M1a prostate cancer: Results of a Dutch multidisciplinary consensus meeting

被引:6
|
作者
Aluwini, Shafak [1 ]
Oprea-Lager, Daniela E. [2 ]
de Barros, Hilda [3 ]
Mehra, Niven [4 ]
Stoevelaar, Herman [5 ]
Yakar, Derya [6 ]
van Der Poel, Henk [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Radiat Oncol, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Univ Med Ctr, Dept Radiol & Nucl Med, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Dept Urol, Plesmanlaan 121, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Radboudumc, Dept Med Oncol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[5] Ismar Healthcare NV, Ctr Decis Anal & Support, Lier, Belgium
[6] Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Radiol, Groningen, Netherlands
来源
BJUI COMPASS | 2021年 / 2卷 / 03期
关键词
extra-pelvic lymph node; metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer; nodal metastasis; non-regional lymph node; PSMA-PET/CT; recurrent prostate cancer; METASTASIS-DIRECTED THERAPY; LYMPH-NODE; RECURRENCE; SITE;
D O I
10.1002/bco2.73
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ObjectivesTo determine the consensus of a Dutch multidisciplinary expert panel on the diagnostic evaluation and treatment of de novo and recurrent metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) limited to non-regional lymph nodes (M1a) in daily clinical practice.Materials and methodsThe panel consisted of 37 Dutch specialists from disciplines involved in the management of M1a PCa (urology, medical and radiation oncology, radiology, and nuclear medicine). We used a modified Delphi method consisting of two voting rounds and a consensus meeting (video conference). Consensus (good agreement) was defined as the situation in which >= 75% of the panelists chose the same option.ResultsConsensus existed for 57% of the items. The panel agreed that prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA-PET/CT) is the most appropriate standard imaging modality to identify de novo (100%) and recurrent (97%) M1a PCa. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) combined with radiotherapy to the prostate +/- the M1a lesion(s) was most frequently considered an option for de novo M1a PCa. For M1a as recurrent disease, ADT alone, deferring treatment, or local radiotherapy to the M1a lesion(s) were judged to be the most important treatment options. However, no specific indications for treatment choice in relation to disease characteristics could be formulated.ConclusionsThe Dutch consensus panel preferred PSMA-PET/CT as the standard diagnostic modality to detect M1a PCa. Although potential treatment options were identified, explicit recommendations could not be formulated. This might (partly) be explained by the absence of high-level clinical evidence in this subset of patients. Further research is, therefore, strongly encouraged.
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 168
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Report of a consensus meeting on focal low dose rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer
    Langley, Stephen
    Ahmed, Hashim U.
    Al-Qaisieh, Bashar
    Bostwick, David
    Dickinson, Louise
    Gomez Veiga, Francisco
    Grimm, Peter
    Machtens, Stefan
    Guedea, Ferran
    Emberton, Mark
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 109 : 7 - 16
  • [22] Current state of the art, multimodality research and future visions for the treatment of patients with prostate cancer: consensus results from "Challenges and Chances in Prostate Cancer Research Meeting 2013"
    Combs, Stephanie E.
    Debus, Juergen
    Feick, Guenter
    Hadaschik, Boris
    Hohenfellner, Markus
    Schuele, Roland
    Zacharias, Jens-Peter
    Schwardt, Malte
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2014, 9 : 224
  • [23] Current state of the art, multimodality research and future visions for the treatment of patients with prostate cancer: consensus results from "Challenges and Chances in Prostate Cancer Research Meeting 2013"
    Stephanie E Combs
    Jürgen Debus
    Günter Feick
    Boris Hadaschik
    Markus Hohenfellner
    Roland Schüle
    Jens-Peter Zacharias
    Malte Schwardt
    Radiation Oncology, 9
  • [24] RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY VERSUS RADIOTHERAPY IN M1A AND LOW VOLUME M1B PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS: AN INDIRECT COMPARISON WITH THE STAMPEDE TRIAL ARM H
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Heidenreich, Axel
    Pfister, David
    Shariat, Shahrokh
    Grubmuller, Bernhard
    Motterle, Giovanni
    Devos, Gaetan
    Robesti, Daniele
    Scalvi, Filippo
    Fallara, Giuseppe
    Pellegrino, Antony
    Berghen, Charlien
    Everaerts, Wouter
    Fossati, Nicola
    Scuderi, Simone
    Martini, Alberto
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Joniau, Steve
    Karnes, Jeffrey
    Briganti, Alberto
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E364 - E364
  • [25] Improving prostate cancer care collaboratively - a multidisciplinary, formal, consensus-based approach
    Loblaw, Andrew
    Barkin, Jack
    Buckley, Roger
    Chung, Hans
    Kell, John
    Singal, Rajiv
    Spodek, Jeff
    Vesprini, Danny
    Flax, Stanley
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 24 (01) : 8646 - 8650
  • [26] Non-small cell lung cancer: Are M1a and M1b the same stage?
    Dias, Margarida
    Coutinho, Daniel
    Linhas, Rita
    Campainha, Sergio
    Conde, Sara
    Antunes, Ana
    Barroso, Ana
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2015, 46
  • [27] Identification of Key Elements in Prostate Cancer for Ontology Building via a Multidisciplinary Consensus Agreement
    Moreno, Amy
    Solanki, Abhishek A.
    Xu, Tianlin
    Lin, Ruitao
    Palta, Jatinder
    Daugherty, Emily
    Hong, David
    Hong, Julian
    Kamran, Sophia C.
    Katsoulakis, Evangelia
    Brock, Kristy
    Feng, Mary
    Fuller, Clifton
    Mayo, Charles
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (12)
  • [28] Radiotherapy in localised prostate cancer: does the multidisciplinary meeting influence referral to radiation oncology?
    Tran, V.
    Li, M.
    Thomson, A.
    Alberto, M.
    Dat, A.
    Sengupta, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 26 : 181 - 181
  • [29] Impact of a uro-oncology multidisciplinary meeting on clinical decision making in prostate cancer
    Rao, Kenny
    Manya, Kiran
    Azad, Arun
    Bolton, Damien
    Davis, Ian
    Sengupta, Shomik
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 112 : 19 - 19
  • [30] The Charlson comorbidity score: a superior comorbidity assessment tool for the prostate cancer multidisciplinary meeting
    Kastner, C.
    Armitage, J.
    Kimble, A.
    Rawal, J.
    Carter, P. G.
    Venn, S.
    PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2006, 9 (03) : 270 - 274