The influence of infection on survival and successful transplantation in patients with left ventricular assist devices

被引:0
|
作者
Argenziano, M [1 ]
Catanese, KA [1 ]
Moazami, N [1 ]
Gardocki, MT [1 ]
Weinberg, AD [1 ]
Clavenna, MW [1 ]
Rose, EA [1 ]
Scully, BE [1 ]
Levin, HR [1 ]
Oz, MC [1 ]
机构
[1] COLUMBIA UNIV COLL PHYS & SURG,DIV CARDIOTHORAC SURG,NEW YORK,NY 10032
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Mechanical cardiac assistance has recently emerged as a tenable option in the treatment of end-stage heart failure. In spite of recent technical improvements that have reduced the incidence of life-threatening complications, the reported frequency of infections in these patients has remained high. Methods: Over a 5-year period, 60 patients underwent insertion of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) at our institution. Detailed medical records were kept prospectively for all patients, and a variety of endpoints were analyzed, including the incidence, nature, and sequelae of infections before and after LVAD implantation and after transplantation. Results: Twenty-nine of 60 patients (48%) undergoing LVAD insertion subsequently had development of infections. The most frequent sites of infection were blood, LVAD drivelines, and central venous catheters, representing 61% of all infections. At the time of LVAD implantation, 13 of 60 patients (22%) had culture-proven infections. In spite of an increased incidence of subsequent infection (77% vs 40%), there were no differences in rates of mortality (31% vs 26%), LVAD endocarditis, (23% vs 11%) and eventual transplantation (62% vs 57%) between these patients and those without periimplantation infections. Although the overall mortality rate was not influenced by infections during LVAD support (28% vs 26%), the development of LVAD endocarditis was associated with a high mortality rate. Finally, although patients with infections during LVAD support had significantly longer median support times than those who remained infection free (101 vs 49 days, respectively), there was no difference in the rate of successful transplantation (59% vs 58%) or in the rate of infection after transplantation (35% vs 28%). Conclusions: Infections are common in patients undergoing LVAD support, but they do not adversely affect survival, the rate of successful transplantation, or the incidence of posttransplantation infection. Periimplantation infections may increase the risk of subsequent infections, but they also do not influence survival or transplantability. Patients with development of LVAD endocarditis are at increased risk for morbidity and death and require early and aggressive therapy, potentially including device explantation.
引用
收藏
页码:822 / 831
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Ambulatory care of patients with left ventricular assist devices
    Schmid, C
    Hammel, D
    Deng, MC
    Weyand, M
    Baba, H
    Tjan, TDT
    Drees, G
    Roeder, N
    Schmidt, C
    Scheld, HH
    CIRCULATION, 1999, 100 (19) : 224 - 228
  • [32] Global Outcome in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices
    Fendler, Timothy J.
    Nassif, Michael E.
    Kennedy, Kevin F.
    Joseph, Susan M.
    Silvestry, Scott C.
    Ewald, Gregory A.
    LaRue, Shane J.
    Vader, Justin M.
    Spertus, John A.
    Arnold, Suzanne V.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 119 (07): : 1069 - 1073
  • [33] Noncardiac surgery in patients with left ventricular assist devices
    Schmid, C
    Wilhelm, M
    Dietl, KH
    Schmidt, C
    Hammel, D
    Scheld, H
    SURGERY, 2001, 129 (04) : 440 - 444
  • [34] Perioperative pharmacotherapy in patients with left ventricular assist devices
    Dang, NC
    Naka, Y
    DRUGS & AGING, 2004, 21 (15) : 993 - 1012
  • [35] Neurologic Complications in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices
    Shoskes, Aaron
    Fan, Tracey H.
    Starling, Randall C.
    Cho, Sung-Min
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 39 (02) : 210 - 221
  • [36] Microcirculatory Coherence in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices
    Deitchman, Andrew R.
    McCurdy, Michael T.
    Fargaly, Hithem
    Gilani, Muhammad
    Sorensen, Erik N.
    Mazzeffi, Michael A.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2019, 33 (09) : 2608 - 2610
  • [37] Readmission Rates in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices
    Nativi-Nicolau, J.
    Healy, A.
    Abdelrahman, S.
    Jaramillo, J.
    Elmer, A.
    Tagge, S.
    McKellar, S.
    Stehlik, J.
    Drakos, S.
    Fang, J.
    Gilbert, E. M.
    Wever-Pinzon, O.
    Kawamoto, K.
    Selzman, C.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 35 (04): : S335 - S335
  • [38] Microembolic signals in patients with left ventricular assist devices
    Roberts, JK
    Mohr, JP
    Moazami, N
    Oz, MC
    STROKE, 1996, 27 (10) : 1915 - 1916
  • [39] Perioperative Pharmacotherapy in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices
    Nicholas C. Dang
    Yoshifumi Naka
    Drugs & Aging, 2004, 21 : 993 - 1012
  • [40] Ophthalmic Surgery in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices
    Dumas, George A.
    Bryant, Ayesha S.
    Boyd, Gwendolyn L.
    CASE REPORTS IN OPHTHALMOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2019, 2019