Minimizing Pedicle Screw Pullout Risks A Detailed Biomechanical Analysis of Screw Design and Placement

被引:80
|
作者
Bianco, Rohan-Jean [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Arnoux, Pierre-Jean [3 ]
Wagnac, Eric [1 ,3 ]
Mac-Thiong, Jean-Marc [2 ,4 ,5 ]
Aubin, Carl-Eric [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Polytech Montreal, Dept Mech Engn, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] Sainte Justine Univ Hosp Ctr, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Univ Aix Marseille 1, Lab Biomcca Appl, UMRT24 IFSTTAR, Marseille, France
[4] Univ Montreal, Dept Surg, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[5] Hop Sacre Coeur, Dept Surg, Montreal, PQ, Canada
来源
CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY | 2017年 / 30卷 / 03期
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
finite element analysis; pedicle screw; pullout test; spinal instrumentation; FINITE-ELEMENT MODEL; INSERTIONAL TORQUE; FIXATION; BONE; INSTRUMENTATION; CALIBRATION; SCOLIOSIS; STRENGTH; FAILURE; TESTS;
D O I
10.1097/BSD.0000000000000151
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: Detailed biomechanical analysis of the anchorage performance provided by different pedicle screw designs and placement strategies under pullout loading. Objective: To biomechanically characterize the specific effects of surgeon-specific pedicle screw design parameters on anchorage performance using a finite element model. Summary of Background Data: Pedicle screw fixation is commonly used in the treatment of spinal pathologies. However, there is little consensus on the selection of an optimal screw type, size, and insertion trajectory depending on vertebra dimension and shape. Methods: Different screw diameters and lengths, threads, and insertion trajectories were computationally tested using a design of experiment approach. A detailed finite element model of an L3 vertebra was created including elastoplastic bone properties and contact interactions with the screws. Loads and boundary conditions were applied to the screws to simulate axial pullout tests. Force-displacement responses and internal stresses were analyzed to determine the specific effects of each parameter. Results: The design of experiment analysis revealed significant effects (P<0.01) for all tested principal parameters along with the interactions between diameter and trajectory. Screw diameter had the greatest impact on anchorage performance. The best insertion trajectory to resist pullout involved placing the screw threads closer to the pedicle walls using the straightforward insertion technique, which showed the importance of the cortical layer grip. The simulated cylindrical single-lead thread screws presented better biomechanical anchorage than the conical dual-lead thread screws in axial loading conditions. Conclusions: The model made it possible to quantitatively measure the effects of both screw design characteristics and surgical choices, enabling to recommend strategies to improve single pedicle screw performance under axial loading.
引用
收藏
页码:E226 / E232
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Biomechanical analysis of pedicle screw pullout strength
    Bianco, R-J.
    Arnoux, P-J.
    Mac-Thiong, J-M.
    Wagnac, E.
    Aubin, C-E.
    COMPUTER METHODS IN BIOMECHANICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 16 : 246 - 248
  • [2] Biomechanical analysis of pedicle screw placement: a feasibility study
    Wagnac, Eric
    Michardiere, Denis
    Garo, Anais
    Arnoux, Pierre-Jean
    Mac-Thiong, Jean-Marc
    Aubin, Carl-Eric
    RESEARCH INTO SPINAL DEFORMITIES 7, 2010, 158 : 167 - 171
  • [3] Pedicle screw placement in the lumbar spine: effect of trajectory and screw design on acute biomechanical purchase
    Wray, Steven
    Mimran, Ronnie
    Vadapalli, Sasidhar
    Shetye, Snehal S.
    McGilvray, Kirk C.
    Puttlitz, Christian M.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2015, 22 (05) : 503 - 510
  • [4] Biomechanical Pullout Strength and Stability of the Cervical Artificial Pedicle Screw
    Barnes, Alison H.
    Eguizabal, Johnny A.
    Acosta, Frank L., Jr.
    Lotz, Jeffrey C.
    Buckley, Jenni M.
    Ames, Christopher P.
    SPINE, 2009, 34 (01) : E16 - E20
  • [5] The biomechanical effect of pedicle screw hubbing on pullout resistance in the thoracic spine
    Paik, Haines
    Dmitriev, Anton E.
    Lehman, Ronald A., Jr.
    Gaume, Rachel E.
    Ambati, Divya V.
    Kang, Daniel G.
    Lenke, Lawrence G.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2012, 12 (05): : 417 - 424
  • [6] Screw Pullout Strength After Pedicle Screw Reposition: A Finite Element Analysis
    Ye, Yu-Xing
    Huang, Da-Geng
    Hao, Ding-Jun
    Liu, Jia-Yuan
    Ji, Jia-Jia
    Guo, Jin-Niu
    SPINE, 2023, 48 (22) : E382 - E388
  • [7] Biomechanical design and analysis of auxetic pedicle screw to resist loosening
    Yao, Yan
    Yuan, Hao
    Huang, Huiwen
    Liu, Jinglong
    Wang, Lizhen
    Fan, Yubo
    COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2021, 133
  • [8] Design and biomechanical study of a modified pedicle screw
    刘涛
    郑文杰
    李长青
    刘国栋
    周跃
    中华创伤杂志(英文版), 2010, (04)
  • [9] Design and biomechanical study of a modified pedicle screw
    Liu Tao
    Zheng Wen-jie
    Li Chang-qing
    Liu Guo-dong
    Zhou Yue
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF TRAUMATOLOGY, 2010, 13 (04) : 222 - 228
  • [10] Pedicle screw pullout strength, screw diameter, and possible complications
    Miller, Aaron
    Griepp, Daniel W.
    Murthy, Saikiran
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2023, 38 (06) : 767 - 767