Bilateral Continuous Automated Distraction Osteogenesis: Proof of Principle

被引:8
|
作者
Peacock, Zachary S. [1 ]
Tricomi, Brad J. [2 ]
Faquin, William C. [3 ]
Magill, John C. [4 ]
Murphy, Brian A. [4 ]
Kaban, Leonard B. [1 ]
Troulis, Maria J. [5 ]
机构
[1] Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Boston, MA USA
[2] Univ Massachusetts, Boston, MA 02125 USA
[3] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Pathol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[4] Phys Sci Inc, Andover, MA 01810 USA
[5] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
Automated continuous distraction osteogenesis; distraction wound; mandibular distraction osteogenesis; regenerate; BONE DISTRACTION; HISTOMORPHOMETRIC ANALYSIS; MANDIBULAR DEFORMITIES; CLINICAL-APPLICATION; DEVICE; FREQUENCY; MINIPIGS; TISSUES; REGENERATION; MYOCYTES;
D O I
10.1097/SCS.0000000000001996
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this study was to demonstrate that automated, continuous, curvilinear distraction osteogenesis (DO) in a minipig model is effective when performed bilaterally, at rates up to 3mm/day, to achieve clinically relevant lengthening.A Yucatan minipig in the mixed dentition phase underwent bilaterally, at a continuous DO at a rate of 2mm/day at the center of rotation; 1.0 and 3.0mm/day at the superior and inferior regions, respectively. The distraction period was 13 days with no latency period. Vector and rate of distraction were remotely monitored without radiographs, using the device sensor. After fixation and euthanasia, the mandible and digastric muscles were harvested. The ex vivo appearance, stability, and radiodensity of the regenerate were evaluated using a semiquantitative scale. Percent surface area (PSA) occupied by bone, fibrous tissue, cartilage, and hematoma were calculated using histomorphometrics. The effects of DO on the digastric muscles and mandibular condyles were assessed via microscopy, and degenerative changes were quantified.The animal was distracted to 21mm and 24mm on the right and left sides, respectively. Clinical appearance, stability, and radiodensity were scored as 3 bilaterally indicating osseous union. The total PSA occupied by bone (right=75.532.19%; left PSA=73.11 +/- 2.18%) approached that of an unoperated mandible (84.67 +/- 0.86%). Digastric muscles and condyles showed negligible degenerative or abnormal histologic changes.This proof of principle study is the first report of osseous healing with no ill-effect on associated soft tissue and the mandibular condyle using bilateral, automated, continuous, and curvilinear DO at rates up to 3mm/day. The model approximates potential human application of continuous automated distraction with a semiburied device.
引用
收藏
页码:2320 / 2324
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Continuous distraction osteogenesis device with MAAC controller for mandibular reconstruction applications
    Shahrokh Hatefi
    Milad Etemadi Sh
    Yimesker Yihun
    Roozbeh Mansouri
    Alireza Akhlaghi
    BioMedical Engineering OnLine, 18
  • [32] Continuous distraction osteogenesis device with MAAC controller for mandibular reconstruction applications
    Hatefi, Shahrokh
    Etemadi, Milad Sh
    Yihun, Yimesker
    Mansouri, Roozbeh
    Akhlaghi, Alireza
    BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING ONLINE, 2019, 18 (1)
  • [33] Review of automatic continuous distraction osteogenesis devices for mandibular reconstruction applications
    Shahrokh Hatefi
    Katayoun Hatefi
    Francis Le Roux
    Javad Alizargar
    Zeinolabedin Behdadipour
    Yimesker Yihun
    Khaled Abou-El-Hossein
    BioMedical Engineering OnLine, 19
  • [34] Review of automatic continuous distraction osteogenesis devices for mandibular reconstruction applications
    Hatefi, Shahrokh
    Hatefi, Katayoun
    Le Roux, Francis
    Alizargar, Javad
    Behdadipour, Zeinolabedin
    Yihun, Yimesker
    Abou-El-Hossein, Khaled
    BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING ONLINE, 2020, 19 (01)
  • [35] Continuous Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis: Novel Device and Preliminary Results in Minipigs
    Goldwaser, Batya R.
    Magill, John
    Papadaki, Maria E.
    Byl, Martyn
    Kromann, Roger
    Yates, Brent
    Morency, Joe
    Kaban, Leonard B.
    Troulis, Maria J.
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2013, 71 (04) : E168 - E177
  • [36] Distraction Osteogenesis for Brachymetatarsia
    Haleem, Amgad M.
    Ellis, Scott J.
    Fragomen, Austin T.
    TECHNIQUES IN FOOT AND ANKLE SURGERY, 2014, 13 (04): : 184 - 190
  • [37] Maxillomandibular Distraction Osteogenesis
    Efunkoya, Akinwale A.
    Bamgbose, Babatunde O.
    Adebola, Rafael A.
    Adeoye, Joshua B.
    Akpasa, Izegboya O.
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2014, 25 (05) : 1787 - 1792
  • [38] Craniofacial distraction osteogenesis
    Hollier, LH
    Gosain, A
    Stelnecki, E
    Longaker, M
    McCarthy, JG
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 1999, 10 (03) : 268 - 282
  • [39] Distraction osteogenesis in craniosynostosis
    Sandhaus, Henya
    Johnson, Matthew D.
    CURRENT OPINION IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY & HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2021, 29 (04): : 304 - 313
  • [40] Alveolar distraction osteogenesis
    Chang, Hong-Po
    Chou, Tsau-Mau
    Tseng, Yu-Chuan
    Hsu, Han-Jen
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCIENCES, 2016, 11 (02) : 212 - 213