Identifying high risk for proximal endograft failure after endovascular aneurysm repair in patients suitable for both open and endovascular elective aneurysm repair

被引:0
|
作者
van Schaik, Theodorus G. [1 ,2 ]
Meekel, Jorn P. [1 ,3 ]
de Bruin, Jorg L. [4 ]
Yeung, Kak K. [1 ]
Blankensteijn, Jan D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Vasc Surg, Med Ctr, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Elisabeth Tweesteden Ziekenhuis, Dept Surg, Tilburg, Netherlands
[3] Zaans Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Zaandam, Netherlands
[4] Erasmus MC, Dept Vasc Surg, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Endovascular aneurysm repair; Secondary intervention; Sealing failure; Neck morphology; ABDOMINAL AORTIC-ANEURYSM; LONG-TERM SURVIVAL; NECK DILATATION; FOLLOW-UP; PREDICTING REINTERVENTIONS; METAANALYSIS; OUTCOMES; SCORE; HOSTILE; RUPTURE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Proximal endograft failure (type Ia endoleak or migration) after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is associated with hostile aneurysm neck morphology. Neck scoring systems were developed to predict proximal endograft failure but were studied in retrospective studies, which, due to selection bias, may have led to an overestimation of bad outcomes after EVAR. To predict patients who benefit from open repair, preoperative neck morphology and occurrence of long-term proximal endograft failure were investigated in patients enrolled in the endovascular arm of the Dutch Randomized Endovascular Aneurysm Management (DREAM) trial who were suitable for open repair by definition and have long-term follow-up. Methods: A post-hoc on-treatment analysis of patients after EVAR was performed in 171 patients. Aneurysm neck morphology was quantified using the aneurysm severity grading (ASG) neck score calculated on preoperative computed tomography angiography images. The ASG neck score was used to predict proximal endograft failure. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to calculate a threshold to divide favorable and unfavorable aneurysm necks (low and high risk); positive and negative likelihood-ratios were calculated accordingly. Freedom from proximal endograft failure was compared between groups using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: During a median follow-up of 7.6 years, 20 patients suffered proximal endograft failure. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed an area under the curve of 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65-0.90; P < .001), indicating acceptable prediction. The threshold was determined at ASG neck score >= 5; 30 patients had unfavorable neck morphology, of whom 11 developed proximal endograft failure. The positive likelihood-ratio was 4.4 (95% CI, 2.5-7.8), and the negative likelihood-ratio was 0.51 (95% CI, 0.3-0.8). Twelve years postoperatively, freedom from proximal endograft failure was 91.7% in the favorable group and 53.2% in the unfavorable group, a difference of 38.5% (95% CI, 13.9-63.1; P < .001). Conclusions: In this study, the ASG neck score predicted proximal endograft failure during the entire follow-up. This exhibits the persistent risk for proximal endograft failure long after EVAR and calls for ongoing surveillance especially in patients with unfavorable aneurysm necks.
引用
收藏
页码:1261 / 1269
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] DREAM-trial collaborators. Identifying high risk for proximal endograft failure after endovascular aneurysm repair in patients suitable for both open and endovascular elective aneurysm repair (vol 76, pg 1261, 2022)
    van Schaik, T.
    Meekel, J. P.
    de Druin, J. L.
    Yeung, K. K.
    Blankensteijn, J. D.
    DREAM Trial Collaborators
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 77 (06) : 1853 - 1853
  • [2] Outcomes After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair with Zenith Fenestrated Endograft Versus Infrarenal Endovascular Aneurysm Repair
    Varkevisser, Rens
    O'Donnell, Thomas F. X.
    Pothof, Alexander B.
    Swerdlow, Nicholas J.
    Liang, Patric
    Li, Chun
    Verhagen, Hence
    Schermerhorn, Marc L.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 67 (06) : E110 - E111
  • [3] Open surgical repair after failed endovascular aneurysm repair: Is endograft removal necessary?
    Nabi, David
    Murphy, Erin H.
    Pak, Jimmy
    Zarins, Christopher K.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2009, 50 (04) : 714 - 721
  • [4] Open conversion after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair with the ovation prime™ endograft
    Georgiadis, G. S. (ggeorgia@med.duth.gr), 1600, Wichtig Publishing Srl (37):
  • [5] Open conversion after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair with the Ovation Prime™ endograft
    Georgiadis, George S.
    Charalampidis, Dimitrios
    Georgakarakos, Efstratios I.
    Antoniou, George A.
    Trellopoulos, George
    Vogiatzaki, Theodosia
    Lazarides, Miltos K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2014, 37 (02): : 177 - 181
  • [6] Thoracoabdominal Aneurysm Repair after Failed Endovascular Abdominal Aneurysm Repair Without Endograft Removal
    Stamou, Sotiris C.
    Kouchoukos, Nicholas T.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2010, 25 (05) : 554 - 556
  • [7] Open repair of type III endoleak with preservation of the endograft for a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm after endovascular aneurysm repair
    Bellamkonda, Kirthi
    Chaar, Cassius Iyad Ochoa
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY CASES INNOVATIONS AND TECHNIQUES, 2021, 7 (01): : 117 - 119
  • [8] Endovascular aneurysm repair in high-risk patients
    Chuter, TAM
    Reilly, LM
    Faruqi, RM
    Kerlan, RB
    Sawhney, R
    Canto, CJ
    LaBerge, JM
    Wilson, MW
    Gordon, RL
    Wall, SD
    Rapp, J
    Messina, LM
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2000, 31 (01) : 122 - 132
  • [9] Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm
    Polakw, Piotr
    Lukasiewicz, Adam
    Kordecki, Kazimierz
    Polakw, Jerzy
    Janica, Jacek
    POLISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2006, 71 (03) : 97 - 102
  • [10] Infrarenal endograft clamping in late open conversions after endovascular abdominal aneurysm repair
    Perini, Paolo
    de Troia, Alessandro
    Tecchio, Tiziano
    Azzarone, Matteo
    Massoni, Claudio Bianchini
    Salcuni, Pierfranco
    Salcuni, Pierfranco
    Freyrie, Antonio
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2017, 66 (04) : 1048 - 1055