Is Non-Homologous End-Joining Really an Inherently Error-Prone Process?

被引:288
|
作者
Betermier, Mireille [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bertrand, Pascale [4 ,5 ]
Lopez, Bernard S. [3 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] CNRS, UPR3404, Ctr Genet Mol, Gif Sur Yvette, France
[2] CNRS, Ctr Rech Gif Sur Yvette, FRC3115, Gif Sur Yvette, France
[3] Univ Paris 11, Dept Biol, Orsay, France
[4] CEA, DSV, Inst Radiobiol Mol & Cellulaire, Lab Reparat & Vieillissement, Fontenay Aux Roses, France
[5] CNRS, UMR 8200, Villejuif, France
[6] Inst Cancerol, Villejuif, France
关键词
DOUBLE-STRAND BREAKS; TERMINAL DEOXYNUCLEOTIDYL TRANSFERASE; CHROMOSOMAL TRANSLOCATION FORMATION; INTERNAL ELIMINATED SEQUENCES; CLASS SWITCH RECOMBINATION; DEPENDENT PROTEIN-KINASE; DNA-LIGASE-IV; MAMMALIAN-CELLS; SACCHAROMYCES-CEREVISIAE; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pgen.1004086
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are harmful lesions leading to genomic instability or diversity. Non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) is a prominent DSB repair pathway, which has long been considered to be error-prone. However, recent data have pointed to the intrinsic precision of NHEJ. Three reasons can account for the apparent fallibility of NHEJ: 1) the existence of a highly error-prone alternative end-joining process; 2) the adaptability of canonical C-NHEJ (Ku- and Xrcc4/ligase IV-dependent) to imperfect complementary ends; and 3) the requirement to first process chemically incompatible DNA ends that cannot be ligated directly. Thus, C-NHEJ is conservative but adaptable, and the accuracy of the repair is dictated by the structure of the DNA ends rather than by the C-NHEJ machinery. We present data from different organisms that describe the conservative/versatile properties of C-NHEJ. The advantages of the adaptability/versatility of C-NHEJ are discussed for the development of the immune repertoire and the resistance to ionizing radiation, especially at low doses, and for targeted genome manipulation.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Homologous recombination, non-homologous end-joining and cell cycle:: Genome's angels
    Delacôte, F
    Guirouilh-Barbat, J
    Lambert, S
    Lopez, BS
    CURRENT GENOMICS, 2004, 5 (01) : 49 - 58
  • [32] Role of DNA homologous recombination and non-homologous end-joining in the maintenance of chromosomal integrity
    Sasaki, MS
    Sonoda, E
    Takata, M
    Takeda, S
    RADIATION RESEARCH, VOL 2, CONGRESS PROCEEDINGS, 2000, : 476 - 479
  • [33] End-processing during non-homologous end-joining: a role for exonuclease 1
    Bahmed, Karim
    Seth, Aman
    Nitiss, Karin C.
    Nitiss, John L.
    NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2011, 39 (03) : 970 - 978
  • [34] The absence of Ku but not defects in classical non-homologous end-joining is required to trigger PARP1-dependent end-joining
    Mansour, Wael Y.
    Borgmann, K.
    Petersen, C.
    Dikomey, Ekkehard
    Dahm-Daphi, Jochen
    DNA REPAIR, 2013, 12 (12) : 1134 - 1142
  • [35] A curious new role for MRN in Schizosaccharomyces pombe non-homologous end-joining
    Kurt W. Runge
    Yanhui Li
    Current Genetics, 2018, 64 : 359 - 364
  • [36] DNA polymerase μ is a global player in the repair of non-homologous end-joining substrates
    Chayot, Romain
    Montagne, Benjamin
    Ricchetti, Miria
    DNA REPAIR, 2012, 11 (01) : 22 - 34
  • [37] A curious new role for MRN in Schizosaccharomyces pombe non-homologous end-joining
    Runge, Kurt W.
    Li, Yanhui
    CURRENT GENETICS, 2018, 64 (02) : 359 - 364
  • [38] Gene expression of non-homologous end-joining pathways in the prognosis of ovarian cancer
    Lavi, Ethan S.
    Lin, Z. Ping
    Ratner, Elena S.
    ISCIENCE, 2023, 26 (10)
  • [39] Up-Regulation of Non-Homologous End-Joining by MUC1
    Bessho, Tadayoshi
    GENES, 2024, 15 (06)
  • [40] Tagging SNPs in non-homologous end-joining pathway genes and risk of glioma
    Liu, Yanhong
    Zhang, Haishi
    Zhou, Keke
    Chen, Lina
    Xu, Zhonghui
    Zhong, Yu
    Liu, Hongliang
    Li, Rui
    Shugart, Yin Yao
    Wei, Qingyi
    Jin, Li
    Huang, Fengping
    Lu, Daru
    Zhou, Liangfu
    CARCINOGENESIS, 2007, 28 (09) : 1906 - 1913