Clinical Next-Generation Sequencing for Precision Oncology in Rare Cancers

被引:27
|
作者
Groisberg, Roman [1 ,2 ]
Hong, David S. [1 ]
Roszik, Jason [3 ]
Janku, Filip [1 ]
Tsimberidou, Apostolia M. [1 ]
Javle, Milind [4 ]
Meric-Bernstam, Funda [1 ]
Subbiah, Vivek [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Invest Canc Therapeut, Phase Program 1, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Div Canc Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Melanoma Med Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Gastrointestinal Med Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
CELL LUNG-CANCER; OPEN-LABEL; TARGETED THERAPY; MULTICENTER; DABRAFENIB; TRAMETINIB; LANDSCAPE; GENOMICS;
D O I
10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-17-1107
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The European Society for Medical Oncology defines rare cancers as 5 or fewer cases per 100,000 persons per year. For many rare cancers, no standard of care exists, and treatment is often extrapolated. Identifying potentially targetable genomic alterations in rare tumors is a rational approach to improving treatment options. We sought to catalog these mutations in rare tumors and to assess their clinical utility. For this retrospective analysis, we selected rare tumor patients from a dataset of patients who underwent clinical tumor genomic profiling. Sarcomas were excluded. To index potentially actionable alterations, patients' reports were reviewed for mutations in cancer-associated genes and pathways. Respective clinical records were abstracted to appraise the benefit of using a targeted therapy approach. Actionable alterations were defined as targeted by a drug available on-label, off-label, or in clinical trials. The 95 patients analyzed had 40 different tumor subtypes, most common being adenoid cystic (13%), cholangiocarcinoma (7%), and metaplastic breast (6%). At least one genomic alteration was identified in 87 patients (92%). The most common identifiable mutations were in TP53 (23%), KRAS (10%), PIK3CA (9%), CDKN2A/B (8%), BRAF (7%), MLL (7%), and ARID1A (6%). Thirty-six patients (38%) with 21 different tumors had at least one potentially actionable alteration. Thirteen patients received targeted therapy. Of these, 4 had a partial response, 6 had stable disease, and 3 had progressive disease as the best response. The addition of genomic profiling to management of rare cancers adds a potential line of therapy for cancers that have little or no standard of care. In our analysis, tumors with a BRAF alteration responded well to BRAF inhibitors. Mol Cancer Ther; 17(7); 1595-601. (C) 2018 AACR.
引用
收藏
页码:1595 / 1601
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Next-generation sequencing in clinical microbiology
    Wain, John
    Mavrogiorgou, Eleni
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2013, 13 (03) : 225 - 227
  • [32] The Uncertainties of Clinical Next-Generation Sequencing
    Pasic, Maria D.
    [J]. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2018, 64 (03) : 616 - 617
  • [33] CLINICAL APPLICATIONS OF NEXT-GENERATION SEQUENCING
    Gloria Rebollar-Vega, Rosa
    Arriaga-Canon, Cristian
    Alberto de la Rosa-Velazquez, Inti
    [J]. REVISTA DE INVESTIGACION CLINICA-CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL INVESTIGATION, 2018, 70 (04): : 153 - 157
  • [34] Next-Generation Sequencing for Clinical Diagnostics
    Jacob, Howard J.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2013, 369 (16): : 1557 - 1558
  • [35] Technical and implementation issues in using next-generation sequencing of cancers in clinical practice
    D Ulahannan
    M B Kovac
    P J Mulholland
    J-B Cazier
    I Tomlinson
    [J]. British Journal of Cancer, 2013, 109 : 827 - 835
  • [36] Performance characteristics of next-generation sequencing in clinical mutation detection of colorectal cancers
    Haley, Lisa
    Tseng, Li-Hui
    Zheng, Gang
    Dudley, Jonathan
    Anderson, Derek A.
    Azad, Nilofer S.
    Gocke, Christopher D.
    Eshleman, James R.
    Lin, Ming-Tseh
    [J]. MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2015, 28 (10) : 1390 - 1399
  • [37] Technical and implementation issues in using next-generation sequencing of cancers in clinical practice
    Ulahannan, D.
    Kovac, M. B.
    Mulholland, P. J.
    Cazier, J-B
    Tomlinson, I.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 109 (04) : 827 - 835
  • [38] Results and clinical utilization of next-generation tumor sequencing in gynecologic oncology patients
    Watson, C. H.
    Spinosa, D.
    Wong, J.
    Strickland, K. C.
    Berchuck, A.
    Previs, R. A.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2020, 159 : 290 - 291
  • [39] CLINICAL UTILITY, COVERAGE, AND REIMBURSEMENT FOR NEXT-GENERATION SEQUENCING IN PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY PRACTICE
    Oberg, J. A.
    Sireci, A. N.
    Hsiao, S. J.
    Pendrick, D.
    Turk, A. T.
    Chung, W. K.
    Mansukhani, M. M.
    Sulis, M. L.
    Kung, A. L.
    Bender, Glade J. L.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (05) : A114 - A114
  • [40] Application of next-generation sequencing in clinical oncology to advance personalized treatment of cancer
    Yan-Fang Guan
    [J]. 癌症, 2012, 31 (10) : 463 - 470