Quantum learning and universal quantum matching machine

被引:70
|
作者
Sasaki, M [1 ]
Carlini, A
机构
[1] Commun Res Labs, Tokyo 1848795, Japan
[2] Japan Sci & Technol Agcy, CREST, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Japan Sci & Technol Agcy, ERATO, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Imai Quantum Comp & Informat Project, Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo 1130033, Japan
来源
PHYSICAL REVIEW A | 2002年 / 66卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevA.66.022303
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Suppose that three kinds of quantum systems are given in some unknown states \f>(circle timesN), \g(1)>(circle timesK), and \g(2)>(circle timesK), and we want to decide which template state \g(1)> or \g(2)>, each representing the feature of the pattern class C-1 or C-2, respectively, is closest to the input feature state \f>. This is an extension of the pattern matching problem into the quantum domain. Assuming that these states are known a priori to belong to a certain parametric family of pure qubit systems, we derive two kinds of matching strategies. The first one is a semiclassical strategy that is obtained by the natural extension of conventional matching strategies and consists of a two-stage procedure: identification (estimation) of the unknown template states to design the classifier (learning process to train the classifier) and classification of the input system into the appropriate pattern class based on the estimated results. The other is a fully quantum strategy without any intermediate measurement, which we might call as the universal quantum matching machine. We present the Bayes optimal solutions for both strategies in the case of K=1, showing that there certainly exists a fully quantum matching procedure that is strictly superior to the straightforward semiclassical extension of the conventional matching strategy based on the learning process.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Quantum Machine Learning and Bioinspired Quantum Technologies
    Lamata, Lucas
    Sanz, Mikel
    Solano, Enrique
    [J]. ADVANCED QUANTUM TECHNOLOGIES, 2019, 2 (7-8)
  • [22] Quantum machine learning for quantum anomaly detection
    Liu, Nana
    Rebentrost, Patrick
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2018, 97 (04)
  • [23] Discriminating Quantum States with Quantum Machine Learning
    Quiroga, David
    Date, Prasanna
    Pooser, Raphael
    [J]. 2021 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON REBOOTING COMPUTING (ICRC 2021), 2021, : 56 - 63
  • [24] Quantum Embedding Search for Quantum Machine Learning
    Nguyen, Nam
    Chen, Kwang-Cheng
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2022, 10 : 41444 - 41456
  • [25] Discriminating Quantum States with Quantum Machine Learning
    Quiroga, David
    Date, Prasanna
    Pooser, Raphael
    [J]. 2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON QUANTUM COMPUTING AND ENGINEERING (QCE 2021) / QUANTUM WEEK 2021, 2021, : 481 - 482
  • [26] Quantum Machine Learning with Quantum Image Representations
    Tuyen Nguyen
    Paik, Incheon
    Sagawa, Hiroyuki
    Truong Cong Thang
    [J]. 2022 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON QUANTUM COMPUTING AND ENGINEERING (QCE 2022), 2022, : 851 - 854
  • [27] Nonexistence of a universal quantum machine to examine the precision of unknown quantum states
    Pang, Shengshi
    Wu, Shengjun
    Chen, Zeng-Bing
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2011, 84 (06)
  • [28] Universal algorithms for quantum data learning
    Fanizza, Marco
    Skotiniotis, Michalis
    Calsamiglia, John
    Munoz-Tapia, Ramon
    Sentis, Gael
    [J]. EPL, 2022, 140 (02)
  • [29] Unified universal quantum cloning machine and fidelities
    Wang, Yi-Nan
    Shi, Han-Duo
    Xiong, Zhao-Xi
    Jing, Li
    Ren, Xi-Jun
    Mu, Liang-Zhu
    Fan, Heng
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2011, 84 (03):
  • [30] Quantum geometric machine learning for quantum circuits and control
    Perrier, Elija
    Tao, Dacheng
    Ferrie, Chris
    [J]. NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2020, 22 (10):