M1a prostate cancer: Results of a Dutch multidisciplinary consensus meeting

被引:6
|
作者
Aluwini, Shafak [1 ]
Oprea-Lager, Daniela E. [2 ]
de Barros, Hilda [3 ]
Mehra, Niven [4 ]
Stoevelaar, Herman [5 ]
Yakar, Derya [6 ]
van Der Poel, Henk [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Radiat Oncol, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Univ Med Ctr, Dept Radiol & Nucl Med, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Dept Urol, Plesmanlaan 121, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Radboudumc, Dept Med Oncol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[5] Ismar Healthcare NV, Ctr Decis Anal & Support, Lier, Belgium
[6] Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Radiol, Groningen, Netherlands
来源
BJUI COMPASS | 2021年 / 2卷 / 03期
关键词
extra-pelvic lymph node; metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer; nodal metastasis; non-regional lymph node; PSMA-PET/CT; recurrent prostate cancer; METASTASIS-DIRECTED THERAPY; LYMPH-NODE; RECURRENCE; SITE;
D O I
10.1002/bco2.73
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ObjectivesTo determine the consensus of a Dutch multidisciplinary expert panel on the diagnostic evaluation and treatment of de novo and recurrent metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) limited to non-regional lymph nodes (M1a) in daily clinical practice.Materials and methodsThe panel consisted of 37 Dutch specialists from disciplines involved in the management of M1a PCa (urology, medical and radiation oncology, radiology, and nuclear medicine). We used a modified Delphi method consisting of two voting rounds and a consensus meeting (video conference). Consensus (good agreement) was defined as the situation in which >= 75% of the panelists chose the same option.ResultsConsensus existed for 57% of the items. The panel agreed that prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA-PET/CT) is the most appropriate standard imaging modality to identify de novo (100%) and recurrent (97%) M1a PCa. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) combined with radiotherapy to the prostate +/- the M1a lesion(s) was most frequently considered an option for de novo M1a PCa. For M1a as recurrent disease, ADT alone, deferring treatment, or local radiotherapy to the M1a lesion(s) were judged to be the most important treatment options. However, no specific indications for treatment choice in relation to disease characteristics could be formulated.ConclusionsThe Dutch consensus panel preferred PSMA-PET/CT as the standard diagnostic modality to detect M1a PCa. Although potential treatment options were identified, explicit recommendations could not be formulated. This might (partly) be explained by the absence of high-level clinical evidence in this subset of patients. Further research is, therefore, strongly encouraged.
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 168
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Results of the first thousand patients from a multidisciplinary prostate cancer clinic.
    Rudd, Pandora
    Hines, John
    Cathcart, Paul
    Wilkinson, Karen
    Shaw, Greg
    Wilson, Peter
    Shamash, Jonathan
    Richards, Thomas Murray
    Wells, Paula
    Kelly, John D.
    Chan, Pui Ying
    Green, James
    Powles, Thomas
    Tipples, Karen
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (15)
  • [42] Epitranscriptomics and cervical cancer: the emerging role of m6A, m5C and m1A RNA modifications
    Modi, Akshat D.
    Zahid, Hira
    Southerland, Ashlyn Chase
    Modi, Dharmeshkumar M.
    EXPERT REVIEWS IN MOLECULAR MEDICINE, 2024, 26
  • [43] Diagnosis and management of hepatocellular carcinoma: results of a consensus meeting of The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre
    Asmis, T.
    Balaa, F.
    Scully, L.
    Papadatos, D.
    Marginean, C.
    Fasih, N.
    Shaw-Stiffel, T.
    Goel, R.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2010, 17 (02) : 6 - 12
  • [44] m1A RNA methylation-related gene expression and prognostic features in breast cancer
    Wang, Zihan
    Hu, Songli
    Wang, Yifan
    Liu, Tiecheng
    MINERVA SURGERY, 2024,
  • [45] Clinician's Guide to Epitranscriptomics: An Example of N1-Methyladenosine (m1A) RNA Modification and Cancer
    Pavic, Ana Kvolik
    Conkas, Josipa
    Mumlek, Ivan
    Zubcic, Vedran
    Ozretic, Petar
    LIFE-BASEL, 2024, 14 (10):
  • [46] Report on the Dutch consensus development meeting for implementation and further development of population screening for colorectal cancer based on FOBT
    de Visser, M
    van Ballegooijen, M
    Bloemers, SM
    van Deventer, S
    Jansen, JBMJ
    Jespersen, J
    Kluft, C
    Meijer, GA
    Stoker, J
    de Valk, GA
    Verweij, MF
    Vlems, FA
    CELLULAR ONCOLOGY, 2005, 27 (01) : 17 - 29
  • [47] Resolution on the results of the Meeting of Experts on the treatment of castrate-resistant prostate cancer
    Alekseev, B. Y.
    Matveev, V. B.
    Rusakov, I. G.
    Volkova, M., I
    Karjakin, O. B.
    Bolotina, L., V
    Kolesnikov, G. P.
    Kopylcov, E., I
    Kamolov, B. S.
    Nyushkov, K. M.
    Atduev, V. A.
    Karnauch, P. A.
    Smirnov, R., V
    Tonacheva, O. G.
    Tevs, D., V
    Izmailov, A. A.
    Govorov, A., V
    Gafanov, R. A.
    Mishugin, S., V
    Karyakin, A. O.
    ONKOUROLOGIYA, 2016, 12 (03): : 109 - 110
  • [48] PERFORMANCE AND COST OF THE RENAL CANCER SPECIALIST MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAM MEETING: RESULTS FROM 1500 DISCUSSIONS
    Neves, Joana B.
    Shepherd, Scott
    Cullen, David
    Powles, Thomas
    Aitchison, Michael
    Tran, Maxine G. B.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (04): : E1093 - E1093
  • [49] Performance and cost of a renal cancer specialist multidisciplinary team meeting: Results from 1500 discussions
    Neves, Joana B.
    Shepherd, Scott
    Cullen, David
    Powles, Tom
    Aitchison, Michael
    Tran, Maxine G. B.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2019, 12 (04) : 314 - 319
  • [50] Can an international consensus meeting change the future of advanced breast cancer patients? Highlights from ABC1 Consensus Meeting
    Cardoso, Fatima
    Winer, Eric
    Norton, Larry
    Gomis, Roger
    Krop, Ian
    Harbeck, Nadia
    Costa, Alberto
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 48 : S13 - S14