The cost utility of solifenacin in the treatment of overactive bladder

被引:8
|
作者
Hakkaart, Leona [1 ]
Verboom, Paul [1 ]
Phillips, Richard [2 ]
Al, Maiwenn J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Inst Med Technol Assessment, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Goffin Consultancy Ltd, Stelling Minnis, Canterbury, Kent, England
关键词
Urinary incontinence; Muscarinic receptor antagonist; Overactive bladder; Cost-utility analysis; Markov-model; INCONTINENCE; SYMPTOMS;
D O I
10.1007/s11255-008-9448-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Overactive bladder may cause significant discomfort to patients. The standard therapy for overactive bladder includes behavioural therapy and sometimes medication. Recently, a new medication (solifenacin 5 and 10 mg) was developed for treatment of overactive bladder. The objective of this study was to assess the cost utility of solifenacin 5 and 10 mg for overactive bladder. We developed a Markov model to estimate the cost per quality adjusted life years (QALY) over a period of 12-months. Model parameters were based on randomized clinical trials for solifenacin 5 and 10 mg. Data on utility scores were taken from the literature. The incremental cost per QALY for solifenacin 5 mg and solifenacin 10 mg compared with placebo were A 17,602 pound and A 24,464 pound respectively. Sensitivity analyses showed that these results were robust to changes of relevant input data. Solifenacin 5 and 10 mg are cost-effective treatments in patients with overactive bladder.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 298
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A COST-UTILITY ANALYSIS OF SOLIFENACIN 5 MG AND SOLIFENACIN 10 MG VERSUS TOLTERODINE ER 4 MG IN THE PHARMACOLOGICAL TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH OVERACTIVE BLADDER (OAB)
    Cardozo, L.
    Thorpe, A.
    Grishchenko, M.
    Sidhu, M. K.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2008, 11 (06) : A653 - A653
  • [22] A cost effectiveness analysis of solifenacin compared with extended-release tolterodine for the treatment of overactive bladder
    Kang, H. H.
    Bae, J. Y.
    Park, S. Y.
    Sohn, H. S.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2007, 10 (06) : A319 - A319
  • [23] PREDICTOR FACTORS FOR SUCCESSFUL TREATMENT OF SOLIFENACIN IN PATIENTS WITH OVERACTIVE BLADDER
    Wang, Chung-Cheng
    Ong, Hueih-Ling
    Kuo, Hann-Chorng
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04): : E870 - E870
  • [24] Solifenacin and Tolterodine are Equally Effective in the Treatment of Overactive Bladder Symptoms
    Ho, Chen-Hsun
    Chang, Ting-Chen
    Lin, Ho-Hsiung
    Liu, Shih-Ping
    Huang, Kuo-How
    Yu, Hong-Jeng
    JOURNAL OF THE FORMOSAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 109 (10) : 702 - 708
  • [25] ASSOCIATED FACTORS OF DOSE ESCALATION FOR THE TREATMENT OF OVERACTIVE BLADDER WITH SOLIFENACIN
    Chun, Jiyoun
    Song, Miho
    Han, Ji-Yeon
    Lee, Kyu-Sung
    Choo, Myung-Soo
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2013, 32 (02) : 167 - 167
  • [26] Analysis of overactive bladder symptoms after ceasing solifenacin treatment
    Wlazlak, Edyta
    Suzin, Jacek
    Dunicz-Sokolowska, Aldona
    Bugaj, Andrzej Marcin
    Surkont, Grzegorz
    MENOPAUSE REVIEW-PRZEGLAD MENOPAUZALNY, 2013, 12 (03): : 278 - 282
  • [27] Is solifenacin succinate a safe and effective treatment for overactive bladder syndrome?
    Roger Dmochowski
    Nature Clinical Practice Urology, 2005, 2 : 82 - 83
  • [28] Is solifenacin succinate a safe and effective treatment for overactive bladder syndrome?
    Dmochowski, R
    NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE UROLOGY, 2005, 2 (02): : 82 - 83
  • [29] PHARMACOECONOMIC EVALUATION OF SOLIFENACIN IN THE TREATMENT OF OVERACTIVE BLADDER SYNDROME IN ITALY
    Pradelli, L.
    Iannazzo, S.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2008, 11 (06) : A650 - A651
  • [30] Solifenacin for Therapy Resistant Overactive Bladder
    Hoebeke, Piet
    De Pooter, Jan
    De Caestecker, Karel
    Raes, Ann
    Dehoorne, Joke
    Van Laecke, Erik
    Walle, Johan Vande
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 182 (04): : 2040 - 2044