Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making for evaluating mutual fund strategies

被引:6
|
作者
Wang, Shin-Yun [1 ]
Lee, Cheng-Few [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Dong Hwa Univ, Dept Finance, Shoufeng 974, Hualien, Taiwan
[2] Rutgers State Univ, Rutgers Business Sch, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
[3] Kainan Univ, Dept Banking & Finance, Tao Yuan 33857, Taiwan
关键词
INVESTMENT PERFORMANCE; MARKET; MODEL; SELECTIVITY; PORTFOLIOS;
D O I
10.1080/00036841003636318
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Investors often need to evaluate investment strategies according to their own subjective preferences based upon various criteria. This situation can be regarded as a Fuzzy Multiple Criteria Decision-Making (FMCDM) problem. The purpose of this study is to propose an FMCDM approach with fuzzy integral. This approach relaxes the independence assumption among criteria for the evaluation of the Multiple Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) problems, which is oftentimes the basic assumption in applying hierarchical system for evaluating the strategies of selecting investment style. We also employ Triangular Fuzzy Numbers (TFNs) to represent the decision-makers' subjective preferences on the criteria, as well as for the criteria measurements to evaluate mutual funds investment style. To achieve this objective, first, we employ factor analysis to extract four independent common factors from those criteria. Second, we construct the evaluation frame using hierarchical system composed of four common factors with 16 evaluation criteria, and then derive the relative weights with respect to the considered criteria. Third, the synthetic utility value corresponding to each mutual fund's investment style is aggregated by the fuzzy weights with fuzzy performance values. Finally, we compare with empirical data and find that the model of FMCDM predicts the rate of return very accurately in certain ranges of lambda, hence the nonadditive fuzzy integral technique is an effective method for evaluating mutual funds' strategy.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:3405 / 3414
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Fuzzy Group Multi-Criteria Decision-Making on Selecting & Evaluating of AMT
    Zhu, Xiaoxia
    Zhang, Weiwei
    ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, PTS 1-4, 2012, 472-475 : 3163 - 3170
  • [2] A novel fuzzy hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach for evaluating maintenance strategies in petrochemical industry
    Aghaee, Asghar
    Aghaee, Milad
    Fathi, Mohammad Reza
    Shoa'bin, Shirin
    Sobhani, Seyed Mohammad
    JOURNAL OF QUALITY IN MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING, 2021, 27 (02) : 351 - 365
  • [3] When is a Decision-Making Method Trustworthy? Criteria for Evaluating Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods
    Saaty, Thomas L.
    Ergu, Daji
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2015, 14 (06) : 1171 - 1187
  • [4] An extension of fuzzy decision maps for multi-criteria decision-making
    Elomda, Basem Mohamed
    Hefny, Hesham Ahmed
    Hassan, Hesham Ahmed
    EGYPTIAN INFORMATICS JOURNAL, 2013, 14 (02) : 147 - 155
  • [5] A fuzzy multi-criteria emergency decision-making method
    Wu, Wen-Shuai
    Kou, Gang
    Peng, Yi
    Shi, Yong
    Xitong Gongcheng Lilun yu Shijian/System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2012, 32 (06): : 1298 - 1304
  • [6] Fuzzy α-discounting method for multi-criteria decision-making
    Karaman, Atilla
    Dagdeviren, Metin
    JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERS, 2015, 38 (07) : 855 - 865
  • [7] Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making in the assignment problem
    DrorRein, E
    Mitchell, HB
    SIGNAL AND DATA PROCESSING OF SMALL TARGETS 1997, 1997, 3163 : 525 - 534
  • [8] FUZZY-SETS AND MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING
    TONG, RM
    HUMAN SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT, 1982, 3 (04): : 266 - 268
  • [9] A Hybrid Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model for Evaluating the Influence of Industry 4.0 Technologies on Manufacturing Strategies
    Abdullah, Fawaz M. M.
    Al-Ahmari, Abdulrahman M. M.
    Anwar, Saqib
    MACHINES, 2023, 11 (02)
  • [10] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
    Encheva, Sylvia
    MICBE '09: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH WSEAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS, 2009, : 192 - +