Validation of the A&D wrist-cuff UB-511 (UB-512) device for self-measurement of blood pressure

被引:4
|
作者
Angeli, Fabio [1 ]
Sardone, Mariagrazia [1 ]
Angeli, Enrica [1 ]
Repaci, Salvatore [1 ]
Gattobigio, Roberto [1 ]
Verdecchia, Paolo [1 ]
机构
[1] R Silvestrini Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Clin Res Unit Prevent Cardiol, I-06156 Perugia, Italy
关键词
hypertension; home blood pressure measurement; wrist; validation; device;
D O I
10.1097/01.mbp.0000217995.12215.f2
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Objectives To determine the accuracy of the A&D UB-511 (UB-512) oscillometric wrist-cuff device for self-measurement of blood pressure, the only difference between the two devices being the size of storage memory. Methods Device evaluation was performed according to the modified British Hypertension Society protocol released in 1993. Eighty-five study participants with characteristics outlined in the British Hypertension Society protocol were recruited among those attending our out-patient clinic. The device was evaluated according to the various steps of the protocol. The non-dominant arm was used for blood pressure measurement. To maintain the wrist at cardiac level during validation, the arm was kept horizontal at the mid-sternum level and supported by a soft table. The wrist was kept extended. Sequential readings were taken for the main validation test. Outcome was classified according to the criteria of the British Hypertension Society recommendations, which are based on four strata of accuracy differing from the mercury standard by 5, 10 and 15 mmHg, or more. Results The device achieved a British Hypertension Society grade B for systolic and a grade B for diastolic blood pressure. The device tended to overestimate arm blood pressure, the mean difference (+/- 1 SD) between device and observers being 4.3 +/- 8.7 mmHg for systolic blood pressure and 3.7 +/- 8.1 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure for observer 2, and 4.4 +/- 8.6 mmHg for systolic blood pressure and 3.8 +/- 7.9 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure for observer 1. In a logistic regression analysis, age Was the sole predictor of an achieved difference between device and mercury column by 5 mmHg or less (hazard ratio 1.020; 95% confidence interval 1.003-1.04; P= 0.024). Conclusions These data show that the A&D UB-511 (UB-512) device satisfies the British Hypertension Society recommendations with a grade B/B. The device tends to overestimate cuff blood pressure and its accuracy increases with age.
引用
收藏
页码:349 / 354
页数:6
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [21] Validation of the A&D UM-101 professional device for office blood pressure measurement according to the international protocol
    Stergiou, G.
    Giovas, P.
    Gkinos, C.
    Tzamouranis, D.
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2007, 25 : S164 - S164
  • [22] Validation of the Stabil-O-Graph® blood pressure self-measurement device according to bhs and esh criteria
    Westhoff, T.
    Schmidt, S.
    Zidek, W.
    van der Giet, M.
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2007, 25 : S161 - S161
  • [23] Validation of the A&D UM-101 professional hybrid device for office blood pressure measurement according to the International Protocol
    Stergiou, George S.
    Giovas, Periklis P.
    Gkinos, Charilaos P.
    Tzamouranis, Dimitris G.
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2008, 13 (01) : 37 - 42
  • [24] An Automated Blood Pressure Display for Self-Measurement in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease (iHealth Track): Device Validation Study
    Mazoteras-Pardo, Victoria
    Becerro-De-Bengoa-Vallejo, Ricardo
    Elena Losa-Iglesias, Marta
    Lopez-Lopez, Daniel
    Calvo-Lobo, Cesar
    Rodriguez-Sanz, David
    Maria Martinez-Jimenez, Eva
    Palomo-Lopez, Patricia
    JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2020, 8 (04):
  • [25] Measurement of blood pressure using the auscultatory and oscillometric methods in the same cuff deflation: validation and field trial of the A&D TM2421 monitor
    B Keavney
    R Bird
    A Caiazza
    B Casadei
    J Conway
    Journal of Human Hypertension, 2000, 14 : 573 - 579
  • [26] Measurement of blood pressure using the auscultatory and oscillometric methods in the same cuff deflation: validation and field trial of the A&D TM2421 monitor
    Keavney, B
    Bird, R
    Caiazza, A
    Casadei, B
    Conway, J
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION, 2000, 14 (09) : 573 - 579
  • [27] Validation of the HEM-780REL with easy wrap cuff for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol
    Viera, Anthony J.
    Hinderliter, Alan L.
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2007, 12 (05) : 335 - 338
  • [28] Validation of the A&D BP UA-651 device with a wide-range cuff for home blood pressure measurement according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010
    Benetti, Elisabetta
    Fania, Claudio
    Palatini, Paolo
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2015, 20 (03) : 164 - 167
  • [29] Validation of the iHealth BP7 wrist blood pressure monitor, for self-measurement, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010
    Wang, Qing
    Zhao, Huadong
    Chen, Wan
    Li, Ni
    Wan, Yi
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2014, 19 (01) : 54 - 57
  • [30] Validation of the A&D UM-211 device for office blood pressure measurement according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010
    Fania, Claudio
    Albertini, Federica
    Palatini, Paolo
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2017, 22 (05) : 302 - 305