Identifying high risk for proximal endograft failure after endovascular aneurysm repair in patients suitable for both open and endovascular elective aneurysm repair

被引:0
|
作者
van Schaik, Theodorus G. [1 ,2 ]
Meekel, Jorn P. [1 ,3 ]
de Bruin, Jorg L. [4 ]
Yeung, Kak K. [1 ]
Blankensteijn, Jan D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Vasc Surg, Med Ctr, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Elisabeth Tweesteden Ziekenhuis, Dept Surg, Tilburg, Netherlands
[3] Zaans Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Zaandam, Netherlands
[4] Erasmus MC, Dept Vasc Surg, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Endovascular aneurysm repair; Secondary intervention; Sealing failure; Neck morphology; ABDOMINAL AORTIC-ANEURYSM; LONG-TERM SURVIVAL; NECK DILATATION; FOLLOW-UP; PREDICTING REINTERVENTIONS; METAANALYSIS; OUTCOMES; SCORE; HOSTILE; RUPTURE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Proximal endograft failure (type Ia endoleak or migration) after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is associated with hostile aneurysm neck morphology. Neck scoring systems were developed to predict proximal endograft failure but were studied in retrospective studies, which, due to selection bias, may have led to an overestimation of bad outcomes after EVAR. To predict patients who benefit from open repair, preoperative neck morphology and occurrence of long-term proximal endograft failure were investigated in patients enrolled in the endovascular arm of the Dutch Randomized Endovascular Aneurysm Management (DREAM) trial who were suitable for open repair by definition and have long-term follow-up. Methods: A post-hoc on-treatment analysis of patients after EVAR was performed in 171 patients. Aneurysm neck morphology was quantified using the aneurysm severity grading (ASG) neck score calculated on preoperative computed tomography angiography images. The ASG neck score was used to predict proximal endograft failure. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to calculate a threshold to divide favorable and unfavorable aneurysm necks (low and high risk); positive and negative likelihood-ratios were calculated accordingly. Freedom from proximal endograft failure was compared between groups using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: During a median follow-up of 7.6 years, 20 patients suffered proximal endograft failure. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed an area under the curve of 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65-0.90; P < .001), indicating acceptable prediction. The threshold was determined at ASG neck score >= 5; 30 patients had unfavorable neck morphology, of whom 11 developed proximal endograft failure. The positive likelihood-ratio was 4.4 (95% CI, 2.5-7.8), and the negative likelihood-ratio was 0.51 (95% CI, 0.3-0.8). Twelve years postoperatively, freedom from proximal endograft failure was 91.7% in the favorable group and 53.2% in the unfavorable group, a difference of 38.5% (95% CI, 13.9-63.1; P < .001). Conclusions: In this study, the ASG neck score predicted proximal endograft failure during the entire follow-up. This exhibits the persistent risk for proximal endograft failure long after EVAR and calls for ongoing surveillance especially in patients with unfavorable aneurysm necks.
引用
收藏
页码:1261 / 1269
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Frailty in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm predicts prognosis after elective endovascular aneurysm repair
    Morisaki, Koichi
    Furuyama, Tadashi
    Yoshiya, Keiji
    Kurose, Shun
    Yoshino, Shinichiro
    Nakayama, Ken
    Yamashita, Sho
    Kawakubo, Eisuke
    Matsumoto, Takuya
    Mori, Masaki
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 72 (01) : 138 - 143
  • [22] Comparable mid-term survival in patients undergoing elective fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair and endovascular aneurysm repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm
    Nessvi, Sofia
    Gottsater, Anders
    Acosta, Stefan
    SAGE OPEN MEDICINE, 2014, 2
  • [23] Long-Term Survival After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair and Open Repair in Patients With Anatomy Outside Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Instructions for Use Criteria
    Charbonneau, Philippe
    Hongku, Kiattisak
    Herman, Christine R.
    Habib, Mohammed
    Girsowicz, Elie
    Dubois, Luc
    Hossain, Sajjid
    Gill, Heather
    Mackenzie, Kent
    Corriveau, Marc-Michel
    Bayne, Jason
    Obrand, Daniel
    Steinmetz, Oren K.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 68 (03) : E75 - E75
  • [24] The role of elective endovascular aneurysm repair today
    Marty, B.
    Enzler, M.
    VASA-JOURNAL OF VASCULAR DISEASES, 2007, 36 (01): : 3 - 4
  • [25] Defining risk and identifying predictors of mortality for open conversion after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair
    Scali, Salvatore T.
    Beck, Adam W.
    Chang, Catherine K.
    Neal, Dan
    Feezor, Robert J.
    Stone, David H.
    Berceli, Scott A.
    Huber, Thomas S.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2016, 63 (04) : 873 - +
  • [26] Late Open Interventions After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair
    Elkady, Ramy
    Tawfick, Wael
    Hynes, Niamh
    Sultan, Sherif
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 68 (05) : E136 - E136
  • [27] Readmissions after Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Differences between Open Repair and Endovascular Aneurysm Repair
    Casey, Kevin M.
    Hernandez-Boussard, Tina
    Al-Khatib, Weesam K.
    Mell, Matthew W.
    Lee, Jason T.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 54 (02) : 590 - 590
  • [28] Predicting failure of endovascular aneurysm repair
    Harris, PL
    Dimitri, S
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1999, 17 (01) : 1 - 2
  • [29] Defining high-risk patients for endovascular aneurysm repair
    Egorova, Natalia
    Giacovelli, Jeannine K.
    Gelijns, Annetine
    Greco, Giampaolo
    Moskowitz, Alan
    McKinsey, James
    Kent, K. Craig
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2009, 50 (06) : 1271 - 1279
  • [30] Differences in readmissions after open repair versus endovascular aneurysm repair
    Casey, Kevin
    Hernandez-Boussard, Tina
    Mell, Matthew W.
    Lee, Jason T.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2013, 57 (01) : 89 - 95