Useful island block geometries of a passive intensity modulator used for intensity-modulated bolus electron conformal therapy

被引:4
|
作者
Chambers, Erin L. [1 ]
Carver, Robert L. [1 ,2 ]
Hogstrom, Kenneth R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Louisiana State Univ, Dept Phys & Astron, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
[2] Mary Bird Perkins Canc Ctr, Baton Rouge, LA 70809 USA
来源
关键词
electron therapy; intensity modulation; bolus; conformal therapy; BEAM REDEFINITION ALGORITHM; DOSE CALCULATIONS; DESIGN; POSTMASTECTOMY; DOSIMETRY;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.13079
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose This project determined the range of island block geometric configurations useful for the clinical utilization of intensity-modulated bolus electron conformal therapy (IM-BECT). Methods Multiple half-beam island block geometries were studied for seven electron energies 7-20 MeV at 100 and 103 cm source-to-surface distance (SSD). We studied relative fluence distributions at 0.5 cm and 2.0 cm depths in water, resulting in 28 unique beam conditions. For each beam condition, we studied intensity reduction factor (IRF) values of 0.70, 0.75, 0.80, 0.85, 0.90, and 0.95, and hexagonal packing separations for the island blocks of 0.50, 0.75, 1.00, 1.25, and 1.50 cm, that is, 30 unique IM configurations and 840 unique beam-IM combinations. A combination was deemed acceptable if the average intensity downstream of the intensity modulator agreed within 2% of that intended and the variation in fluence was less than +/- 2%. Results For 100 cm SSD, and for 0.5 cm depth, results showed that beam energies above 13 MeV did not exhibit sufficient scatter to produce clinically acceptable fluence (intensity) distributions for all IRF values (0.70-0.95). In particular, 20 MeV fluence distributions were unacceptable for any values, and acceptable 16 MeV fluence distributions were limited to a minimum IRF of 0.85. For the 2.0 cm depth, beam energies up to and including 20 MeV had acceptable fluence distributions. For 103 cm SSD and for 0.5 cm and 2.0 cm depths, results showed that all beam energies (7-20 MeV) had clinically acceptable fluence distributions for all IRF values (0.70-0.95). In general, the more clinically likely 103 cm SSD had acceptable fluence distributions with larger separations (r), which allow larger block diameters. Conclusion The geometric operating range of island block separations and IRF values (block diameters) producing clinically appropriate IM electron beams has been determined.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 145
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Modeling scatter through sides of island blocks used for intensity-modulated bolus electron conformal therapy
    Scotto, Joseph G.
    Pitcher, Garrett M.
    Carver, Robert L.
    Erhart, Kevin J.
    McGuffey, Andrew S.
    Hogstrom, Kenneth R.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 24 (02):
  • [2] Planning and delivery of intensity modulated bolus electron conformal therapy
    Hilliard, Elizabeth N.
    Carver, Robert L.
    Chambers, Erin L.
    Kavanaugh, James A.
    Erhart, Kevin J.
    McGuffey, Andrew S.
    Hogstrom, Kenneth R.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 22 (10): : 8 - 21
  • [3] Use of Passive Intensity Modulation for Bolus Electron Conformal Therapy
    Carver, R.
    Chambers, E.
    Hilliard, E.
    Erhart, K.
    Hogstrom, K.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (06) : E624 - E624
  • [4] Potential clinical efficacy of intensity-modulated conformal therapy
    Meeks, SL
    Buatti, JM
    Bova, FJ
    Friedman, WA
    Mendenhall, WM
    Zlotecki, RA
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1998, 40 (02): : 483 - 495
  • [5] Dosimetric validation of intensity-modulated bolus electron conformal therapy planning and delivery using an anthropomorphic cylindrical head phantom
    McGuffey, Andrew S.
    Pitcher, Garrett M.
    Erhart, Kevin J.
    Hogstrom, Kenneth R.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 25 (07):
  • [6] On compensator design for photon beam intensity-modulated conformal therapy
    Jiang, SB
    Ayyangar, KM
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1998, 25 (05) : 668 - 675
  • [7] Delivery confirmation of bolus electron conformal therapy combined with intensity modulated x-ray therapy
    Kavanaugh, James A.
    Hogstrom, Kenneth R.
    Chu, Connel
    Carver, Robert A.
    Fontenot, Jonas P.
    Henkelmann, Gregory
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (02)
  • [8] Managing geometric uncertainty in conformal intensity-modulated radiation therapy
    Jaffray, DA
    Yan, D
    Wong, JW
    SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 1999, 9 (01) : 4 - 19
  • [9] A COMPARISON OF HELICAL INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY, INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY, AND 3D-CONFORMAL RADIATION THERAPY FOR PANCREATIC CANCER
    Poppe, Matthew M.
    Narra, Venkat
    Yue, Ning J.
    Zhou, Jinghao
    Nelson, Carl
    Jabbour, Salma K.
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2011, 36 (04) : 351 - 357
  • [10] Evaluation of a Modified Pencil Beam Algorithm Dose Calculation in the Presence of Intensity Modulators for Intensity Modulated Bolus Electron Beam Conformal Therapy
    Hilliard, E.
    Carver, R.
    Hogstrom, K.
    Erhart, K.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (06) : E230 - E231