Comparison of most probable number-PCR and most probable number-foci detection method for quantifying infectious Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts in environmental samples

被引:17
|
作者
Carey, Christine M. [1 ]
Lee, Hung [1 ]
Trevors, Jack T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guelph, Dept Environm Biol, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
关键词
Cryptosporidium parvum; foci detection method (FDM); most probable number (MPN); cell culture; PCR;
D O I
10.1016/j.mimet.2006.04.007
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Microbial contamination of public water supplies is of significant concern, as numerous outbreaks, including Cryptosporidium, have been reported worldwide. Detection and enumeration of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts in water supplies is important for the prevention of future cryptosporidiosis outbreaks. In addition to not identifying the oocyst species, the U.S. EPA Method 1622 does not provide information on oocyst viability or infectivity. As such, current detection strategies have been coupled with in vitro culture methods to assess oocyst infectivity. In this study, a most probable number (MPN) method was coupled with PCR (MPN-PCR) to quantify the number of infectious oocysts recovered from seeded raw water concentrates. The frequency of positive MPN-PCR results decreased as the oocyst numbers decreased. Similar results were observed when MPN was coupled to the foci detection method (MPN-FDM), which was done for comparison. For both methods, infectious oocysts were not detected below 103 seeded oocysts and the MPN-PCR and MPN-FDM estimates for each seed dose were generally within one-log unit of directly enumerated foci of infection. MPN-PCR estimates were 0.25, 0.54, 0 and 0.66 log(10) units higher than MPN-FDM estimates for the positive control, 10(5), 10(4) and 10(3) seed doses, respectively. The results show the MPN-PCR was the better method for the detection of infectious C. parvum oocysts in environmental water samples. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:363 / 372
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Quantitative and specific detection of a trichloroethylene-degrading methanotroph, Methylocystis sp strain M, by a most probable number-polymerase chain reaction method
    Kikuchi, T
    Iwasaki, K
    Nishihara, H
    Takamura, Y
    Yagi, O
    BIOSCIENCE BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY, 2001, 65 (12) : 2673 - 2681
  • [42] Most probable number method combined with nested polymerase chain reaction for detection and enumeration of enterotoxigenic Clostridium perfringens in intestinal contents of cattle, pig and chicken
    Miwa, N
    Nishina, T
    Kubo, S
    Atsumi, M
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICAL SCIENCE, 1997, 59 (02): : 89 - 92
  • [43] Thin agar layer- versus most probable number-PCR to enumerate viable and stressed Escherichia coli O157:H7 and application in a traditional raw milk pasta filata cheese
    Fusco, Vincenzina
    Riccardi, Maria
    Quero, Grazia Marina
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 2012, 159 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [44] Enumeration of total aerobic bacteria and Escherichia coli in minced meat and on carcass surface samples with an automated most-probable-number method compared with colony count protocols
    Paulsen, P.
    Schopf, E.
    Smulders, F. J. M.
    JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 2006, 69 (10) : 2500 - 2503
  • [45] Rapid Detection and Enumeration of Exoelectrogenic Bacteria in Lake Sediments and a Wastewater Treatment Plant Using a Coupled WO3 Nanoclusters and Most Probable Number Method
    Yang, Zong-Chuang
    Cheng, Yuan-Yuan
    Zhang, Feng
    Li, Bing -Bing
    Mu, Yang
    Li, Wen-Wei
    Yu, Han-Qing
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY LETTERS, 2016, 3 (04): : 133 - 137
  • [46] Comparison of the compact dry CF with the most probable number method (AOAC Official Method 966.24) for enumeration of coliform bacteria in raw meats -: Performance-tested methodSM 110401
    Kodaka, H
    Teramura, H
    Nirazuka, T
    Mizuochi, S
    JOURNAL OF AOAC INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 89 (01) : 115 - 126
  • [47] Rapid detection of coliforms in drinking water of Arak city using multiplex PCR method in comparison with the standard method of culture(Most probably Number)
    Dehghan fatemeh
    Zolfaghari Mohammad Reza
    Arjomandzadegan Mohammad
    Kalantari Salomeh
    Ahmari Gholam Reza
    Sarmadian Hossein
    Sadrnia Maryam
    Ahmadi Azam
    Shojapoor Mana
    Najarian Negin
    Kasravi Alii Reza
    Falahat Saeed
    Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine, 2014, (05) : 404 - 409
  • [48] Evaluation of Various Campylobacter-Specific Quantitative PCR (qPCR) Assays for Detection and Enumeration of Campylobacteraceae in Irrigation Water and Wastewater via a Miniaturized Most-Probable-Number-qPCR Assay
    Banting, Graham S.
    Braithwaite, Shannon
    Scott, Candis
    Kim, Jinyong
    Jeon, Byeonghwa
    Ashbolt, Nicholas
    Ruecker, Norma
    Tymensen, Lisa
    Charest, Jollin
    Pintar, Katarina
    Checkley, Sylvia
    Neumann, Norman F.
    APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2016, 82 (15) : 4743 - 4756
  • [49] Comparison of the Compact Dry EC with the most probable number method (AOAC official method 966.24) for enumeration of Escherichia coll and coliform bacteria in raw meats Performance-Tested MethodSM 110402
    Kodaka, Hidemasa
    Mizuochi, Sihngo
    Teramura, Hajime
    Nirazuka, Tadanobu
    Journal of AOAC International, 2006, 89 (01): : 100 - 114
  • [50] Comparison of the compact dry EC with the most probable number method (AOAC Official Method 966.24) for enumeration of Escherichia coli and coliform bacteria in raw meats -: Performance-tested methodsSM 110402
    Kodaka, H
    Mizuochi, S
    Teramura, H
    Nirazuka, T
    JOURNAL OF AOAC INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 89 (01) : 100 - 114