Single- and Multi-Channel Modulation Detection in Cochlear Implant Users

被引:9
|
作者
Galvin, John J., III [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Oba, Sandy [1 ,2 ]
Fu, Qian-Jie [1 ,2 ]
Baskent, Deniz [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] House Res Inst, Div Commun & Auditory Neurosci, Los Angeles, CA 90057 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Head & Neck Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[3] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Groningen, Netherlands
[4] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Grad Sch Med Sci, Res Sch Behav & Cognit Neurosci, Groningen, Netherlands
来源
PLOS ONE | 2014年 / 9卷 / 06期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
CARRIER PULSE-RATE; AMPLITUDE-MODULATION; INTENSITY DISCRIMINATION; SPEECH RECOGNITION; STIMULATION RATE; LOUDNESS; PERCEPTION; LISTENERS; NOISE; SITE;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0099338
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Single-channel modulation detection thresholds (MDTs) have been shown to predict cochlear implant (CI) users' speech performance. However, little is known about multi-channel modulation sensitivity. Two factors likely contribute to multichannel modulation sensitivity: multichannel loudness summation and the across-site variance in single-channel MDTs. In this study, single- and multi-channel MDTs were measured in 9 CI users at relatively low and high presentation levels and modulation frequencies. Single-channel MDTs were measured at widely spaced electrode locations, and these same channels were used for the multichannel stimuli. Multichannel MDTs were measured twice, with and without adjustment for multichannel loudness summation (i.e., at the same loudness as for the single-channel MDTs or louder). Results showed that the effect of presentation level and modulation frequency were similar for single- and multi-channel MDTs. Multichannel MDTs were significantly poorer than single-channel MDTs when the current levels of the multichannel stimuli were reduced to match the loudness of the single-channel stimuli. This suggests that, at equal loudness, single-channel measures may over-estimate CI users' multichannel modulation sensitivity. At equal loudness, there was no significant correlation between the amount of multichannel loudness summation and the deficit in multichannel MDTs, relative to the average single-channel MDT. With no loudness compensation, multichannel MDTs were significantly better than the best single-channel MDT. The across-site variance in single-channel MDTs varied substantially across subjects. However, the across-site variance was not correlated with the multichannel advantage over the best single channel. This suggests that CI listeners combined envelope information across channels instead of attending to the best channel.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effects of Stimulation Rate, Mode and Level on Modulation Detection by Cochlear Implant Users
    John J. Galvin
    Qian-Jie Fu
    Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 2005, 6 : 269 - 279
  • [22] SPEECH-PERCEPTION BY 4 SINGLE-CHANNEL COCHLEAR IMPLANT USERS
    DENT, LJ
    SIMMONS, FB
    WHITE, RL
    ROBERTS, LA
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1987, 30 (04): : 480 - 493
  • [23] From single- to multi-channel systems: Advancing handwriting forgery detection with triboelectric nanogenerator arrays
    Chen, Sicheng
    Tang, Yuanbin
    Liu, Mingxin
    Deng, Linfeng
    Yang, Lei
    Zhang, Weiqiang
    NANO ENERGY, 2025, 139
  • [24] Multi-Channel Comb Modulation in Single Waveguide Structures
    Mazur, Mikael
    Fontaine, Nicolas K.
    Chen, Haoshuo
    Ryf, Roland
    Neilson, David T.
    Raybon, Gregory
    Adamiecki, Andrew
    Corteselli, Steve
    Schroeder, Jochen
    2020 EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS (ECOC), 2020,
  • [25] Spread of Excitation and Channel Interaction in Single- and Dual-Electrode Cochlear Implant Stimulation
    Snel-Bongers, Jorien
    Briaire, Jeroen J.
    Vanpoucke, Filiep J.
    Frijns, Johan H. M.
    EAR AND HEARING, 2012, 33 (03): : 367 - 376
  • [26] Single- and Multi-Channel Nonlinear Phenomena in Resonant Structures Comprising Graphene
    Tsilipakos, O.
    Christopoulos, T.
    Sinatkas, G.
    Kriezis, E. E.
    2019 THIRTEENTH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON ARTIFICIAL MATERIALS FOR NOVEL WAVE PHENOMENA (METAMATERIALS)), 2019, : 435 - 437
  • [27] Discrimination of Stochastic Frequency Modulation by Cochlear Implant Users
    Sheft, Stanley
    Cheng, Min-Yu
    Shafiro, Valeriy
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY, 2015, 26 (06) : 572 - 581
  • [28] Split-step solitons in single- and multi-channel fiber links
    Driben, R
    Malomed, BA
    OPTICAL PULSE AND BEAM PROPAGATION III, 2001, 4271 : 248 - 259
  • [29] Channel weights for speech recognition in cochlear implant users
    Mehr, MA
    Turner, CW
    Parkinson, A
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2001, 109 (01): : 359 - 366
  • [30] Relationship Between Peripheral and Psychophysical Measures of Amplitude Modulation Detection in Cochlear Implant Users
    Tejani, Viral D.
    Abbas, Paul J.
    Brown, Carolyn J.
    EAR AND HEARING, 2017, 38 (05): : E268 - E284