Comparison of most probable number-PCR and most probable number-foci detection method for quantifying infectious Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts in environmental samples

被引:17
|
作者
Carey, Christine M. [1 ]
Lee, Hung [1 ]
Trevors, Jack T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guelph, Dept Environm Biol, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
关键词
Cryptosporidium parvum; foci detection method (FDM); most probable number (MPN); cell culture; PCR;
D O I
10.1016/j.mimet.2006.04.007
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Microbial contamination of public water supplies is of significant concern, as numerous outbreaks, including Cryptosporidium, have been reported worldwide. Detection and enumeration of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts in water supplies is important for the prevention of future cryptosporidiosis outbreaks. In addition to not identifying the oocyst species, the U.S. EPA Method 1622 does not provide information on oocyst viability or infectivity. As such, current detection strategies have been coupled with in vitro culture methods to assess oocyst infectivity. In this study, a most probable number (MPN) method was coupled with PCR (MPN-PCR) to quantify the number of infectious oocysts recovered from seeded raw water concentrates. The frequency of positive MPN-PCR results decreased as the oocyst numbers decreased. Similar results were observed when MPN was coupled to the foci detection method (MPN-FDM), which was done for comparison. For both methods, infectious oocysts were not detected below 103 seeded oocysts and the MPN-PCR and MPN-FDM estimates for each seed dose were generally within one-log unit of directly enumerated foci of infection. MPN-PCR estimates were 0.25, 0.54, 0 and 0.66 log(10) units higher than MPN-FDM estimates for the positive control, 10(5), 10(4) and 10(3) seed doses, respectively. The results show the MPN-PCR was the better method for the detection of infectious C. parvum oocysts in environmental water samples. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:363 / 372
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluation of a New Most-Probable-Number (MPN) Dilution Plate Method for the Enumeration of Escherichia coli in Water Samples
    Kodaka, Hidemasa
    Saito, Mikako
    Matsuoka, Hideaki
    BIOCONTROL SCIENCE, 2009, 14 (03) : 123 - 126
  • [32] USE OF THE C-14 MOST-PROBABLE-NUMBER METHOD TO ENUMERATE ACTIVE HETEROTROPHIC BACTERIA IN AQUEOUS SAMPLES
    KUENEMANN, P
    BATTERSBY, NS
    CHEMOSPHERE, 1992, 25 (04) : 591 - 603
  • [33] Application of miniaturized most probable number method for bacterial detection in water samples: detection of multi-drug-resistant Ralstonia insidiosa in drinking water
    Ilsan, Noor Andryan
    Nurfajriah, Siti
    Inggraini, Maulin
    Krishanti, Ni Putu Ratna Ayu
    Yunita, Melda
    Sipriyadi, Reza
    Anindita, Reza
    Huang, Tzu-Wen
    JOURNAL OF WATER AND HEALTH, 2024, 22 (09) : 1618 - 1627
  • [34] Detection and Quantification of Campylobacter in Poultry Slaughterhouses Using Conventional Microbiological Technique, Most Probable Number, and Real-Time PCR
    Perdoncini, Gustavo
    Sierra Arguello, Yuli Melisa
    Moreira Lima, Leonardo
    Quedi Furian, Thales
    Apellanis Borges, Karen
    Beatriz Rodrigues, Laura
    Ruschel dos Santos, Luciana
    Borsoi, Anderlise
    Werlang Isolan, Leonardo
    Gomes, Marcos Jose Pereira
    Pippi Salle, Carlos Tadeu
    de Souza Moraes, Hamilton Luiz
    Pinheiro do Nascimento, Vladimir
    FOODBORNE PATHOGENS AND DISEASE, 2022, 19 (02) : 143 - 150
  • [35] Evaluation of Most-Probable-Number-PCR Method with Internal Amplification Control for the Counting of Total and Pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Frozen Shrimps
    Copin, S.
    Robert-Pillot, A.
    Malle, P.
    Quilici, M. L.
    Gay, M.
    JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 2012, 75 (01) : 150 - 153
  • [36] COMPARISON BETWEEN DIRECT COUNTS OF ACTIVE SOIL CILIATES (PROTOZOA) AND MOST PROBABLE NUMBER ESTIMATES OBTAINED BY SINGH DILUTION CULTURE METHOD
    BERTHOLD, A
    PALZENBERGER, M
    BIOLOGY AND FERTILITY OF SOILS, 1995, 19 (04) : 348 - 356
  • [37] Real-time PCR detection of 16S rRNA genes speeds most-probable-number enumeration of foodborne Listeria monocytogenes
    Pereira De Martinis, Elaine Cristina
    Duvall, Robert E.
    Hitchins, Anthony D.
    JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 2007, 70 (07) : 1650 - 1655
  • [38] Comparison of the quantitative dry culture methods with both conventional media and most probable number method for the enumeration of coliforms and Escherichia coli/coliforms in food
    Teramura, H.
    Sota, K.
    Iwasaki, M.
    Ogihara, H.
    LETTERS IN APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2017, 65 (01) : 57 - 65
  • [39] A comparison of Listeria monocytogenes growth monitoring in ground pork samples by real-time polymerase chain reaction to conventional agar and most probable number methods
    Noviyanti, Fia
    Hosotani, Yukie
    Inatsu, Yasuhiro
    Kawasaki, Susumu
    FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH, 2021, 27 (04) : 647 - 656
  • [40] Quantification of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in milk by most probable number -polymerase chain reaction (MPN-PCR) method
    Jamshidi, A.
    Mohammadi, S.
    Mohammadi, A.
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY RESEARCH, 2011, 5 (26): : 4588 - 4591