Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of the Prostate Image Quality and Geometric Distortion of Readout-Segmented Versus Selective-Excitation Accelerated Acquisitions

被引:35
|
作者
Barth, Borna K. [1 ]
Cornelius, Alexander [2 ]
Nanz, Daniel [1 ]
Eberli, Daniel [3 ]
Donati, Olivio F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich Hosp, Inst Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Cantonal Hosp Aarau, Dept Radiol, Aarau, Switzerland
[3] Univ Zurich Hosp, Dept Urol, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
diffusion-weighted imaging; magnetic resonance imaging; prostate; read out segmented; reduced field of view; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; SINGLE-SHOT; 3; T; CLINICAL-APPLICATION; PEDIATRIC BRAIN; GLEASON SCORE; MR; CANCER; EPI; COEFFICIENT;
D O I
10.1097/RLI.0000000000000184
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective To compare image quality and geometric distortion between readout-segmented diffusion-weighted imaging (rs-DWI) and selective-excitation accelerated reduced-field of view (FOV) DWI (sTX-DWI) of the prostate. Materials and Methods Sixty-five patients underwent 3-T MRI of the prostate including rs-DWI and sTX-DWI (b values, 0, 50, and 1000 seconds/mm(2); FOV, 150 x 150 mm(2) and 77 x150 mm(2) for rs-DWI and sTX-DWI; slice thickness, 3 mm; acquisition time, 8:18 min and 1:37 min for rs-DWI and sTX-DWI). Two readers evaluated aspects of image quality and geometric distortion on a 5-point Likert scale. Quantitative analysis of geometric distortion was assessed by measurements of anteroposterior and left-right diameters and compared to T2-weighted turbo-spin echo sequence using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results There was no significant difference in resolution, capsule demarcation, and zonal anatomy (P = 0.111-0.866). Overall image quality was rated above average by reader 1 (4.09 0.66 and 4.03 0.79; P = 0.433) and reader 2 (3.86 +/- 0.66 and 3.80 +/- 0.74; P = 0.465) for rs-DWI and sTX-DWI. Reader 1 (0.74 +/- 0.67 and 1.17 +/- 0.84; P < 0.001) and reader 2 (0.55 +/- 0.64 and 1.09 +/- 0.95; P < 0.001) rated the level of geometric distortion significantly lower for rs-DWI than sTX-DWI. Readout-segmented DWI (0.9 +/- 2.2 mm) and sTX-DWI (2.1 +/- 3.8 mm) overestimated the anteroposterior diameter of the prostate compared to T2-weighted turbo-spin echo sequence (P < 0.001), the difference being more pronounced for sTX-DWI [ICC, 0.89 (95% confidence interval, 0.83-0.93)] compared to rs-DWI [ICC, 0.96 (95% confidence interval, 0.94-0.96)]. Conclusion Selective-excitation accelerated reduced-FOV DW images (sTX-DWI) of the prostate can be acquired more than 5 times faster than rs-DWI with comparable image quality, at the expense of significantly increased geometric distortion.
引用
收藏
页码:785 / 791
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Detection of brain lesions at the skull base using diffusion-weighted imaging with readout-segmented echo-planar imaging and generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions
    Wei, Xiao-Er
    Li, Wen-Bin
    Li, Ming-Hua
    Li, Yue-Hua
    Wang, Dan
    Zhang, Yu-Zhen
    Jin, Li-Xin
    NEUROLOGY INDIA, 2011, 59 (06) : 839 - 843
  • [22] Readout-segmented Echo-planar Imaging for Diffusion-weighted Imaging in the Pelvis at 3T-A Feasibility Study
    Thian, Yee Liang
    Xie, Wanying
    Porter, David A.
    Ang, Bertrand Weileng
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2014, 21 (04) : 531 - 537
  • [23] Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging in Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging in Breast Cancer: Comparison with Single-Shot Echo-Planar Imaging in Image Quality
    Kim, Yun Ju
    Kim, Sung Hun
    Kang, Bong Joo
    Park, Chang Suk
    Kim, Hyeon Sook
    Son, Yo Han
    Porter, David Andrew
    Song, Byung Joo
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2014, 15 (04) : 403 - 410
  • [24] Readout-Segmented Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in a Critical Anatomic Area - Diagnosing Posterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy (PION)
    Daeubler, B. F.
    Kamli, A.
    Runge, V. M.
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2014, 186 (12): : 1152 - 1153
  • [25] Clinical evaluation of single-shot and readout-segmented diffusion-weighted imaging in stroke patients at 3 T
    Morelli, John
    Porter, David
    Ai, Fei
    Gerdes, Clint
    Saettele, Megan
    Feiweier, Thorsten
    Padua, Abraham
    Dix, James
    Marra, Michael
    Rangaswamy, Rajesh
    Runge, Val
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2013, 54 (03) : 299 - 306
  • [26] Improved Readout-Segmented Echo-Planner Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Using Simultaneous Multislice Acquisitions at 3 T
    Li, Qiao
    Jiang, TingTing
    Wang, TingTing
    Huang, Yan
    Hu, XiaoXin
    Zhang, Ling
    Liu, Wei
    Fu, CaiXia
    Gu, YaJia
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2022, 46 (05) : 815 - 822
  • [27] Comparison of Diagnostic Performance and Image Quality between Topup-Corrected and Standard Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Cholesteatoma Diagnostics
    Wiesmueller, Marco
    Wuest, Wolfgang
    Mennecke, Angelika
    May, Matthias Stefan
    Heiss, Rafael
    Fuehres, Tobit
    Janka, Rolf
    Uder, Michael
    Doerfler, Arnd
    Laun, Frederik Bernd
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (07)
  • [28] Simultaneous Multislice Readout-Segmented Echo Planar Imaging for Diffusion-Weighted MRI in Patients With Invasive Breast Cancers
    Song, Sung Eun
    Woo, Ok Hee
    Cho, Kyu Ran
    Seo, Bo Kyoung
    Son, Yo Han
    Grimm, Robert
    Liu, Wei
    Moon, Woo Kyung
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2021, 53 (04) : 1108 - 1115
  • [29] Diffusion-Weighted Imaging-guided MR Spectroscopy in Breast Lesions using Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging
    Sun, Kun
    Chai, Weimin
    Fu, Caixia
    Zhan, Ying
    Shen, Kunwei
    Luo, Xianfu
    Yan, Fuhua
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2016, 26 (06) : 1565 - 1574
  • [30] Bilateral Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging of Breast Tumors with Submillimeter Resolution Using Readout-segmented Echoplanar Imaging at 7 T
    Bogner, Wolfgang
    Pinker, Katja
    Zaric, Olgica
    Baltzer, Pascal
    Minarikova, Lenka
    Porter, David
    Bago-Horvath, Zsuzsanna
    Dubsky, Peter
    Helbich, Thomas H.
    Trattnig, Siegfried
    Gruber, Stephan
    RADIOLOGY, 2015, 274 (01) : 74 - 84