Vibrotactile evaluation: Osseointegrated versus socket-suspended transfemoral prostheses

被引:47
|
作者
Haggstrom, Eva [1 ,2 ]
Hagberg, Kerstin [1 ,2 ]
Rydevik, Bjorn [2 ]
Branemark, Rickard [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Univ Hosp, Dept Prosthet & Orthot, SE-41285 Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Univ Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, SE-41285 Gothenburg, Sweden
来源
关键词
artificial limb; osseointegration; osseoperception; prosthesis; prosthetic foot; prosthetic knee; sensibility test; transfemoral amputation; vibrometric measurement; vibrotactile sensibility; TRANS-FEMORAL AMPUTEE; AMPUTATION PROSTHESES; REHABILITATION; VIBRATION; IMPLANTS; GAIT; STIMULATION; PERCEPTION; NEUROPATHY; ANCHORAGE;
D O I
10.1682/JRRD.2012.08.0135
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
This study investigated detection thresholds of vibrometric stimuli in patients with transfemoral amputation supplied with osseointegrated (OI) and socket-suspended prostheses. It included 17 patients tested preoperatively with socket-suspended prostheses and after 2 yr with OI prostheses and a control group (n = 17) using socket-suspended prostheses, evaluated once. Assessments on the prosthetic and intact feet were conducted at six frequencies (8, 16, 32, 64, 125, and 250 Hz). Furthermore, measurements were conducted to investigate how vibrometric signals are transmitted through a test prosthesis. The results showed that the OI group had improved ability to detect vibrations through the prosthesis at 125 Hz (p = 0.01) at follow-up compared with the preoperative measurement. Compared with the control group, the 01 group at follow-up had better ability to detect high frequency vibrations through the prosthesis (125 Hz, p = 0.02; 250 Hz, p = 0.03). The vibrometric signal transmitted through the test prosthesis was reduced at 8, 125, and 250 Hz but was amplified at 16, 32, and 64 Hz. Differences between the OI and the control groups were found in the highest frequencies in which the test prosthesis showed reduction of the vibrometric signal. The study provides insight into the mechanisms of vibration transmission between the exterior and bone-anchored as well as socket-suspended amputation prostheses.
引用
收藏
页码:1423 / 1434
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quality of life of persons with transfemoral amputation: Comparison of socket prostheses and osseointegrated prostheses
    Pospiech, Philip Thomas
    Wendlandt, Robert
    Aschoff, Horst-Heinrich
    Ziegert, Sibylle
    Schulz, Arndt Peter
    PROSTHETICS AND ORTHOTICS INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 45 (01) : 20 - 25
  • [2] The influence of prosthetic suspension on gait and cortical modulations is persons with a transfemoral amputation: socket-suspended versus bone-anchored prosthesis
    Vera Kooiman
    Joris van der Cruijsen
    Ruud Leijendekkers
    Nico Verdonschot
    Teodoro Solis-Escalante
    Vivian Weerdesteyn
    Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 21
  • [3] Comparison of prosthetic costs and service between osseointegrated and conventional suspended transfemoral prostheses
    Haggstrom, Eva E.
    Hansson, Elisabeth
    Hagberg, Kerstin
    PROSTHETICS AND ORTHOTICS INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 37 (02) : 152 - 160
  • [4] The influence of prosthetic suspension on gait and cortical modulations is persons with a transfemoral amputation: socket-suspended versus bone-anchored prosthesis
    Kooiman, Vera
    van der Cruijsen, Joris
    Leijendekkers, Ruud
    Verdonschot, Nico
    Solis-Escalante, Teodoro
    Weerdesteyn, Vivian
    JOURNAL OF NEUROENGINEERING AND REHABILITATION, 2024, 21 (01)
  • [5] Percutaneous Osseointegrated Prostheses for Transfemoral Amputations
    Li, Yan
    Lindeque, Bennie
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2018, 41 (02) : 75 - 80
  • [6] Joint Biomechanics In Transfemoral Amputees With A Socket-based Versus Osseointegrated Prosthesis: A Pilot Study
    Desai, Gauri A.
    Pope, John R.
    Shim, Jae K.
    Miller, Ross H.
    MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS & EXERCISE, 2024, 56 (10) : 573 - 574
  • [7] Extended physiological proprioception is affected by transhumeral Socket-Suspended prosthesis use
    Dunn, Julia A.
    Wong, Bob
    Sinclair, Sarina K.
    Henninger, Heath B.
    Bachus, Kent N.
    Foreman, K. Bo
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2024, 166
  • [8] Lifetime cost-effectiveness analysis osseointegrated transfemoral versus socket prosthesis using Markov modelling
    Voigt, J. D.
    Potter, B. K.
    Souza, J.
    Forsberg, J.
    Melton, D.
    Hsu, J. R.
    Wilke, B.
    BONE & JOINT OPEN, 2024, 5 (03): : 218 - 226
  • [9] Reliable in vitro method for the evaluation of the primary stability and load transfer of transfemoral prostheses for osseointegrated implantation
    Galteri, Giulia
    Palanca, Marco
    Alesi, Domenico
    Zaffagnini, Stefano
    Morellato, Kavin
    Gruppioni, Emanuele
    Cristofolini, Luca
    FRONTIERS IN BIOENGINEERING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2024, 12
  • [10] Unilateral transfemoral osseointegrated prostheses improve joint loading during walking
    Vandenberg, Nicholas W.
    Stoneback, Jason W.
    Davis-Wilson, Hope
    Christiansen, Cory L.
    Awad, Mohamed E.
    Melton, Danielle H.
    Gaffney, Brecca M. M.
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2023, 155