Hybrid volumetric-modulated arc therapy for postoperative breast cancer including regional lymph nodes: the advantage of dosimetric data and safety of toxicities

被引:12
|
作者
Doi, Yoshiko [1 ,2 ]
Nakao, Minoru [1 ]
Miura, Hideharu [1 ]
Ozawa, Shuichi [1 ]
Kenjo, Masahiro [1 ]
Nagata, Yasushi [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hiroshima High Precis Radiotherapy Canc Ctr, Higashi Ku, 3-2-2 Futabanosato, Hiroshima, Hiroshima 7320057, Japan
[2] Hiroshima Univ, Inst Biomed & Hlth Sci, Dept Radiat Oncol, Higashi Ku, 3-2-2 Futabanosato, Hiroshima, Hiroshima 7320057, Japan
关键词
postoperative breast cancer; regional lymph nodes; hybrid volumetric-modulated arc therapy; homogeneity and conformity; lung irradiation dose; RADIATION-THERAPY; WHOLE-BREAST; RADIOTHERAPY; IMRT; RISK; IRRADIATION; MOTION; 3D-CRT;
D O I
10.1093/jrr/rraa057
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
To improve the homogeneity and conformity of the irradiation dose for postoperative breast cancer including regional lymph nodes, we planned Hybrid volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), which combines conventional tangential field mainly for the chest area and VMAT mainly for the supraclavicular area and marginal zone. In this study, we compared the dosimetric impact between traditional 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) and Hybrid VMAT and observed toxicities following Hybrid VMAT. A total of 70 patients indicated between October 2016 and December 2017 were included. The prescribed dose was 50 Gy/25 fractions. For the dosimetric impact, 3DCRT and Hybrid VMAT plans were compared in each patient with respect to the dosimetric parameters. Toxicities were followed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. The median follow-up duration was 319 days. For the do simetric impact, the h omogeneity index (HI) and conformity index (CI) of PTV were significantly improved in the Hybrid VMAT plan compared with that in the 3DCRT plan (HI, 0.15 +/- 0.07 in Hybrid VMAT vs 0.41 +/- 0.19 in 3DCRT, P < 0.001; CI, 1.61 +/- 0.44 in Hybrid VMAT vs 2.10 +/- 0.56 in 3DCRT, P < 0.001). The mean irradiated ipsilateral lung dose was not significantly different in both plans (12.0 +/- 2.4 Gy in Hybrid VMAT vs 11.8 +/- 2.8 Gy in 3DCRT, P < 0.533). Regarding toxicity, there were no patients who developed >= grade 3 acute toxicity and >= grade 2 pneumonitis during the follow-up. Hybrid VMAT for postoperative breast cancer including regional lymph nodes was a reasonable technique that improved the homogeneity and conformity of the irradiation dose to the planning target volume while keeping the irradiation dose to organs at risk to a minimum.
引用
收藏
页码:747 / 754
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Hybrid-VMAT for Post-Operative Breast Cancer Including Regional Lymph Nodes: The Advantage of Dosimetric Data and Safety of Toxicities
    Doi, Y.
    Nakao, M.
    Miura, H.
    Ozawa, S.
    Kenjo, M.
    Nagata, Y.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2019, 105 (01): : E53 - E53
  • [2] Dosimetric comparison of hybrid volumetric-modulated arc therapy, volumetric-modulated arc therapy, and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for left-sided early breast cancer
    Lin, Jia-Fu
    Yeh, Dah-Cherng
    Yeh, Hui-Ling
    Chang, Chen-Fa
    Lin, Jin-Ching
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2015, 40 (03) : 262 - 267
  • [3] Dosimetric comparison between volumetric-modulated arc therapy and a hybrid volumetric-modulated arc therapy and segmented field-in-field technique for postmastectomy chest wall and regional lymph node irradiation
    Lang, Karen
    Loritz, Brianne
    Schwartz, Adam
    Hunzeker, Ashley
    Lenards, Nishele
    Culp, Lee
    Finley, Randi
    Corbin, Kimberly S.
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2020, 45 (02) : 121 - 127
  • [4] Dosimetric comparison between volumetric-modulated arc therapy and a hybrid volumetric-modulated arc therapy and segmented field-in-field technique for post-mastectomy chest wall and regional lymph node irradiation
    Lang, Karen
    Loritz, Brianne
    Schwartz, Adam
    Hunzeker, Ashley
    Lenards, Nishele
    Culp, Lee
    Finley, Randi
    Corbin, Kimberly S.
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2020, 45 (01) : 108 - 108
  • [5] Dosimetric Advantage of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy in the Treatment of Intraocular Cancer
    Jin, X.
    Deng, Z.
    Xie, C.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06) : 2923 - 2923
  • [6] Dosimetric advantage of volumetric modulated arc therapy in the treatment of intraocular cancer
    Zhenxiang Deng
    Lanxiao Shen
    Xiaomin Zheng
    Yongqiang Zhou
    Jinling Yi
    Ce Han
    Congying Xie
    Xiance Jin
    Radiation Oncology, 12
  • [7] Dosimetric advantage of volumetric modulated arc therapy in the treatment of intraocular cancer
    Deng, Zhenxiang
    Shen, Lanxiao
    Zheng, Xiaomin
    Zhou, Yongqiang
    Yi, Jinling
    Han, Ce
    Xie, Congying
    Jin, Xiance
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2017, 12
  • [8] Dosimetric benefits of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy in the treatment of postoperative cervical cancer patients
    Deng, Xia
    Han, Ce
    Chen, Shan
    Xie, Congying
    Yi, Jinling
    Zhou, Yongqiang
    Zheng, Xiaomin
    Deng, Zhenxiang
    Jin, Xiance
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 18 (01): : 25 - 31
  • [9] Dosimetric Effect on Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy: Single Institutional Experience
    Hashem, Rania
    Mulla, Zaheeda
    Ghassal, Nour
    Bokhary, Ayman
    Howladar, Fatimah
    Fallatah, Kholoud
    Iskandarani, Omar
    Attar, Mohammad
    Ujaimi, Reem
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2021, 10 (02): : 55 - 62
  • [10] Dosimetric comparison of volumetric-modulated arc therapy and helical tomotherapy for adjuvant treatment of bilateral breast cancer
    Phurailatpam, Reena
    Wadasadawala, Tabassum
    Chauhan, Kamalnayan
    Panda, Subhajit
    Sarin, Rajiv
    JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2022, 21 (01) : 36 - 44