Is Non-Homologous End-Joining Really an Inherently Error-Prone Process?

被引:288
|
作者
Betermier, Mireille [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bertrand, Pascale [4 ,5 ]
Lopez, Bernard S. [3 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] CNRS, UPR3404, Ctr Genet Mol, Gif Sur Yvette, France
[2] CNRS, Ctr Rech Gif Sur Yvette, FRC3115, Gif Sur Yvette, France
[3] Univ Paris 11, Dept Biol, Orsay, France
[4] CEA, DSV, Inst Radiobiol Mol & Cellulaire, Lab Reparat & Vieillissement, Fontenay Aux Roses, France
[5] CNRS, UMR 8200, Villejuif, France
[6] Inst Cancerol, Villejuif, France
关键词
DOUBLE-STRAND BREAKS; TERMINAL DEOXYNUCLEOTIDYL TRANSFERASE; CHROMOSOMAL TRANSLOCATION FORMATION; INTERNAL ELIMINATED SEQUENCES; CLASS SWITCH RECOMBINATION; DEPENDENT PROTEIN-KINASE; DNA-LIGASE-IV; MAMMALIAN-CELLS; SACCHAROMYCES-CEREVISIAE; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pgen.1004086
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are harmful lesions leading to genomic instability or diversity. Non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) is a prominent DSB repair pathway, which has long been considered to be error-prone. However, recent data have pointed to the intrinsic precision of NHEJ. Three reasons can account for the apparent fallibility of NHEJ: 1) the existence of a highly error-prone alternative end-joining process; 2) the adaptability of canonical C-NHEJ (Ku- and Xrcc4/ligase IV-dependent) to imperfect complementary ends; and 3) the requirement to first process chemically incompatible DNA ends that cannot be ligated directly. Thus, C-NHEJ is conservative but adaptable, and the accuracy of the repair is dictated by the structure of the DNA ends rather than by the C-NHEJ machinery. We present data from different organisms that describe the conservative/versatile properties of C-NHEJ. The advantages of the adaptability/versatility of C-NHEJ are discussed for the development of the immune repertoire and the resistance to ionizing radiation, especially at low doses, and for targeted genome manipulation.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Alternative Non-Homologous End-Joining: Error-Prone DNA Repair as Cancer's Achilles' Heel
    Caracciolo, Daniele
    Riillo, Caterina
    Di Martino, Maria Teresa
    Tagliaferri, Pierosandro
    Tassone, Pierfrancesco
    CANCERS, 2021, 13 (06) : 1 - 14
  • [2] Chk2 phosphorylation controls BRCA1 in regulating error-prone non-homologous end-joining
    Xia, F
    Zhang, J
    Powell, SN
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 60 (01): : S342 - S343
  • [3] The Kudos of non-homologous end-joining
    Arthur J Lustig
    Nature Genetics, 1999, 23 : 130 - 131
  • [4] The Kudos of non-homologous end-joining
    Lustig, AJ
    NATURE GENETICS, 1999, 23 (02) : 130 - 131
  • [5] The endless tale of non-homologous end-joining
    Eric Weterings
    David J Chen
    Cell Research, 2008, 18 : 114 - 124
  • [6] Non-homologous end-joining, a sticky affair
    D C van Gent
    M van der Burg
    Oncogene, 2007, 26 : 7731 - 7740
  • [7] Non-homologous end-joining, a sticky affair
    van Gent, D. C.
    van der Burg, M.
    ONCOGENE, 2007, 26 (56) : 7731 - 7740
  • [8] The endless tale of non-homologous end-joining
    Weterings, Eric
    Chen, David J.
    CELL RESEARCH, 2008, 18 (01) : 114 - 124
  • [9] Non-homologous end-joining factors of Saccharomyces cerevisiae
    Dudásová, Z
    Dudás, A
    Chovanec, M
    FEMS MICROBIOLOGY REVIEWS, 2004, 28 (05) : 581 - 601
  • [10] Restricting the ligation step of non-homologous end-joining
    Chovanec, Miroslav
    Wilson, Thomas E.
    DNA REPAIR, 2007, 6 (12) : 1890 - 1893