Is Non-Homologous End-Joining Really an Inherently Error-Prone Process?

被引:288
|
作者
Betermier, Mireille [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bertrand, Pascale [4 ,5 ]
Lopez, Bernard S. [3 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] CNRS, UPR3404, Ctr Genet Mol, Gif Sur Yvette, France
[2] CNRS, Ctr Rech Gif Sur Yvette, FRC3115, Gif Sur Yvette, France
[3] Univ Paris 11, Dept Biol, Orsay, France
[4] CEA, DSV, Inst Radiobiol Mol & Cellulaire, Lab Reparat & Vieillissement, Fontenay Aux Roses, France
[5] CNRS, UMR 8200, Villejuif, France
[6] Inst Cancerol, Villejuif, France
关键词
DOUBLE-STRAND BREAKS; TERMINAL DEOXYNUCLEOTIDYL TRANSFERASE; CHROMOSOMAL TRANSLOCATION FORMATION; INTERNAL ELIMINATED SEQUENCES; CLASS SWITCH RECOMBINATION; DEPENDENT PROTEIN-KINASE; DNA-LIGASE-IV; MAMMALIAN-CELLS; SACCHAROMYCES-CEREVISIAE; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pgen.1004086
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are harmful lesions leading to genomic instability or diversity. Non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) is a prominent DSB repair pathway, which has long been considered to be error-prone. However, recent data have pointed to the intrinsic precision of NHEJ. Three reasons can account for the apparent fallibility of NHEJ: 1) the existence of a highly error-prone alternative end-joining process; 2) the adaptability of canonical C-NHEJ (Ku- and Xrcc4/ligase IV-dependent) to imperfect complementary ends; and 3) the requirement to first process chemically incompatible DNA ends that cannot be ligated directly. Thus, C-NHEJ is conservative but adaptable, and the accuracy of the repair is dictated by the structure of the DNA ends rather than by the C-NHEJ machinery. We present data from different organisms that describe the conservative/versatile properties of C-NHEJ. The advantages of the adaptability/versatility of C-NHEJ are discussed for the development of the immune repertoire and the resistance to ionizing radiation, especially at low doses, and for targeted genome manipulation.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Structural and Functional Insights into the Non-Homologous End-Joining Pathway
    Lees-Miller, S. P.
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MUTAGENESIS, 2010, 51 (07) : 703 - 703
  • [22] DNA non-homologous end-joining enters the resection arena
    Jeggo, Penny A.
    Loebrich, Markus
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (55) : 93317 - 93318
  • [23] Mechanism and regulation of human non-homologous DNA end-joining
    Lieber, MR
    Ma, YM
    Pannicke, U
    Schwarz, K
    NATURE REVIEWS MOLECULAR CELL BIOLOGY, 2003, 4 (09) : 712 - 720
  • [24] A role for protein phosphatase 4 in regulating non-homologous end-joining
    Davis, Anthony J.
    Chen, David J.
    CELL CYCLE, 2012, 11 (19) : 3534 - 3535
  • [25] The non-homologous end-joining pathway is involved in stable transformation in rice
    Saika, Hiroaki
    Nishizawa-Yokoi, Ayako
    Toki, Seiichi
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2014, 5
  • [26] Genetic and physiological regulation of non-homologous end-joining in mammalian cells
    Tachibana, A
    NOVEL DEVELOPMENTS ON GENETIC RECOMBINATION: DNA DOUBLE STRAND BREAK AND DNA END-JOINING, 2004, 38 : 21 - 44
  • [27] A single-molecule view on non-homologous end-joining in bacteria
    Westerlund, Fredrik
    Pavlova, Evgeniya
    Budida, Anusha
    Persson, Elin
    Oz, Robin
    Sriram, K. K.
    Guerois, Raphael
    EUROPEAN BIOPHYSICS JOURNAL WITH BIOPHYSICS LETTERS, 2023, 52 (SUPPL 1): : S213 - S213
  • [28] Canonical DNA non-homologous end-joining; capacity versus fidelity
    Shibata, Atsushi
    Jeggo, Penny A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 93 (1115):
  • [29] Non-homologous end-joining at challenged replication forks: an RNA connection?
    Audoynaud, Charlotte
    Vagner, Stephan
    Lambert, Sarah
    TRENDS IN GENETICS, 2021, 37 (11) : 973 - 985
  • [30] Reprint of "The clinical impact of deficiency in DNA non-homologous end-joining"
    Woodbine, Lisa
    Gennery, Andrew R.
    Jeggo, Penny A.
    DNA REPAIR, 2014, 17 : 9 - 20