The influence of infection on survival and successful transplantation in patients with left ventricular assist devices

被引:0
|
作者
Argenziano, M [1 ]
Catanese, KA [1 ]
Moazami, N [1 ]
Gardocki, MT [1 ]
Weinberg, AD [1 ]
Clavenna, MW [1 ]
Rose, EA [1 ]
Scully, BE [1 ]
Levin, HR [1 ]
Oz, MC [1 ]
机构
[1] COLUMBIA UNIV COLL PHYS & SURG,DIV CARDIOTHORAC SURG,NEW YORK,NY 10032
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Mechanical cardiac assistance has recently emerged as a tenable option in the treatment of end-stage heart failure. In spite of recent technical improvements that have reduced the incidence of life-threatening complications, the reported frequency of infections in these patients has remained high. Methods: Over a 5-year period, 60 patients underwent insertion of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) at our institution. Detailed medical records were kept prospectively for all patients, and a variety of endpoints were analyzed, including the incidence, nature, and sequelae of infections before and after LVAD implantation and after transplantation. Results: Twenty-nine of 60 patients (48%) undergoing LVAD insertion subsequently had development of infections. The most frequent sites of infection were blood, LVAD drivelines, and central venous catheters, representing 61% of all infections. At the time of LVAD implantation, 13 of 60 patients (22%) had culture-proven infections. In spite of an increased incidence of subsequent infection (77% vs 40%), there were no differences in rates of mortality (31% vs 26%), LVAD endocarditis, (23% vs 11%) and eventual transplantation (62% vs 57%) between these patients and those without periimplantation infections. Although the overall mortality rate was not influenced by infections during LVAD support (28% vs 26%), the development of LVAD endocarditis was associated with a high mortality rate. Finally, although patients with infections during LVAD support had significantly longer median support times than those who remained infection free (101 vs 49 days, respectively), there was no difference in the rate of successful transplantation (59% vs 58%) or in the rate of infection after transplantation (35% vs 28%). Conclusions: Infections are common in patients undergoing LVAD support, but they do not adversely affect survival, the rate of successful transplantation, or the incidence of posttransplantation infection. Periimplantation infections may increase the risk of subsequent infections, but they also do not influence survival or transplantability. Patients with development of LVAD endocarditis are at increased risk for morbidity and death and require early and aggressive therapy, potentially including device explantation.
引用
收藏
页码:822 / 831
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Emergency use of wearable left ventricular assist devices in patients not eligible for heart transplantation
    Forni, A.
    Faggian, G.
    Chiominto, B.
    Innocente, F.
    Ferrara, A.
    Iafrancesco, M.
    Mazzucco, A.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 40 (06) : 1993 - 1995
  • [22] Left ventricular assist devices provide renal protection in patients awaiting heart transplantation
    Ennis, S. C.
    Moukarbel, G. V.
    MacGillivray, T. E.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2008, 27 (02): : S62 - S62
  • [23] Impact of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators on Survival of Patients with Centrifugal Left Ventricular Assist Devices
    Lee, William
    Tay, Andre
    Subbiah, Rajesh N.
    Walker, Bruce D.
    Kuchar, Dennis L.
    Muthiah, Kavitha
    Macdonald, Peter S.
    Keogh, Anne M.
    Kotlyar, Eugene
    Jabbour, Andrew
    Spratt, Philip
    Jansz, Paul C.
    Granger, Emily
    Dhital, Kumud
    Hayward, Christopher S.
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2015, 38 (08): : 925 - 933
  • [24] Left Ventricular Assist Devices in Patients with Transposition of the Great Arteries: Survival and Adverse Events
    Sekhon, Shaundeep
    Michel, Eriberto
    Wu, Tingqing
    Harap, Rebecca
    Ahmad, Faraz S.
    Ghafourian, Kambiz
    Monge, Michael
    Pawale, Amit
    Pham, Duc T.
    Tibrewala, Anjan
    Rich, Jonathan D.
    Vorovich, Esther
    Wilcox, Jane
    Youmans, Quentin R.
    Yancy, Clyde W.
    Okwuosa, Ike S.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2020, 26 (10) : S154 - S154
  • [25] Left Ventricular Assist Devices
    Grady, Kathleen L.
    HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2015, 34 (10) : 1798 - 1798
  • [26] Left ventricular assist devices
    Birks, E. J.
    HEART, 2010, 96 (01) : 63 - 71
  • [27] Obesity Is Associated with Driveline Infection of Left Ventricular Assist Devices
    Akay, Mehmet H.
    Nathan, Sriram S.
    Radovancevic, Rajko
    Poglajen, Gregor
    Jezovnik, Mateja K.
    Candelaria, Isabella N.
    Averill, Barbara L.
    Patel, Manish K.
    Kar, Biswajit
    Gregoric, Igor D.
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 2019, 65 (07) : 678 - 682
  • [28] Left ventricular assist devices
    Gwyn, Jennifer C., V
    JOURNAL OF THE INTENSIVE CARE SOCIETY, 2020, 21 (04) : 355 - 358
  • [29] Successful Cold Atmospheric Plasma Therapy of Driveline Infections in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices
    Hilker, L.
    Sommer, K.
    von Woedtke, T.
    Weltmann, K.
    Kaminski, A.
    Reichenspurner, H.
    Barten, M.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2022, 41 (04): : S489 - S490
  • [30] Oncostatin M: a Potential Biomarker to Predict Infection in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices
    Setiadi, Hendra
    El-Banayosy, Ahmed M.
    George, Susan
    Schmidtke, David W.
    El-Banayosy, Aly
    Horstmanshof, Douglas A.
    Long, James W.
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 2022, 68 (08) : 1036 - 1043