Cultural eutrophication in the Choptank and Patuxent estuaries of Chesapeake Bay

被引:105
|
作者
Fisher, T. R. [1 ]
Hagy, J. D., III
Boynton, W. R.
Williams, M. R.
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Horn Point Lab, Ctr Environm Sci, Cambridge, MD 21613 USA
[2] US EPA, NHEERL, Gulf Ecol Div, Gulf Breeze, FL 32561 USA
[3] Univ Maryland, Chesapeake Biol Lab, Ctr Environm Sci, Solomons, MD 20688 USA
关键词
D O I
10.4319/lo.2006.51.1_part_2.0435
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The Choptank and Patuxent tributaries of Chesapeake Bay have become eutrophic over the last 50-100 years. Systematic monitoring of nutrient inputs began in similar to 1970, and there have been 2-5-fold increases in nitrogen (N) and phosphor-us (P) inputs during 1970-2004 due to sewage discharges, fertilizer applications, atmospheric deposition, and changes in land use. Hydrochemical modeling and land-use yield coefficients suggest that current input rates are 4-20 times higher for N and P than under forested conditions existing 350 yr ago. Sewage is a major cause of increased nutrients in the Patuxent; agricultural inputs dominate in the Choptank. These loading increases have caused three major water-quality problems: (1) increased nutrients, phytoplankton, and turbidity; (2) decreased submerged grasses due to higher turbidity and epiphyton shading; and (3) bottom-water hypoxia due to respiration of excess organic matter. Oxygen in the Patuxent is consistently < 3 mg L-1 in bottom waters in summer, whereas oxygen in Choptank bottom waters has been decreasing for the last 20 yr and is now approaching 3 mg L-1 in wet years. The low N:P of sewage inputs to the Patuxent results in an N-limited, P-saturated system, whereas the Choptank is primarily limited by N, but with P limitation of phytoplankton during spring river flows. Insufficient action has been taken to improve the water and habitat quality of these estuaries, although reduced eutrophication in dry years suggests that both estuaries will respond to significant decreases in nutrients.
引用
收藏
页码:435 / 447
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Can oyster restoration reverse cultural eutrophication in Chesapeake Bay?
    Cerco, Carl F.
    Noel, Mark R.
    ESTUARIES AND COASTS, 2007, 30 (02) : 331 - 343
  • [2] Can oyster restoration reverse cultural eutrophication in Chesapeake Bay?
    Carl F. Cerco
    Mark R. Noel
    Estuaries and Coasts, 2007, 30 : 331 - 343
  • [3] Agricultural pesticides in the Patuxent River, a tributary of the Chesapeake Bay
    Harman-Fetcho, JA
    McConnell, LL
    Baker, JE
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 1999, 28 (03) : 928 - 938
  • [4] A sediment chronology of the eutrophication of Chesapeake Bay
    Cornwell, JC
    Conley, DJ
    Owens, M
    Stevenson, JC
    ESTUARIES, 1996, 19 (2B): : 488 - 499
  • [5] SEASONAL DISTRIBUTION OF BDELLOVIBRIOS AT THE MOUTH OF THE PATUXENT RIVER IN THE CHESAPEAKE BAY
    WILLIAMS, HN
    FALKLER, WA
    SHAY, DE
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY, 1982, 28 (01) : 111 - 116
  • [6] Localized Water Quality Improvement in the Choptank Estuary, a Tributary of Chesapeake Bay
    Fisher, Thomas R.
    Fox, Rebecca J.
    Gustafson, Anne B.
    Koontz, Erika
    Lepori-Bui, Michelle
    Lewis, James
    ESTUARIES AND COASTS, 2021, 44 (05) : 1274 - 1293
  • [7] Ammobaculites, foraminiferal proprietor of Chesapeake Bay estuaries
    Ellison, Robert L.
    1600, Geological Society of America (133):
  • [8] Localized Water Quality Improvement in the Choptank Estuary, a Tributary of Chesapeake Bay
    Thomas R. Fisher
    Rebecca J. Fox
    Anne B. Gustafson
    Erika Koontz
    Michelle Lepori-Bui
    James Lewis
    Estuaries and Coasts, 2021, 44 : 1274 - 1293
  • [9] Human behavior and ecosystem valuation: An application to the Patuxent watershed of the Chesapeake Bay
    Geoghegan, J
    Bockstael, N
    ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION AND HUMAN ACTIVITIES: RECONCILING ECONOMICS AND ECOLOGY, 1997, : 147 - 173
  • [10] NUTRIENTS AND IRON IN THE CHOPTANK RIVER (MD) ESTUARY - IS THERE A NET CONTRIBUTION TO CHESAPEAKE BAY
    YARBRO, LA
    CARLSON, PR
    FISHER, TR
    ESTUARIES, 1983, 6 (03): : 290 - 290