Single- and Multi-Channel Modulation Detection in Cochlear Implant Users

被引:9
|
作者
Galvin, John J., III [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Oba, Sandy [1 ,2 ]
Fu, Qian-Jie [1 ,2 ]
Baskent, Deniz [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] House Res Inst, Div Commun & Auditory Neurosci, Los Angeles, CA 90057 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Head & Neck Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[3] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Groningen, Netherlands
[4] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Grad Sch Med Sci, Res Sch Behav & Cognit Neurosci, Groningen, Netherlands
来源
PLOS ONE | 2014年 / 9卷 / 06期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
CARRIER PULSE-RATE; AMPLITUDE-MODULATION; INTENSITY DISCRIMINATION; SPEECH RECOGNITION; STIMULATION RATE; LOUDNESS; PERCEPTION; LISTENERS; NOISE; SITE;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0099338
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Single-channel modulation detection thresholds (MDTs) have been shown to predict cochlear implant (CI) users' speech performance. However, little is known about multi-channel modulation sensitivity. Two factors likely contribute to multichannel modulation sensitivity: multichannel loudness summation and the across-site variance in single-channel MDTs. In this study, single- and multi-channel MDTs were measured in 9 CI users at relatively low and high presentation levels and modulation frequencies. Single-channel MDTs were measured at widely spaced electrode locations, and these same channels were used for the multichannel stimuli. Multichannel MDTs were measured twice, with and without adjustment for multichannel loudness summation (i.e., at the same loudness as for the single-channel MDTs or louder). Results showed that the effect of presentation level and modulation frequency were similar for single- and multi-channel MDTs. Multichannel MDTs were significantly poorer than single-channel MDTs when the current levels of the multichannel stimuli were reduced to match the loudness of the single-channel stimuli. This suggests that, at equal loudness, single-channel measures may over-estimate CI users' multichannel modulation sensitivity. At equal loudness, there was no significant correlation between the amount of multichannel loudness summation and the deficit in multichannel MDTs, relative to the average single-channel MDT. With no loudness compensation, multichannel MDTs were significantly better than the best single-channel MDT. The across-site variance in single-channel MDTs varied substantially across subjects. However, the across-site variance was not correlated with the multichannel advantage over the best single channel. This suggests that CI listeners combined envelope information across channels instead of attending to the best channel.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Envelope Interactions in Multi-Channel Amplitude Modulation Frequency Discrimination by Cochlear Implant Users
    Galvin, John J., III
    Oba, Sandra I.
    Baskent, Deniz
    Chatterjee, Monita
    Fu, Qian-Jie
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (10):
  • [2] Binaural Unmasking of Multi-channel Stimuli in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users
    Van Deun, Lieselot
    van Wieringen, Astrid
    Francart, Tom
    Buechner, Andreas
    Lenarz, Thomas
    Wouters, Jan
    JARO-JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2011, 12 (05): : 659 - 670
  • [3] Binaural Unmasking of Multi-channel Stimuli in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users
    Lieselot Van Deun
    Astrid van Wieringen
    Tom Francart
    Andreas Büchner
    Thomas Lenarz
    Jan Wouters
    Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 2011, 12
  • [4] Multi-channel Convolutional Neural Networks for Automatic Detection of Speech Deficits in Cochlear Implant Users
    Arias-Vergara, Tomas
    Vasquez-Correa, Juan Camilo
    Gollwitzer, Sandra
    Orozco-Arroyave, Juan Rafael
    Schuster, Maria
    Noeth, Elmar
    PROGRESS IN PATTERN RECOGNITION, IMAGE ANALYSIS, COMPUTER VISION, AND APPLICATIONS (CIARP 2019), 2019, 11896 : 679 - 687
  • [5] Temporal Pitch Perception of Multi-Channel Stimuli by Cochlear-Implant Users
    de Groote, Evelien
    Macherey, Olivier
    Deeks, John M.
    Roman, Stephane
    Carlyon, Robert P.
    JARO-JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2025,
  • [6] A multi-mode and multi-channel cochlear implant
    Zhang, C
    Wang, ZH
    Li, DM
    Dong, M
    2004 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SIGNAL PROCESSING PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1-3, 2004, : 2237 - 2240
  • [7] IOWA COCHLEAR IMPLANT CLINICAL PROJECT - RESULTS WITH 2 SINGLE-CHANNEL COCHLEAR IMPLANTS AND ONE MULTI-CHANNEL COCHLEAR IMPLANT
    GANTZ, BJ
    TYLER, RS
    PREECE, J
    MCCABE, BF
    LOWDER, MW
    OTTO, SR
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 1985, 95 (04): : 443 - 449
  • [8] Rate modulation detection thresholds for cochlear implant users
    Brochier, Tim
    McKay, Colette
    McDermott, Hugh
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2018, 143 (02): : 1214 - 1222
  • [9] Frequency modulation detection with simultaneous amplitude modulation by cochlear implant users
    Luo, Xin
    Fu, Qian-Jie
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2007, 122 (02): : 1046 - 1054
  • [10] Spectrotemporal Modulation Detection and Speech Perception by Cochlear Implant Users
    Won, Jong Ho
    Moon, Il Joon
    Jin, Sunhwa
    Park, Heesung
    Woo, Jihwan
    Cho, Yang-Sun
    Chung, Won-Ho
    Hong, Sung Hwa
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (10):