Selection of Chemicals for the Development and Evaluation of In Vitro Methods for Skin Sensitisation Testing

被引:35
|
作者
Casati, Silvia [1 ]
Aeby, Pierre [2 ]
Kimber, Ian [3 ]
Maxwell, Gavin [4 ]
Ovigne, Jean Marc [5 ]
Roggen, Erwin [6 ]
Rovida, Costanza [1 ]
Tosti, Luca [1 ]
Basketter, David [7 ]
机构
[1] European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr, Inst Hlth & Consumer Protect, In Vitro Methods Unit ECVAM, I-21027 Ispra, VA, Italy
[2] Procter & Gamble Co Wella Cosmital, Marly, Switzerland
[3] Univ Manchester, Fac Life Sci, Manchester, Lancs, England
[4] Unilever, Sharnbrook, Beds, England
[5] LOreal Res, Aulnay Sous Bois, France
[6] Novozymes AS, Bagsvaerd, Denmark
[7] DABMEB Consultancy Ltd, Sharnbrook, Beds, England
来源
关键词
LYMPH-NODE ASSAY; ALLERGIC CONTACT-DERMATITIS; GUINEA-PIG; MAXIMIZATION TEST; HYPERSENSITIVITY; IDENTIFICATION; CLASSIFICATION; SENSITIVITY; VALIDATION; BUEHLER;
D O I
10.1177/026119290903700313
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
There is a general, indeed pressing, need to develop, validate and bring into common use alternative methods to obviate the use of animals in toxicity testing. Specifically in the field of skin sensitisation, considerable investments are being made, at both the industry and university levels, in the development of alternative approaches to incorporate novel biomarkers or to enhance the functioning of existing models. In the development and/or optimisation phases of a method, the testing of reference chemicals with well characterised responses in predictive in vivo tests, would allow for an early appreciation of the utility of a method. More specifically, challenging a method with the same set of chemicals would facifitate the assessment of its possible contribution to an integrated testing approach. With such a small number of substances, the limited feasibility of fully representing the chemical and biological diversity of known chemical (skin) allergens is acknowledged. However, an attempt was made to cover, as much as possible, the range of known potencies for skin allergens, and to reflect the variety of physicochemical and reaction mechanisms involved in the sensitisation process. Furthermore, chemicals known to require biotransformation or other types of activation were included in the list, in order to evaluate the potential of the test system to detect them correctly. It is acknowledged that other chemical sets also might be appropriate for test development purposes. However, it was deemed important both to make public this recommendation and to encourage the use of a core set. It is therefore proposed that these selected substances are used as reference compounds for the primary development of new tests, or for the improvement of existing tests. In our view, a test that is able to correctly identify these chemicals should be considered very promising and worthy of further evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 312
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Systematic evaluation of non-animal test methods for skin sensitisation safety assessment
    Reisinger, Kerstin
    Hoffmann, Sebastian
    Alepee, Nathalie
    Ashikaga, Takao
    Barroso, Joao
    Elcombe, Cliff
    Gellatly, Nicola
    Galbiati, Valentina
    Gibbs, Susan
    Groux, Herve
    Hibatallah, Jalila
    Keller, Donald
    Kern, Petra
    Klaric, Martina
    Kolle, Susanne
    Kuehnl, Jochen
    Lambrechts, Nathalie
    Lindstedt, Malin
    Millet, Marion
    Martinozzi-Teissier, Silvia
    Natsch, Andreas
    Petersohn, Dirk
    Pike, Ian
    Sakaguchi, Hitoshi
    Schepky, Andreas
    Tailhardat, Magalie
    Templier, Marie
    van Vliet, Erwin
    Maxwell, Gavin
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO, 2015, 29 (01) : 259 - 270
  • [22] A strategy for the prediction of skin sensitisation:: an alternative to animal testing
    Rousset, F
    Verda, D
    Arrighi, JF
    Péguet-Navarro, J
    Cottin, M
    [J]. PROGRESS IN THE REDUCTION, REFINEMENT AND REPLACEMENT OF ANIMAL EXPERIMENTATION, 2000, 31 : 635 - 642
  • [23] Development of an in vitro model for studying the penetration of chemicals through compromised skin
    Davies, Diane J.
    Heylings, Jon R.
    McCarthy, Timothy J.
    Correa, Catherine M.
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO, 2015, 29 (01) : 176 - 181
  • [24] Skin testing versus in vitro testing in the evaluation of aeroallergy: The great debate
    Oppenheimer, John
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY & ALLERGY, 2015, 29 (05) : 362 - 364
  • [25] In vitro permeation testing for the evaluation of drug delivery to the skin
    Lane, Majella E.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2024, 201
  • [26] Critical review of the human database used for performance evaluation of defined approaches to skin sensitisation testing
    Herzler, M.
    Gordon, J.
    Ko, H. -S.
    Matheson, J.
    Strickland, J.
    Thierse, H. -J.
    Truax, J.
    Kleinstreuer, N.
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2019, 314 : S247 - S248
  • [27] Development of a guideline on defined approaches for skin sensitisation
    Casati, S.
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2019, 314 : S47 - S47
  • [28] Further development of an in vitro skin absorption method to measure compartmental disposition and kinetics for chemicals in skin
    Pendlington, Ruth
    Minter, Helen
    Stupart, L.
    MacKay, Cameron
    Roper, Clive
    Sanders, David
    Pease, Camilla
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2007, 172 : S106 - S106
  • [29] The frontline of alternatives to animal testing: novel in vitro skin model application in drug development and evaluation
    Zhao, He
    Chen, Zhaozeng
    Kang, Xingchen
    Yang, Bo
    Luo, Peihua
    Li, Hui
    He, Qiaojun
    [J]. TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 196 (02) : 152 - 169
  • [30] Strategic selection of chemicals for testing. Part I. Functionalities and performance of basic selection methods
    Aladjov, H.
    Todorov, M.
    Schmieder, P.
    Serafimova, R.
    Mekenyan, O.
    Veith, G.
    [J]. SAR AND QSAR IN ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2009, 20 (1-2) : 159 - 183