Taxes, budgetary rule and majority voting

被引:7
|
作者
Cremer, H
De Donder, P
Gahvari, F
机构
[1] Univ Toulouse, IDEI, F-31000 Toulouse, France
[2] GREMAQ, F-31000 Toulouse, France
[3] Univ Illinois, Dept Econ, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1023/B:PUCH.0000033324.71658.f3
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper studies majority voting outcomes for a specific class of two-dimensional policies. One policy instrument influences efficiency and the other redistribution. Absent the political process, the two dimensions can be addressed separately. With a two dimensional vote, the two aspects will interact in a non-trivial way. The illustrative policy we consider, requires taxing an externality-generating good and determining a budgetary rule which specifies the proportions of the tax proceeds that go to wage earners and to capital owners. We show: First, a sequential vote wherein the tax rate is determined first and the budgetary rule second, always possesses an equilibrium and that this equilibrium is the median-endowed individual's most-preferred policy. Second, the reverse sequential choice implies that the median-endowed individual may, but need not, be decisive. Third, the "Shepsle procedure" also implies that the equilibrium is the policy most favored by the median individual. Fourth, this equilibrium constitutes, under certain circumstances, the Condorcet winner for the unrestricted simultaneous voting game.
引用
收藏
页码:335 / 358
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] PREDICTING COMMITTEE BEHAVIOR IN MAJORITY-RULE VOTING EXPERIMENTS
    SALANT, SW
    GOODSTEIN, E
    RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1990, 21 (02): : 293 - 313
  • [22] MAJORITY VOTING AND CORPORATE-CONTROL - THE RULE OF THE DOMINANT SHAREHOLDER
    DEMARZO, PM
    REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1993, 60 (03): : 713 - 734
  • [23] RECOGNIZING MAJORITY-RULE EQUILIBRIUM IN SPATIAL VOTING GAMES
    BARTHOLDI, JJ
    NARASIMHAN, LS
    TOVEY, CA
    SOCIAL CHOICE AND WELFARE, 1991, 8 (03) : 183 - 197
  • [24] Optimistic Selection Rule Better Than Majority Voting System
    Sugiyama, Takuya
    Obata, Takuya
    Hoki, Kunihito
    Ito, Takeshi
    COMPUTERS AND GAMES, 2011, 6515 : 166 - +
  • [25] BORDAS RULE, POSITIONAL VOTING, AND CONDORCETS SIMPLE MAJORITY PRINCIPLE
    FISHBURN, PC
    GEHRLEIN, WV
    PUBLIC CHOICE, 1976, 28 (WIN) : 79 - 88
  • [26] Majority Rule versus Supermajority Rules: Their Effects on Narrow and Broad Taxes
    Heckelman, Jac C.
    Dougherty, Keith L.
    PUBLIC FINANCE REVIEW, 2010, 38 (06) : 738 - 761
  • [27] A Combination Scheme for Fuzzy Partitions Based on Fuzzy Majority Voting Rule
    Li, Chunsheng
    NSWCTC 2009: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NETWORKS SECURITY, WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS AND TRUSTED COMPUTING, VOL 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 675 - 678
  • [28] Real space renormalization group and totalitarian paradox of majority rule voting
    Galam, S
    PHYSICA A, 2000, 285 (1-2): : 66 - 76
  • [29] Voting methods, problems of majority rule, and demand-revealing procedures
    Munger, Michael C.
    PUBLIC CHOICE, 2012, 152 (1-2) : 61 - 72
  • [30] Voting methods, problems of majority rule, and demand-revealing procedures
    Michael C. Munger
    Public Choice, 2012, 152 : 61 - 72