Transport Disc Distraction Osteogenesis for the Reconstruction of a Calvarial Defect

被引:5
|
作者
Hong, Jong Won [1 ]
Song, Seung Yong [1 ]
Woo, Dae Gon [2 ]
Kim, Han Sung [2 ]
Hong, Hyun Joon [1 ]
Choi, Joong Ho [3 ]
Park, Beyoung Yun [1 ]
Kim, Yong Oock [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Inst Human Tissue Restorat, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Seoul 120752, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Wonju, South Korea
[3] Seoul Plast Surg Clin, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Transport disc; distraction osteogenesis; calvarial bone; BONE DEFECTS; REGENERATION; GRAFTS;
D O I
10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181a2e05b
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Reconstruction of bone defects is possible through distraction osteogenesis using small bone transport discs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usability of transport disc distraction osteogenesis (TDDO) in the reconstruction of skull defects in an animal experiment. Methods: Eleven mongrel female dogs were used. Craniectomy (33 x 15 mm) was performed on both sides of the parietal bone symmetrically. On the experimental site, the 7 x 15-mm transport bone disc was used for TDDO. The control site was left in the defect state. An external distraction device was used. The latency period was 5 days, the rate of distraction was 1 mm/d, and distraction was done for 26 days. After a 6-month consolidation period, a computed tomographic scan was performed. The area of regenerated bone was measured from the computed tomographic scan. The hardness was checked on the regenerated bone and the normal bone. A histologic examination of the regenerated bone was done. Result: Eight cases were included in the evaluation, and 3 cases were excluded because they showed early escape of the distraction device. The mean (SD) area of the regenerated bone was 57.1% (26.3) in the experimental site and 41.8% (21.3) in the control site, which was not a statistically significant difference (P > 0.05). The mean (SD) hardness was 0.50 (0.17) MPa in the experiment site and 0.55 (0.29) MPa in the normal calvarial bone; the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). On histologic examination, membranous ossification was found in the regenerated bone in the experimental site. Conclusions: Transport disc distraction osteogenesis can induce new bone formation with hardness comparable to that of a normal bone. However, the amount of regenerated bone is not sufficient to allow TDDO to be substituted for conventional autogenous bone grafts.
引用
收藏
页码:790 / 796
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Mandible reconstruction using a 2-phase transport disc distraction osteogenesis: A case report
    Whitesides, LM
    Wunderle, RC
    Guerrero, C
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2005, 63 (02) : 261 - 266
  • [22] Transport Distraction Osteogenesis for Closing Full-Thickness Calvarial Defects in Sheep
    Icekson, M.
    Regev, E.
    Neuman, R.
    Margulis, A.
    CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2009, 46 (04): : 363 - 367
  • [23] Reconstruction of the mandibular condyle using transport distraction osteogenesis
    StuckiMcCormick, SU
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 1997, 8 (01) : 48 - 52
  • [24] Intraoral distraction osteogenesis for bone transport in mandibular reconstruction
    Guerrero, C
    González, M
    Figueroa, F
    4TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF MAXILLOFACIAL AND CRANIOFACIAL DISTRACTION, 2003, : 311 - 316
  • [25] Reconstruction of a large mandibular defect by distraction osteogenesis:: A case report
    Basa, S
    Üner, E
    Çitir, M
    Aras, K
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2000, 58 (12) : 1425 - 1428
  • [26] Supraperiosteal Transport Distraction Osteogenesis for Reconstructing a Segmental Defect of the Mandible
    Hibi, Hideharu
    Ueda, Minoru
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2011, 69 (03) : 742 - 746
  • [27] Reconstruction of large mandibular bone and soft-tissue defect using bone transport distraction osteogenesis
    Elsalanty, Mohammed E.
    Taher, Taher N.
    Zakhary, Ibrahim E.
    Al-Shahaat, Osama A.
    Refai, Mohammed
    El-Mekkawi, Hatem A.
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2007, 18 (06) : 1397 - 1402
  • [28] Preliminary results from a prospective efficacy trial of transport disc distraction osteogenesis for the reconstruction of segmental mandibular defects
    Chepeha, DB
    Rudzik, AR
    Teknos, TN
    Prince, ME
    Kim, J
    Moyer, JS
    Fung, K
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 1 (01) : 107 - 108
  • [29] Transport Distraction Osteogenesis for Maxillomandibular Reconstruction: Current Concepts and Applications
    Neelakandan R.S.
    Bhargava D.
    Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, 2012, 11 (3) : 291 - 299
  • [30] “Transport Distraction Osteogenesis for Reconstruction of Mandibular Defects”: Our Experience
    Nanjappa M.
    Natashekara M.
    Sendil Kumar C.
    Kumaraswamy S.V.
    Keerthi R.
    Ashwin D.P.
    Gopinath A.L.
    Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, 2011, 10 (2) : 93 - 100