Comparison of two commercially available ELISAs for circulating sclerostin

被引:30
|
作者
Costa, A. G. [1 ,2 ]
Cremers, S. [1 ,3 ]
Dworakowski, E. [1 ]
Lazaretti-Castro, M. [2 ]
Bilezikian, J. P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Coll Physicians & Surg, Dept Med, Dept Endocrinol,Metab Bone Dis Unit, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Med, Div Endocrinol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Columbia Univ, Coll Physicians & Surg, Dept Pathol & Cell Biol, Div Clin Pathol, New York, NY 10032 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
ELISA; Metabolic bone diseases; Osteoporosis; Sclerostin; Validation; SERUM SCLEROSTIN; BONE TURNOVER; WOMEN; OSTEOPOROSIS; REGULATOR; MARKERS; DENSITY; MEN;
D O I
10.1007/s00198-014-2635-3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
This study investigates the performance and correlation of sclerostin measurements by two commercially available sclerostin ELISAs from TECOmedical and Biomedica. We found that the correlation between the results of two sclerostin assays is strong. Circulating sclerostin levels may provide insight into the pathophysiology of metabolic bone diseases such as osteoporosis. However, recent studies suggest that commercially available assays give different results. We compare the analytical performance of the two most used commercially available sclerostin ELISAs from TECOmedical and Biomedica. Sclerostin levels were assessed in 20 paired serum, EDTA, and heparin plasma convenience samples from hospitalized patients. In addition, sclerostin was measured in serum samples from 34 patients with metabolic bone diseases and from 10 patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Samples from three healthy donors were used to determine stability and intra- and inter- assay precision. The average serum sclerostin concentration of all patients (n = 64) was 0.713 +/- 0.58 ng/mL with the Biomedica assay and 0.734 +/- 0.43 ng/mL with the TECO assay (p < 0.05). The results correlated strongly (r = 0.9; p < 0.0001), with Passing-Bablok regression showing a linear relationship but with a slight systematic and proportional difference between both assays. Sclerostin levels were about 30 % higher in plasma than in serum for both assays, while no significant difference was seen between EDTA and heparin plasma. Intra- and inter- precision were < 10 % for TECO and < 20 % for Biomedica. Samples were stable for up to three freeze-thaw cycles with both assays. The two commercially available ELISAs for measuring circulating levels of sclerostin are comparable. However, given the small but statistically significant systematic and proportional differences between both assays, results and reference ranges will be assay-specific. Results will also be specific to serum or plasma.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:1547 / 1554
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of two commercially available ELISAs for circulating sclerostin
    A. G. Costa
    S. Cremers
    E. Dworakowski
    M. Lazaretti-Castro
    J. P. Bilezikian
    Osteoporosis International, 2014, 25 : 1547 - 1554
  • [2] Validation and comparison of two commercially available ELISAs for circulating sclerostin
    Costa, A. G.
    Cremers, S.
    Dworakowski, E.
    Nickolas, T. L.
    Rubin, M. R.
    Walker, M. D.
    Stein, E. M.
    Lazaretti-Castro, M.
    Silverberg, S. J.
    Bilezikian, J. P.
    BONE, 2012, 50 : S133 - S134
  • [3] How accurate is your sclerostin measurement? Comparison between two commercially available sclerostin ELISA kits
    Piec, Isabelle
    Fisher, Emily
    Washbourne, Christopher
    Tang, Jonathan
    Fraser, William
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2014, 29 : S291 - S291
  • [4] How Accurate is Your Sclerostin Measurement? Comparison Between Three Commercially Available Sclerostin ELISA Kits
    Isabelle Piec
    Christopher Washbourne
    Jonathan Tang
    Emily Fisher
    Julie Greeves
    Sarah Jackson
    William D. Fraser
    Calcified Tissue International, 2016, 98 : 546 - 555
  • [5] How Accurate is Your Sclerostin Measurement? Comparison Between Three Commercially Available Sclerostin ELISA Kits
    Piec, Isabelle
    Washbourne, Christopher
    Tang, Jonathan
    Fisher, Emily
    Greeves, Julie
    Jackson, Sarah
    Fraser, William D.
    CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 98 (06) : 546 - 555
  • [6] Evaluation of two commercially available ELISAs for the diagnosis of Japanese encephalitis applied to field samples
    Lewthwaite, Penny
    Shankar, M. Veera
    Tio, Phaik-Hooi
    Daly, Janet
    Last, Anna
    Ravikumar, R.
    Desai, Anita
    Ravi, V.
    Cardosa, Jane M.
    Solomon, Tom
    TROPICAL MEDICINE & INTERNATIONAL HEALTH, 2010, 15 (07) : 811 - 818
  • [7] Determining specificity of commercially available ELISAs for Clavibacter michiganensis subspecies
    Korus, K. A.
    Ziems, A. D.
    Vidaver, A. K.
    Jackson, T. A.
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2010, 100 (06) : S187 - S187
  • [8] Comparison of two commercially available cryoballoon ablation systems
    Diofano, F.
    Pflieger, C.
    Teumer, Y.
    Bothner, C.
    Rottbauer, W.
    Dahme, T.
    Weinmann, K.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2023, 44
  • [9] Optimization of Capture ELISAs for Chicken Cytokines Using Commercially Available Antibodies
    Krzysica, Paulina
    Verhoog, Loes
    de Vries, Sonja
    Smits, Coen
    Savelkoul, Huub F. J.
    Tijhaar, Edwin
    ANIMALS, 2022, 12 (21):
  • [10] Comparison Of Raw Acceleration From Two Commercially Available Accelerometers
    John, Dinesh
    Sasaki, Jeffer E.
    Staudenmayer, John
    Freedson, Patty S.
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2013, 45 (05): : 621 - 622