Cultural eutrophication in the Choptank and Patuxent estuaries of Chesapeake Bay

被引:105
|
作者
Fisher, T. R. [1 ]
Hagy, J. D., III
Boynton, W. R.
Williams, M. R.
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Horn Point Lab, Ctr Environm Sci, Cambridge, MD 21613 USA
[2] US EPA, NHEERL, Gulf Ecol Div, Gulf Breeze, FL 32561 USA
[3] Univ Maryland, Chesapeake Biol Lab, Ctr Environm Sci, Solomons, MD 20688 USA
关键词
D O I
10.4319/lo.2006.51.1_part_2.0435
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The Choptank and Patuxent tributaries of Chesapeake Bay have become eutrophic over the last 50-100 years. Systematic monitoring of nutrient inputs began in similar to 1970, and there have been 2-5-fold increases in nitrogen (N) and phosphor-us (P) inputs during 1970-2004 due to sewage discharges, fertilizer applications, atmospheric deposition, and changes in land use. Hydrochemical modeling and land-use yield coefficients suggest that current input rates are 4-20 times higher for N and P than under forested conditions existing 350 yr ago. Sewage is a major cause of increased nutrients in the Patuxent; agricultural inputs dominate in the Choptank. These loading increases have caused three major water-quality problems: (1) increased nutrients, phytoplankton, and turbidity; (2) decreased submerged grasses due to higher turbidity and epiphyton shading; and (3) bottom-water hypoxia due to respiration of excess organic matter. Oxygen in the Patuxent is consistently < 3 mg L-1 in bottom waters in summer, whereas oxygen in Choptank bottom waters has been decreasing for the last 20 yr and is now approaching 3 mg L-1 in wet years. The low N:P of sewage inputs to the Patuxent results in an N-limited, P-saturated system, whereas the Choptank is primarily limited by N, but with P limitation of phytoplankton during spring river flows. Insufficient action has been taken to improve the water and habitat quality of these estuaries, although reduced eutrophication in dry years suggests that both estuaries will respond to significant decreases in nutrients.
引用
收藏
页码:435 / 447
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Phosphorus Burial in Sediments Along the Salinity Gradient of the Patuxent River, a Subestuary of the Chesapeake Bay (USA)
    Jeanne L. Hartzell
    Thomas E. Jordan
    Jeffrey C. Cornwell
    Estuaries and Coasts, 2010, 33 : 92 - 106
  • [22] Phosphorus Burial in Sediments Along the Salinity Gradient of the Patuxent River, a Subestuary of the Chesapeake Bay (USA)
    Hartzell, Jeanne L.
    Jordan, Thomas E.
    Cornwell, Jeffrey C.
    ESTUARIES AND COASTS, 2010, 33 (01) : 92 - 106
  • [23] Chesapeake Bay eutrophication: Scientific understanding, ecosystem restoration, and challenges for agriculture
    Boesch, DF
    Brinsfield, RB
    Magnien, RE
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2001, 30 (02) : 303 - 320
  • [24] A review of phytoplankton composition within Chesapeake Bay and its tidal estuaries
    Marshall, HG
    Burchardt, L
    Lacouture, R
    JOURNAL OF PLANKTON RESEARCH, 2005, 27 (11) : 1083 - 1102
  • [25] Factors Controlling Hypoxia Occurrence in Estuaries, Chester River, Chesapeake Bay
    Tian, Richard
    WATER, 2020, 12 (07)
  • [26] A 2,500-YEAR HISTORY OF ANOXIA AND EUTROPHICATION IN CHESAPEAKE BAY
    COOPER, SR
    BRUSH, GS
    ESTUARIES, 1993, 16 (3B): : 617 - 626
  • [27] Relationships between watershed stressors and sediment contamination in Chesapeake Bay estuaries
    Comeleo, RL
    Paul, JF
    August, PV
    Copeland, J
    Baker, C
    Hale, SS
    Latimer, RW
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 1996, 11 (05) : 307 - 319
  • [28] An Improved Eutrophication Assessment Algorithm of Estuaries and Coastal Waters in Liaodong Bay
    Li, Mengjun
    Sun, Yonghua
    Li, Xiaojuan
    Cui, Mengying
    Huang, Chen
    REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (19)
  • [29] FUNGI OF CHESAPEAKE BAY AND ITS TRIBUTARIES .4. 3 NEW SPECIES FROM PATUXENT RIVER
    SHEARER, CA
    MYCOLOGIA, 1974, 66 (01) : 16 - 24
  • [30] Bioenergetic trajectories underlying partial migration in Patuxent River (Chesapeake Bay) white perch (Morone americana)
    Kerr, Lisa A.
    Secor, David H.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES AND AQUATIC SCIENCES, 2009, 66 (04) : 602 - 612