Evaluating IT/IS investments: A fuzzy multi-criteria decision model approach

被引:78
|
作者
Chou, Tzy-Yuan
Chou, Seng-cho T.
Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ, Dept Informat Management, Taipei 106, Taiwan
[2] Natl Chiao Tung Univ, Inst Management Technol, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan
[3] Kainan Univ, Dept Business Adm, Taoyuan 338, Taiwan
关键词
fuzzy theory; IS evaluation; IT evaluation; IT portfolio; multi-criteria decision making;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2005.07.003
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
IT/IS represents a substantial financial investment for many organizations. Whether or not to invest in new IT/IS is, therefore, a difficult decision. Simply considering human resource cost saving criteria is not enough, especially when a corporation has had many information systems. What kind of criteria should we consider when we evaluate IT/IS? How can a new IT/IS project be evaluated in an easy, cost-effective, and collective manner? We need a tool that will help decision-makers evaluate potential new investment projects. Apart from evaluating the new project per se, its compatibility and ability to integrate with an existing IT portfolio must also be considered. Hence, we propose a new approach based on the fuzzy multi-criteria decision model (FMCDM), featuring a 2-stage evaluation process with 26 criteria for IT/IS investment. All stakeholders in a corporation can decide the relative weights they give to the criteria when they evaluate a new IT/IS project by using linguistic values. Experts can also use linguistic values to evaluate all candidates easily. Only an Excel worksheet is needed to obtain an evaluation result. It is cost-effective and efficient. We conduct a case study to show how this model can be used and discuss the results. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1026 / 1046
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Fuzzy Group Multi-Criteria Decision-Making on Selecting & Evaluating of AMT
    Zhu, Xiaoxia
    Zhang, Weiwei
    ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, PTS 1-4, 2012, 472-475 : 3163 - 3170
  • [22] Multi-person multi-criteria decision making: intuitionistic fuzzy approach and generalized net model
    Pasi, G
    Atanassov, K
    Pinto, PM
    Yager, R
    Atanassova, V
    CONCURRENT ENGINEERING: ADVANCED DESIGN, PRODUCTION AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, 2003, : 1073 - 1078
  • [23] Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making for evaluating mutual fund strategies
    Wang, Shin-Yun
    Lee, Cheng-Few
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2011, 43 (24) : 3405 - 3414
  • [24] Evaluating Government Websites Using a Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach
    Buyukozkan, Guelcin
    9TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON E-GOVERNMENT, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 190 - 199
  • [25] Fuzzy multi-criteria approach for criticality assessment and optimization of decision making
    Chakhrit, Ammar
    Chennoufi, Mohammed
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2021, 41 (02) : 2701 - 2716
  • [26] A FUZZY MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS APPROACH FOR RETAIL LOCATION SELECTION
    Tolga, A. Cagri
    Tuysuz, Fatih
    Kahraman, Cengiz
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2013, 12 (04) : 729 - 755
  • [27] A fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach for software development strategy selection
    Büyüközkan, G
    Kahraman, C
    Ruan, D
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENERAL SYSTEMS, 2004, 33 (2-3) : 259 - 280
  • [28] Explain a model for measuring the tone of financial statements using a multi-criteria decision model with a fuzzy approach
    Harivand, Ali Asghar Khazaei
    Naderian, Arash
    Ashrafi, Majid
    Khozin, Ali
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NONLINEAR ANALYSIS AND APPLICATIONS, 2021, 12 : 297 - 309
  • [29] A multi-criteria decision-making model to increase productivity: AHP and fuzzy AHP approach
    Department of Industrial and Production Engineering, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh
    不详
    Int. J. Intell. Syst. Technol. Appl., 2013, 3-4 (207-229):
  • [30] FUZZY MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING ALGORITHMS
    Peneva, Vania
    Popchev, Ivan
    COMPTES RENDUS DE L ACADEMIE BULGARE DES SCIENCES, 2010, 63 (07): : 979 - 992