Clinical Next-Generation Sequencing for Precision Oncology in Rare Cancers

被引:27
|
作者
Groisberg, Roman [1 ,2 ]
Hong, David S. [1 ]
Roszik, Jason [3 ]
Janku, Filip [1 ]
Tsimberidou, Apostolia M. [1 ]
Javle, Milind [4 ]
Meric-Bernstam, Funda [1 ]
Subbiah, Vivek [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Invest Canc Therapeut, Phase Program 1, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Div Canc Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Melanoma Med Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Gastrointestinal Med Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
CELL LUNG-CANCER; OPEN-LABEL; TARGETED THERAPY; MULTICENTER; DABRAFENIB; TRAMETINIB; LANDSCAPE; GENOMICS;
D O I
10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-17-1107
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The European Society for Medical Oncology defines rare cancers as 5 or fewer cases per 100,000 persons per year. For many rare cancers, no standard of care exists, and treatment is often extrapolated. Identifying potentially targetable genomic alterations in rare tumors is a rational approach to improving treatment options. We sought to catalog these mutations in rare tumors and to assess their clinical utility. For this retrospective analysis, we selected rare tumor patients from a dataset of patients who underwent clinical tumor genomic profiling. Sarcomas were excluded. To index potentially actionable alterations, patients' reports were reviewed for mutations in cancer-associated genes and pathways. Respective clinical records were abstracted to appraise the benefit of using a targeted therapy approach. Actionable alterations were defined as targeted by a drug available on-label, off-label, or in clinical trials. The 95 patients analyzed had 40 different tumor subtypes, most common being adenoid cystic (13%), cholangiocarcinoma (7%), and metaplastic breast (6%). At least one genomic alteration was identified in 87 patients (92%). The most common identifiable mutations were in TP53 (23%), KRAS (10%), PIK3CA (9%), CDKN2A/B (8%), BRAF (7%), MLL (7%), and ARID1A (6%). Thirty-six patients (38%) with 21 different tumors had at least one potentially actionable alteration. Thirteen patients received targeted therapy. Of these, 4 had a partial response, 6 had stable disease, and 3 had progressive disease as the best response. The addition of genomic profiling to management of rare cancers adds a potential line of therapy for cancers that have little or no standard of care. In our analysis, tumors with a BRAF alteration responded well to BRAF inhibitors. Mol Cancer Ther; 17(7); 1595-601. (C) 2018 AACR.
引用
收藏
页码:1595 / 1601
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Current practices and guidelines for clinical next-generation sequencing oncology testing
    Strom, Samuel P.
    [J]. CANCER BIOLOGY & MEDICINE, 2016, 13 (01) : 3 - 11
  • [22] Current practices and guidelines for clinical next-generation sequencing oncology testing
    Samuel P.Strom
    [J]. Cancer Biology & Medicine, 2016, (01) : 3 - 11
  • [23] Next-Generation Sequencing of Lymphoid Cancers: From Discovery to Clinical Translation
    Gascoyne, Randy D.
    [J]. BLOOD, 2012, 120 (21)
  • [24] Clinical use of next-generation sequencing panel in pediatric oncology patients
    Choi, Jung Yoon
    Park, Hyun Jin
    Kim, Bo Kyung
    Hong, Kyung Taek
    Koh, Jaemoon
    Park, Sung-Hye
    Bae, Jeong Mo
    Yun, Hongseok
    Kang, Hyoung Jin
    [J]. CANCER RESEARCH, 2023, 83 (07)
  • [25] The application of next-generation sequencing in the community clinical oncology setting.
    Reddy, Pavan S.
    Rahal, Ahmad Khalil
    Kallail, K. James
    Moore, Dennis Frederic
    Phu Van Truong
    Mattar, Bassam Ibrahim
    Cannon, Michael W.
    Nabbout, Nassim H.
    Page, Seth Joel
    Quoc Van Truong
    Dakhil, Christopher
    Deutsch, Jeremy Michael
    Dakhil, Shaker R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (15)
  • [26] Current practices and guidelines for clinical next-generation sequencing oncology testing
    Samuel P.Strom
    [J]. Cancer Biology & Medicine, 2016, 13 (01) : 3 - 11
  • [27] Integrating next-generation sequencing into clinical oncology: strategies, promises and pitfalls
    Horak, Peter
    Frohling, Stefan
    Glimm, Hanno
    [J]. ESMO OPEN, 2016, 1 (05)
  • [28] Next-generation sequencing: from conventional applications to breakthrough genomic analyses and precision oncology
    Ziogas, Demosthenes E.
    Kyrochristos, Ioannis D.
    Roukos, Dimitrios H.
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2018, 15 (01) : 1 - 3
  • [29] Next-generation sequencing for rare genetic disorders
    Tekin, Mustafa
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2011, 22 : S19 - S19
  • [30] Review of Clinical Next-Generation Sequencing
    Yohe, Sophia
    Thyagarajan, Bharat
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2017, 141 (11) : 1544 - 1557