Quantum learning and universal quantum matching machine

被引:70
|
作者
Sasaki, M [1 ]
Carlini, A
机构
[1] Commun Res Labs, Tokyo 1848795, Japan
[2] Japan Sci & Technol Agcy, CREST, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Japan Sci & Technol Agcy, ERATO, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Imai Quantum Comp & Informat Project, Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo 1130033, Japan
来源
PHYSICAL REVIEW A | 2002年 / 66卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevA.66.022303
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Suppose that three kinds of quantum systems are given in some unknown states \f>(circle timesN), \g(1)>(circle timesK), and \g(2)>(circle timesK), and we want to decide which template state \g(1)> or \g(2)>, each representing the feature of the pattern class C-1 or C-2, respectively, is closest to the input feature state \f>. This is an extension of the pattern matching problem into the quantum domain. Assuming that these states are known a priori to belong to a certain parametric family of pure qubit systems, we derive two kinds of matching strategies. The first one is a semiclassical strategy that is obtained by the natural extension of conventional matching strategies and consists of a two-stage procedure: identification (estimation) of the unknown template states to design the classifier (learning process to train the classifier) and classification of the input system into the appropriate pattern class based on the estimated results. The other is a fully quantum strategy without any intermediate measurement, which we might call as the universal quantum matching machine. We present the Bayes optimal solutions for both strategies in the case of K=1, showing that there certainly exists a fully quantum matching procedure that is strictly superior to the straightforward semiclassical extension of the conventional matching strategy based on the learning process.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Quantum state tomography using quantum machine learning
    Innan, Nouhaila
    Siddiqui, Owais Ishtiaq
    Arora, Shivang
    Ghosh, Tamojit
    Kocak, Yasemin Poyraz
    Paragas, Dominic
    Galib, Abdullah Al Omar
    Khan, Muhammad Al-Zafar
    Bennai, Mohamed
    [J]. QUANTUM MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2024, 6 (01)
  • [32] Generalization in Quantum Machine Learning: A Quantum Information Standpoint
    Banchi, Leonardo
    Pereira, Jason
    Pirandola, Stefano
    [J]. PRX QUANTUM, 2021, 2 (04):
  • [33] Enhanced Quantum Synchronization via Quantum Machine Learning
    Cardenas-Lopez, Francisco A.
    Sanz, Mikel
    Retamal, Juan Carlos
    Solano, Enrique
    [J]. ADVANCED QUANTUM TECHNOLOGIES, 2019, 2 (7-8)
  • [34] Blind Quantum Machine Learning with Quantum Bipartite Correlator
    Li, Changhao
    Li, Boning
    Amer, Omar
    Shaydulin, Ruslan
    Chakrabarti, Shouvanik
    Wang, Guoqing
    Xu, Haowei
    Tang, Hao
    Schoch, Isidor
    Kumar, Niraj
    Lim, Charles
    Li, Ju
    Cappellaro, Paola
    Pistoia, Marco
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2024, 133 (12)
  • [35] Quantum neural network: Prospects for quantum machine learning
    Matsui, Nobuyuki
    [J]. Journal of Japan Institute of Electronics Packaging, 2020, 23 (02) : 139 - 144
  • [36] Is Quantum Advantage the Right Goal for Quantum Machine Learning?
    Schuld, Maria
    Killoran, Nathan
    [J]. PRX QUANTUM, 2022, 3 (03):
  • [37] Benefits of Open Quantum Systems for Quantum Machine Learning
    Olivera-Atencio, Maria Laura
    Lamata, Lucas
    Casado-Pascual, Jesus
    [J]. ADVANCED QUANTUM TECHNOLOGIES, 2023,
  • [38] HASM quantum machine learning
    Yue, Tianxiang
    Wu, Chenchen
    Liu, Yi
    Du, Zhengping
    Zhao, Na
    Jiao, Yimeng
    Xu, Zhe
    Shi, Wenjiao
    [J]. SCIENCE CHINA-EARTH SCIENCES, 2023, 66 (09) : 1937 - 1945
  • [39] Quantum Machine Learning with SQUID
    Roggero, Alessandro
    Filipek, Jakub
    Hsu, Shih-Chieh
    Wiebe, Nathan
    [J]. QUANTUM, 2022, 6
  • [40] Federated Quantum Machine Learning
    Chen, Samuel Yen-Chi
    Yoo, Shinjae
    [J]. ENTROPY, 2021, 23 (04)