The cost utility of solifenacin in the treatment of overactive bladder

被引:8
|
作者
Hakkaart, Leona [1 ]
Verboom, Paul [1 ]
Phillips, Richard [2 ]
Al, Maiwenn J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Inst Med Technol Assessment, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Goffin Consultancy Ltd, Stelling Minnis, Canterbury, Kent, England
关键词
Urinary incontinence; Muscarinic receptor antagonist; Overactive bladder; Cost-utility analysis; Markov-model; INCONTINENCE; SYMPTOMS;
D O I
10.1007/s11255-008-9448-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Overactive bladder may cause significant discomfort to patients. The standard therapy for overactive bladder includes behavioural therapy and sometimes medication. Recently, a new medication (solifenacin 5 and 10 mg) was developed for treatment of overactive bladder. The objective of this study was to assess the cost utility of solifenacin 5 and 10 mg for overactive bladder. We developed a Markov model to estimate the cost per quality adjusted life years (QALY) over a period of 12-months. Model parameters were based on randomized clinical trials for solifenacin 5 and 10 mg. Data on utility scores were taken from the literature. The incremental cost per QALY for solifenacin 5 mg and solifenacin 10 mg compared with placebo were A 17,602 pound and A 24,464 pound respectively. Sensitivity analyses showed that these results were robust to changes of relevant input data. Solifenacin 5 and 10 mg are cost-effective treatments in patients with overactive bladder.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 298
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Solifenacin in overactive bladder - A viewpoint by Hashim Hashim
    Hashim, H
    DRUGS & AGING, 2005, 22 (12) : 1070 - 1070
  • [42] COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF SOLIFENACIN SUCCINATE VERSUS TROSPIUM CHLORIDE IN THE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH OVERACTIVE BLADDER IN GERMANY
    Hart, W. M.
    Nazir, J.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2012, 15 (04) : A156 - A156
  • [43] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF SOLIFENACIN FOR THE TREATMENT OF OVERACTIVE BLADDER FROM A US PRIVATE PAYER AND MEDICARE ADVANTAGE PERSPECTIVE
    Ng, D. B.
    Wielage, R.
    Klein, T. M.
    Klein, R. W.
    Gooch, K.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (07) : A519 - A519
  • [44] Mirabegron as Add-On Treatment to Solifenacin in Patients with Incontinent Overactive Bladder and an Inadequate Response to Solifenacin Monotherapy
    MacDiarmid, Scott
    Al-Shukri, Salman
    Barkin, Jack
    Fianu-Jonasson, Aino
    Grise, Philippe
    Herschorn, Sender
    Saleem, Tahir
    Huang, Moses
    Siddiqui, Emad
    Stolzel, Matthias
    Hemsted, Claire
    Nazir, Jameel
    Hakimi, Zalmai
    Drake, Marcus J.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 196 (03): : 809 - 818
  • [45] CLINICAL EFFICACY OF SOLIFENACIN ON FEMALE SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION IN PATIENTS WITH OVERACTIVE BLADDER (SOS TRIAL; SOLIFENACIN ON OVERACTIVE BLADDER AND SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION)
    Oh, Cheol Young
    Kim, Tae Hyo
    Hwang, Ji Won
    Bang, Woo Jin
    Yoo, Changhee
    Lee, Young Goo
    Cho, Jin Seon
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (04): : E618 - E619
  • [46] COST UTILITY ANALYSIS OF SACRAL NEUROMODULATION VERSUS BOTOX A IN THE TREATMENT OF OVERACTIVE BLADDER IN COLOMBIA
    Castano, J. C.
    Lopera, A.
    Orozco, J. J.
    Valencia, J. E.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (03) : A294 - A294
  • [47] COST-UTILITY ANALYSIS OF MIRABEGRON VERSUS ANTIMUSCARINIC THERAPY IN THE TREATMENT OF OVERACTIVE BLADDER
    Majd, Karimi Z.
    Taheri, S.
    Yousefi, N.
    Peiravian, F.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2019, 22 : S915 - S916
  • [49] Combined treatment of solifenacin and mirabegron, an alternative in patients with overactive bladder (BESIDE study)
    Alcantara-Montero, A.
    ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2016, 40 (09): : 593 - 594
  • [50] FACTORS AFFECTING PERSISTENCE WITH THERAPY OF SOLIFENACIN TREATMENT IN PATIENTS WITH OVERACTIVE BLADDER SYNDROME
    Hoon, A.
    Jeong, G.
    Jae, H.
    MiMi, H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 19 : 178 - 178