Impact of water quality on setting of irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials

被引:5
|
作者
Bradna, Pavel
Cerna, Darina
机构
[1] Charles Univ, Fac Med 1, Inst Dent Res, Prague, Czech Republic
[2] Gen Univ Hosp, Prague, Czech Republic
[3] Spofa Dent AS, Dept Res & Dev, Prague, Czech Republic
来源
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY | 2006年 / 96卷 / 06期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.10.006
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Statement of problem. Setting of irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials is based on the ionic reaction between carboxylic groups and calcium ions and may, therefore, be affected by ionic species present in the mixing water. The impact of this phenomenon on the clinical performance of these materials has not been well documented. Purpose. The purpose of this study was to compare the setting behavior of irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials when mixed with tap and distilled water, and to determine the impact of typical cations present in tap water and their concentrations on the setting process. Material and methods. Six brands of irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials (Kromopan 100, Xantalgin Select FS, Alginoplast, Elastic Plus, Ypeen, and Ypeen Premium) were mixed with tap and distilled water (control) according to manufacturers' recommendations. Elastic Plus was also mixed with aqueous solutions containing various concentrations of NaCl, CaCl2, and AlCl3 to determine the role of typical cations on setting. Using a controlled shear stress oscillatory rheometer, time changes of storage (G') and loss (G") moduli during setting were measured at 23 degrees C and used to determine the working and setting times and rigidity of set impression materials. The sample size (n=3) for each material/mixing system was increased to 8 to increase reliability of measurements in systems where the effect of mixing water was low or variance of results was high. The data were analyzed (alpha=.05) using a t test (tap water), a 1-way ANOVA, a Tukey post hoc test (shear stress), and a nested ANOVA and Fisher Least Significant Difference post hoc analysis (cation and cation concentration). Results. Statistical analysis showed significant (P<.001) acceleration in the setting rate for Kromopan 100, the working time of which was shorter with tap water by 23.4 seconds and the setting time, by 32.8 seconds. Similar significant reductions (in seconds) in both working and setting times, respectively, were found with Xantalgin Select FS (12.0, P<.001 and 23.6, P<.002), Alginoplast (24.3, P<.001 and 44.7, P<.005), and Elastic Plus (23.0, P<.001 and 22.0, P<.002), when compared with the same materials mixed with distilled water. At the same time, the rigidity of the set impression materials mixed with tap water increased by approximately 10%. With Ypeen Premium, the setting time decreased significantly by 20.0 seconds (P<.001) with tap water, while the working time and rigidity did not change. The setting behavior of Ypeen was not significantly affected by water quality. Acceleration of the setting reactions and increase in impression rigidity depended (P<.001) primarily on concentration and valency of cations present in mixing water. Conclusion. Setting of irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials can be significantly accelerated when tap water with high water hardness is used for mixing or when the mixing water contains higher concentrations of cations such as Na+, Ca2+, and Al3+.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 448
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Dimensional Accuracy of 2 Irreversible Hydrocolloid Alternative Impression Materials with Immediate and Delayed Pouring
    Nassar, Usama
    Hussein, Bayan
    Oko, Andrea
    Carey, Jason P.
    Flores-Mir, Carlos
    JOURNAL OF THE CANADIAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2012, 78
  • [22] COMPARISON OF THE DIMENSIONAL ACCURACY OF A COMBINED REVERSIBLE IRREVERSIBLE HYDROCOLLOID IMPRESSION SYSTEM WITH OTHER COMMONLY USED IMPRESSION MATERIALS
    HERRING, HW
    TAMES, MA
    ZARDIACKAS, LD
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1984, 52 (06): : 795 - 799
  • [23] A CLINICAL AND LABORATORY COMPARISON OF IRREVERSIBLE HYDROCOLLOID IMPRESSION TECHNIQUES
    HOLLINGER, JO
    LORTON, L
    KRANTZ, WA
    CONNELLY, M
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1984, 51 (03): : 304 - 309
  • [24] ACCURACY OF A HYDROPHILIC IRREVERSIBLE HYDROCOLLOID SILICONE IMPRESSION MATERIAL
    DAVIS, DR
    PREBLE, JS
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1986, 55 (03): : 304 - 308
  • [25] LABORATORY EVALUATION OF THE REVERSIBLE IRREVERSIBLE HYDROCOLLOID IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE
    THOMASZ, FGV
    CHONG, MP
    TYAS, MJ
    AUSTRALIAN DENTAL JOURNAL, 1988, 33 (06) : 496 - 500
  • [26] THE COMBINED REVERSIBLE HYDROCOLLOID-IRREVERSIBLE HYDROCOLLOID IMPRESSION SYSTEM - CLINICAL-APPLICATION
    APPLEBY, DC
    COHEN, SR
    RACOWSKY, LP
    MINGLEDORFF, EB
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1981, 46 (01): : 48 - 58
  • [27] COMPATIBILITY OF IRREVERSIBLE HYDROCOLLOID AND RUBBER-BASED IMPRESSION MATERIALS WITH DENTAL STONES - SEM INVESTIGATION
    EWERS, GJ
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1974, 53 (03) : 708 - 708
  • [28] Facial moulage: The effect of a retarder on compressive strength and working and setting times of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material
    Lemon, JC
    Okay, DJ
    Powers, JM
    Martin, JW
    Chambers, MS
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2003, 90 (03): : 276 - 281
  • [29] Effect of storage time on mechanical properties of extended-pour irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials
    Sahin, Volkan
    Jodati, Hossein
    Evis, Zafer
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2020, 124 (01): : 69 - 74
  • [30] A study on the surface reproduction of dental stones with pH changes of dental irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials
    Byun, JD
    Kim, CW
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1997, 76 (05) : 1190 - 1190