]. ECONOMIES, 2022, 10 (05)
  • [15] The Role of Customer Knowledge in Service Co-Production Throughout the IS/IT Service LifeCycle
    Kasraian, Laleh
    Sammon, David
    Grace, Audrey
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 16TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT (ECKM 2015), 2015, : 1005 - 1007
  • [16] How is urban co-production conveyed in European cities?
    Bragaglia, Francesca
    Rivolin, Umberto Janin
    Berisha, Erblin
    Cotella, Giancarlo
    [J]. EUROPEAN PLANNING STUDIES, 2024, 32 (07) : 1613 - 1631
  • [17] Robust demand service achievement for the co-production newsvendor
    Tsan Sheng Ng
    Fowler, John
    Mok, Ivy
    [J]. IIE TRANSACTIONS, 2012, 44 (05) : 327 - 341
  • [18] Urban geography of arts: The co-production of arts and cities
    Guinard, Pauline
    Molina, Geraldine
    [J]. CITIES, 2018, 77 : 1 - 3
  • [19] Co-production for innovation: the urban living lab experience
    Nesti, Giorgia
    [J]. POLICY AND SOCIETY, 2018, 37 (03) : 310 - 325
  • [20] Co-production helps ensure that new technology succeeds
    Dobson, Juliet
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 366